Election results discussion thread (and sadly the inevitable aftermath)

Status
Not open for further replies.

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,489
3,686
118
Oh well, have another if you need more than 1. I mean, you've provided 0, so I've provided literally infinitely more evidence, but still.


And yes, stopping the counting of votes early without all the votes counted in order to assume power is in fact a coup, so he was attempting a coup.

That wasn't the world around me lol, that was the point you just missed.
What point? You haven't made a credible point yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seanchaidh

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118

Couple of other thoughts: it still baffles me that fraud is still only thought about as Democrats stuffing the ballot box for Biden, like there aren't people who would cheat for Trump. Also, it's amazing that Biden Derangement Syndrome has already set in and the guy hasn't even set foot in the office (as president) yet.
Pretty sure at least one of the sources I used did point to it being a Republican accused of election Fraud and I pointed it out too..........
 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
Oh well, have another if you need more than 1. I mean, you've provided 0, so I've provided literally infinitely more evidence, but still.


And yes, stopping the counting of votes early without all the votes counted in order to assume power is in fact a coup, so he was attempting a coup.
BUT IT doesn't use the exact word lol


What point? You haven't made a credible point yet.
Just the double standards on show based entirely upon political positioning lol

One side it's Dog Whistles and clear evidence.
The other it's wrong and or doesn't count / doesn't apply because the exact words aren't used.

And that as you've helped shown flips entirely depending on which is most beneficial to pick for politics.
 

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,489
3,686
118
BUT IT doesn't use the exact word lol
lol you're bad at this.

Just the double standards on show based entirely upon political positioning lol

One side it's Dog Whistles and clear evidence.
The other it's wrong and or doesn't count / doesn't apply because the exact words aren't used.

And that as you've helped shown flips entirely depending on which is most beneficial to pick for politics.
Well no you're wrong because you haven't posted a single person calling for what you're saying, or hinting at what you're saying. You posted people talking about something else entirely, and spun it off into paranoid delusions, but as we saw, anybody who read what you posted disagreed with you. Because it's blatantly obvious you didn't really read what you were posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Revnak

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
lol you're bad at this.
No you're bad at getting the point lol

Well no you're wrong because you haven't posted a single person calling for what you're saying, or hinting at what you're saying. You posted people talking about something else entirely, and spun it off into paranoid delusions, but as we saw, anybody who read what you posted disagreed with you. Because it's blatantly obvious you didn't really read what you were posting.
Oh they were hinting at what I was saying lol

Some people picked up the hints


Deplatform all conservatives


How about marking Supporters?

 

Dwarvenhobble

Is on the Gin
May 26, 2020
6,014
665
118
This is the same group of people who responded to Obama winning the election by starting the Birther conspiracy and losing their shit because a black man won to the point that they embraced the Tea Party. There's a large minority of the Republican party and their voter base that has a skin as thick as graphene and who have proven time and time again that they can not handle setbacks without throwing a tantrum that would make a seven year old blush.
So how did the 2016 inauguration go again?
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,133
3,873
118

Iron

BOI
Sep 6, 2013
1,741
259
88
Country
Occupied Palestine
Judging people by their actions is just a teensy bit different to judging people for their bloodlines.
It's all the same kind of list, made for the same purpose.
The jews on the list were there because of their actions, as well.


*CRACKS KNUCKLES*

Excuse me, are you goysplaining antisemitism to me? Are you telling me what is or isn't antisemitism ?
 
Last edited:

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
12,093
6,376
118
Country
United Kingdom
Well the 2nd recount will use the machines. Thing being if we take the hand count as the accurate one if the machines show a disparity again it could be evidence of an issue.
Firstly, the (minor) disparity was down to a lost box, not due to the machines. The hand recount showed the machines had counted accurately.

Secondly, "if we take the hand count as being the accurate one", then we already have our definitive result and Trump has lost.

See the tweet I linked before
That tweet doesn't show her saying that. It shows her talking specifically about the people who want to overturn the result. We've already been over this.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,169
969
118
Country
USA
Would you care to elaborate on this?
Well, they did tell the FBI to investigate Michael Flynn literally for talking to a foreign diplomat during the transition period. Now people are arguing that stalling the transition is a national security risk.
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,215
6,485
118
Why are you pretending lists of conservative targets aren't proscription lists?
Because if it's random nobodies on Twitter spouting shit, as part of the vast tidal wave of pointless off-the-top-of-the-head shit that platform generates, it's just a distraction from things that are real and matter.
 

Iron

BOI
Sep 6, 2013
1,741
259
88
Country
Occupied Palestine
Because if it's random nobodies on Twitter spouting shit, as part of the vast tidal wave of pointless off-the-top-of-the-head shit that platform generates, it's just a distraction from things that are real and matter.
I also wait for the moment AOC returns to be a random nobody on twitter.

edit: Hey Agema, why is natural gas considered to be non-renewable? If methane isn't strictly biogenic, doesn't it mean that natural gas can be abiogenic and therefore could continue to be produced on earth and be found in the solar system? There's signs of abiogenic methane in space (other planets and meteorites)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.