I'm going to wait for you all to have yours and if it doesn't kill you, then I'll have mine. However, if I end up being the only one posting here, I'll know what's happened and just not bother.
You fool, we're going to act as though we got it, tell you it worked great, and then you will get it first!I'm going to wait for you all to have yours and if it doesn't kill you, then I'll have mine. However, if I end up being the only one posting here, I'll know what's happened and just not bother.
I'm going to wait for you all to have yours and if it doesn't kill you, then I'll have mine. However, if I end up being the only one posting here, I'll know what's happened and just not bother.
What, you guys haven't got it yet? Wow. I pity you.You fool, we're going to act as though we got it, tell you it worked great, and then you will get it first!
No, I'd like them to do reporting. If it's not worth doing actual reporting, it's not worth repeating. You're ok with professional headline writers, I am not.Just not report... that the President of the United States is spreading a conspiracy theory?
Same. You never buy a new product, until the reviews and revisions.Seriously, I don't like getting consoles before a revision or two. I don't know how I feel about this vaccine straight out the gate.
OK, so what would you like them to do with this story, then?No, I'd like them to do reporting. If it's not worth doing actual reporting, it's not worth repeating. You're ok with professional headline writers, I am not.
Seriously, I don't like getting consoles before a revision or two. I don't know how I feel about this vaccine straight out the gate.
If I have to take a guess, by the time either of you even can have access to it, it will already had been tried out on hundreds of thousands of people for weeks or months: doctors, nurses, seniors and people with chronic illness. I doubt either of you can pre-order or get day-one access to it even if you wanted to.Same. You never buy a new product, until the reviews and revisions.
And like, it *is* news that he's saying and spreading this ideaOK, so what would you like them to do with this story, then?
There's zero basis for this tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory. But, the press aren't allowed to say so apparently, so... what, then? Must they pay undeserved credence to every wackjob 5G-tower theory?
You're really developing a talent for just blasting past what someone is saying and doubling down on your initial perspective.OK, so what would you like them to do with this story, then?
There's zero basis for this tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory. But, the press aren't allowed to say so apparently, so... what, then? Must they pay undeserved credence to every wackjob 5G-tower theory?
..?You're really developing a talent for just blasting past what someone is saying and doubling down on your initial perspective.
I can't tell them what to do, they have options. They can ignore it if they don't find it important. They can research the facts and present them if it is important. What isn't acceptable is posting an article with little more substance than the tweet they're reporting on.
They shouldn't, because it's newsworthy and in the public interest.You're really developing a talent for just blasting past what someone is saying and doubling down on your initial perspective.
I can't tell them what to do, they have options. They can ignore it if they don't find it important.
The "facts" were presented: it's baseless. You simply don't like the conclusion they drew, because it makes a politician you like look foolish. That's the long and the short of it.They can research the facts and present them if it is important.
...Why isn't that acceptable? Just giving a rundown on a simple event has been part of reporting since the inception of the profession. Some stories don't have more for the reporter to add. And there's nothing to "investigate", because it's just rank bollocks.What isn't acceptable is posting an article with little more substance than the tweet they're reporting on.
The chip will be replaced with NANO-MACHINES that will course through your bloodstream. It comes with the vaccine, but nobody is supposed to know!Does it come with a chip? Because I was promised a chip and I'm not taking a vaccine without one. If I can't get a chipped vaccine in this day and age then what have I been working towards? What has all this been about?
Agreed. Glad some right things are starting to come together.Let the first responders take it first, people with health problems, then teachers and the old, then middle-aged people, then us young people, then kids.
Also, I hate wearing a mask, I do it, but it feels weird.
I wish they gave me a potato chip after a flu shot.Does it come with a chip? Because I was promised a chip and I'm not taking a vaccine without one. If I can't get a chipped vaccine in this day and age then what have I been working towards? What has all this been about?
Only if a Republican says it.There's zero basis for this tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory. But, the press aren't allowed to say so apparently, so... what, then? Must they pay undeserved credence to every wackjob 5G-tower theory?
This is smart. If you ever get lost, someone can bring you to a veterinarian and get your chip scanned so that you can be returned home!Does it come with a chip? Because I was promised a chip and I'm not taking a vaccine without one. If I can't get a chipped vaccine in this day and age then what have I been working towards? What has all this been about?
a) I gave you multiple bases. Your repeated insistence that they don't exist is your own problem.The "facts" were presented: it's baseless. You simply don't like the conclusion they drew, because it makes a politician you like look foolish. That's the long and the short of it.
You gave me multiple speculations and insinuations. You gave me absolutely nothing solid, no actual evidence. And yes, for an enormous conspiracy, you need a shred of evidence.a) I gave you multiple bases. Your repeated insistence that they don't exist is your own problem.
Oh my gosh. Almost every candidate in US political history has said something along the lines of, "we're on track to win!", "we're going to win!", etc. There's nothing notable about that. Similarly, before the election was called, Donald Trump also said he was on track to win, and... the media didn't preface it's reports with the disclaimer that it's "without evidence"!b) Did they ask for evidence? Almost literally any statement made by anyone ever could be described as "claimed without evidence". Where were these people a week ago when Joe Biden claimed without evidence that he was going to win Pennsylvania. Even people on here didn't believe it yet, and he didn't offer up any explanation, he just said he was going to win Pennsylvania. Sounds like an important claim to make without evidence. Better headline that he claimed it without evidence, amirite? Nah, they just took that one at face value, and if they didn't, they would have asked why he believed that. Did they ask Trump before writing this article why he believed that? No. They didn't try to see evidence. The case they intend to make is stronger if they don't do actual journalism.