tfw all you want to do is keep the mudbloods outLike Harry Potter?
tfw all you want to do is keep the mudbloods outLike Harry Potter?
Yeah that's great for you man. Top kek and all that. Mad bants you're winning the Internet. Bolivia isn't a communist country and Morales isn't a communist though. And not in the way your meme implies as in he doesn't believe things that are fundamental to being a communist.Yeah I get information about communism from this book:
View attachment 1275
No, that's anti-trans propoganda. And also pushing the lgbt Liberal agenda.Like Harry Potter?
Ngl, you really left yourself wide open for whatever he throws next.Yeah that's great for you man. Top kek and all that. Mad bants you're winning the Internet. Bolivia isn't a communist country and Morales isn't a communist though. And not in the way your meme implies as in he doesn't believe things that are fundamental to being a communist.
Show me a country that lives up to these standards.They definitely had absolutely no connection to him or his party, yeah? Absolutely no way that it would taint their rulings in the future. They just dropped out of space into their seats in the court.
eh sometimes it's too easy. I don't want to turn this into a sport.Ngl, you really left yourself wide open for whatever he throws next.
Why though. Why is it even relevant. Why would I need to dig this up, I could just remind myself of any US bashing thread and divert your attention to the many infographics there praising the ground some European countries walk on.Show me a country that lives up to these standards.
I'm working the reception desk and I finished my book this is just me killing time until I go home and do something worthwhile like have a sandwich or autoerotic asphyxiation.Ngl, you really left yourself wide open for whatever he throws next.
FairI'm working the reception desk and I finished my book this is just me killing time until I go home and do something worthwhile like have a sandwich or autoerotic asphyxiation.
Then why do you hold courts not being demonstrably 100% unbiased as something against one particular country?eh sometimes it's too easy. I don't want to turn this into a sport.
Why though. Why is it even relevant. Why would I need to dig this up, I could just remind myself of any US bashing thread and divert your attention to the many infographics there praising the ground some European countries walk on.
Bants.Then why do you hold courts not being demonstrably 100% unbiased as something against one particular country?
because their ruling was a fucking jokeThen why do you hold courts not being demonstrably 100% unbiased as something against one particular country?
also thisBants.
Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957)Well, no.
Imagine the USA lost a war, and its surrender demanded it sign a treaty where its people were forcibly disarmed and refused the right to own guns. The penalty for noncompliance would be for its enemy to smash it back to the stone age.
Would we really propose that the US government would say it could not sign such a treaty because it was unconstitutional? Or that it signed the treaty, and the Supreme Court promptly struck it down as unconstitutional? I would say surely not. The circumstances would clearly demand that the treaty supercede the second amendment, and I'll bet you the Constitution, somewhere, makes allowances for that to be done.
Article 6 specifically.Would we really propose that the US government would say it could not sign such a treaty because it was unconstitutional? Or that it signed the treaty, and the Supreme Court promptly struck it down as unconstitutional? I would say surely not. The circumstances would clearly demand that the treaty supercede the second amendment, and I'll bet you the Constitution, somewhere, makes allowances for that to be done.
This is not an argument.Forgive me for not even clicking "jacobinmag". I'm well aware you subscibe to communist cesspools that will tell you exactly what you want to believe.