Jesus Christ, you have officially crossed into tin hat territory.
How so, how many generals has he gone through already? He has already been proposing using the military on protests:
The president said the extra forces are needed to deal with increasingly violent actors in major cities.
www.militarytimes.com
Trump NOT ordering the military to do anything about his pumped up pro Trump militias, containing US Military and police isn't in the realm of Tin hat here.
Don't try to twist the argument. Your first response to me pointing out how much the US military would trounce them was to talk about Zetas in your neighborhood and how civilians can own military equipment. You stated that some of them are in the military in your first post, but never once used the argument that that means they could control parts of it (something I also made provisions for in my first post, but you didn't bother to address). When I followed up by pointing out how none of that matters, you went with "they can get all the stuff and skills necessary" and after that went with "but they are backed by politicians!" and now with "they are the US military and Trump".
You've been sliding your arguments since the second reply to me and it is plain to see if you look at our posting history in this thread.
Please show me where I specifically EVER stated they woulkd be vs Us Military. GO ahead. Me not addressing it doesn't mean I once ever thought that. Let's Review shall we:
Reply1) you tell me not to worry about comparing them to the Zetas, US Militias can't obtain anything to worry about and they wouldn't know how to use it. I counter stating the cartels get whatever they want and US militias with this type of makeup can obtain whatever they want and can . Nope, no Them VS US Military anywhere to be seen there either.
reply2) Then I respond to SupahEwok stating they can get whatever they want.
reply3) You then go on again about them not being able to obtain stuff thinking I do not fully understand, when I do 100% completely understand they can obtain whatever they want. and they are active US military as well. Not even a hint of them VS US Military anywhere to be seen there either. Nope. go re read it for yourself. Me saying they can get what they want, recruit who they need to do whatever they need to accomplish AND stating they are active US military as well is in no way saying they would be fighting US military or implying such. That being in your head at all is all on you, as that never even entered my mind. Why would it?
reply4)Replied to supahewok again stating they can get whatever they want, and recruit whoever they want. Never once did I say them vs US military.
reply5)I keep telling you they can get what they want, you still insisting they cannot. You seem to not understand that the zetas were working WITH military, and that is what I am trying to tell you the militias is as well but I guess that hasn't sunk in yet.
reply6) I try to clarify this so you get the idea out of your head once and for all that the militia would not be fighting US military at all, they would be working with active members of the military and US GOP officials to get what they want. The Militas fight as never been with the military, they made it clear in the OP their plan is to fight urban liberals" not the US military.
reply7) You tell me the oath isn't to the president when it is, then I STILL try to clarify that they wouldn't be fighting the US military. It is like how many times do I have to repeat that for it to sink in for you to actually get it? The president is the commander and chief of the military, they will follow his orders. He can use them to clear protesters and he can tell them to stand down and not attack militias as well. Trump , as the president can claim the election was fraudulent and he will remain the commander in chief of the US military UNTIL the courts sort it out. You are proposing that we have a military coup to undermine that. Until the courts rule one way or another Trump is still legally president. Their orders WOULD NOT BE UNLAWFUL. The president is within his rights to command the military until the supreme court deems otherwise. I am not even sure why you would think it unlawful, that is not how US law even works.
reply8) Then you tell me I twisted something when you were the only one who had it twisted in your head here. I was not in any way saying the US military would fight the militias, and and I am not sure how you twisted it to think that. They wouldn't even need to fight the US military to even take the local armories. They have like one or two people there at most and they could just have their militia infiltrate it and let them in regardless. The local cops are who handle it when people try to break into those. That is why that plumber managed to steal a tank that time remember? He didn't even have to fight anyone for that either. Maybe you thought these things were more secure than they are or something..
en.wikipedia.org
Reply9)I tell Gordon it would not be an unlawful order for Trump to retain command of the military until Trumps appointed courts sort out " the fraudulent election" claim by Trump, keeping in mind that Trump is STILL IN COMMAND OF THE MILITARY ON ELECTION DAY REGARDLESS OF THE RESULTS. He doesn't actually leave office until January. Trump can order his military to do whatever he wants until then, of course within the bounds, but he still has a lot of bounds and Trump doesn't need permission from anyone to command his military.. He can have them guard cities, quell protests, or stand back and await instruction to allow militia groups such as this to do what they want as well. It is not an unlawful order, and this isn't even the first time in our Military history that the troops could be used against the people. I really was thinking about him just ordering the military to stand down, but our history has proven they can be used much worse at will really, afterall, we had Bloody Sunday.
Military already knows they could be used against protesters if Trump wants..
en.wikipedia.org
The president said the extra forces are needed to deal with increasingly violent actors in major cities.
www.militarytimes.com
Sen. Tom Udall is pushing legislation to update the Posse Comitatus Act to include more activated Guard members.
www.militarytimes.com
President Donald Trump wants military assistance along the U.S.-Mexico border. It wouldn’t be the first time a U.S. president has deployed the military domestically.
www.pbs.org
Reply10 THIS. And I have no idea why ANYONE thinks I said that the militia would be fighting the US MIlitary in the first place. LOL