Can this please be one of the lessons learned? You will not culture war Republicans out of being Republicans.
Nevada can flip, covid lockdowns destroyed Las Vegas.is anyone else scared about Nevada. It's small but we need every electoral college but we get.
You see America third parties do matterholy shit if Biden gets WI then it's thanks to JoJo taking 1.5% of the vote
Is that perhaps due to a lot of 2016 republicans quitting the party, so out of those remaining more would be inclined to vote for trump but it's actually out of a smaller group of voters?Can this please be one of the lessons learned? You will not culture war Republicans out of being Republicans.
Very possibly. The number of registered Republicans is now much lower than the number of registered Democrats, in large part because a lot of conservatives (who still tend to vote Republican) have switched their official registration to independent.Is that perhaps due to a lot of 2016 republicans quitting the party, so out of those remaining more would be inclined to vote for trump but it's actually out of a smaller group of voters?
And despite that it is still such a close race. This was supposed to be an upset, with one of the largest numbers of participating voters it seems to have entirely dismissed then notion that the only thing getting Trump elected was some sort of cult of personality. Regarding 2016 the theory was that low turnout on the democrat side, combined with the more fanatical members of the republican voter-base got Trump elected.Very possibly. The number of registered Republicans is now much lower than the number of registered Democrats, in large part because a lot of conservatives (who still tend to vote Republican) have switched their official registration to independent.
I think what is getting him elected is actually whatever the reverse of a cult of personality is, basically a cult of disliking the mainstream democrats enough where you'd even vote for Trump.And despite that it is still such a close race. This was supposed to be an upset, with one of the largest numbers of participating voters it seems to have entirely dismissed then notion that the only thing getting Trump elected was some sort of cult of personality. Regarding 2016 the theory was that low turnout on the democrat side, combined with the more fanatical members of the republican voter-base got Trump elected.
But now we see that he can muster a number of supporters large enough to make it a close race even with the increased participation.
On both sides. An effect of the polarization of current American politics since 2012 is that people vote against the other side and not for their candidates. I blame wall-street.I think what is getting him elected is actually whatever the reverse of a cult of personality is, basically a cult of disliking the mainstream democrats enough where you'd even vote for Trump.
I feel it too but I control my lizard brain and vote for policies and not feelings and I'm a life-long leftie with a socialist upbringing so someone more ideologically centrist would be many times more tempted than even that.
No man, I'm on the left side and I dislike the establishment democrats on a personality and character level way more than the republicans out of whom I have no expectations to begin with. It's the whole "you were supposed to unite the force Anakin, not tear it apart!" thing over and over again.On both sides. An effect of the polarization of current American politics since 2012 is that people vote against the other side and not for their candidates. I blame wall-street.
I honestly think that democrats tend to be more introspective when it comes to both policy and candidates. But of course the proof isn't overwhelming. Democrats do tend to attract more academics, whom I suspect contemplates policy more but that might be bias. And Republicans still elected to vote for Trump following the access hollywood tape instead of either voting third party, abstaining, or going for Hillary, which seems to indicate a completely uncritical approach to the candidate.On both sides. An effect of the polarization of current American politics since 2012 is that people vote against the other side and not for their candidates. I blame wall-street.
I begged people in another forum to post positive things about their candidate. I posted things like Trump's Platinum plan to aid struggling black communities. How his Covid response, though I think an over reach and should have been more like Sweden's, was terrific. The hospital ships. The respirators. Etc. No one took the bait on posting positive things about Biden. I do not recall a single pro-Biden thing posted. It was all vicious, almost violent insults about Trump and worse, his supporters. Being POTUS and our national leader, putting our own nation's needs ahead of the whims of a globalist elite cabal that has taken over our legacy MSM was inherently monstrous. And so is anyone who would Make America Great Again.I honestly think that democrats tend to be more introspective when it comes to both policy and candidates. But of course the proof isn't overwhelming. Democrats do tend to attract more academics, whom I suspect contemplates policy more but that might be bias. And Republicans still elected to vote for Trump following the access hollywood tape instead of either voting third party, abstaining, or going for Hillary, which seems to indicate a completely uncritical approach to the candidate.
Nah it's not that it's uncritical, it's that people genuinely didn't mind them. You assume everyone was offended but just, what, didn't analyze it and base a conclusion out of that feeling and just ignored it and voted for him despite feeling deeply offended?I honestly think that democrats tend to be more introspective when it comes to both policy and candidates. But of course the proof isn't overwhelming. Democrats do tend to attract more academics, whom I suspect contemplates policy more but that might be bias. And Republicans still elected to vote for Trump following the access hollywood tape instead of either voting third party, abstaining, or going for Hillary, which seems to indicate a completely uncritical approach to the candidate.
Well, the thing about "everyone" hating someone is that not everyone gets to vote, and a lot of people who can vote aren't voting for the specific individual but the party.My daughter had dinner with us last night and said she could not imagine Mitch McConnell winning as "everyone" hates him.
He won. Early on, his opponent was actually winning. Nope.
The thing is he's in one of those places where they would rather vote for Hitler then the opposing party. No matter how hateful he is his position is secure.Well, the thing about "everyone" hating someone is that not everyone gets to vote, and a lot of people who can vote aren't voting for the specific individual but the party.
But she's right in the sense that McConnell is intensely hateable.
Well, in case you haven't figured it out, bad things happen in Philadelphia. Those "totally not polling places" I was complaining about the other day are most of what's left to count. In pretending they were mail-in ballots to skirt election law in the state, they decided to leave them all sealed until election day, so they've got hundreds of thousands of specifically Philadelphia votes to count that were gathered in a questionably legal way. I will be relieved if Biden flips Michigan and it doesn't matter anyway, cause I don't like the idea of the entire election coming down to that pissing contest, cause if the missing votes follow existing geographic trends we're looking at a dead heat.I am, and it looks rather like Trump unless the remaining districts swing HUGELY Democratic.
His opponent ran on having been a fighter pilot and not much else. American politics is intensely insulting to everyone's intelligence.Well, the thing about "everyone" hating someone is that not everyone gets to vote, and a lot of people who can vote aren't voting for the specific individual but the party.
But she's right in the sense that McConnell is intensely hateable.
Maybe, but I prefer to not be so negative. At base, I think we should assume that they are "genuine" votes, however odd the procedure of their collection may seem. Innocent until proven guilty, and all.Well, in case you haven't figured it out, bad things happen in Philadelphia.
I agree. I think the USA would heavily benefit from a clear result, and not a load of controversy and courtroom shitshow to pile more fuel on the mutual antagonism.I will be relieved if Biden flips Michigan and it doesn't matter anyway, cause I don't like the idea of the entire election coming down to that pissing contest, cause if the missing votes follow existing geographic trends we're looking at a dead heat.
I do think they are perfectly acceptable votes that should absolutely be counted regardless of the result, but I'm still going to resent a place with a recent history of election fraud deciding to write their own rules basically just to piss off the Trump campaign. They could have just as well said "sure, you can observe the election process early because we're taking extraordinary measures around the pandemic. We'll start counting and be totally transparent about the process" and everything would be excellent.Maybe, but I prefer to not be so negative. At base, I think we should assume that they are "genuine" votes, however odd the procedure of their collection may seem. Innocent until proven guilty, and all.