THE MADMAN ACTUALLY DID IT!
@Silvanus
Cliff notes:
Unreturned absentee analysis:
- They found hundreds of thousands of unreturned absentee ballots (they requested them, but they're not marked as having voted)
- Of the people they were able to call and reach, they found that significant percentages of people never requested a ballot
- also a significant percentage say they returned a ballot, but they're still marked as unreturned, so their vote wasn't counted.
Low Activity: people who never voted, or didn't vote for a long time. Also very recent registrations.
- found a significant number of these people who denied casting these votes
NCOA (no longer live at address where they're registered)
- significant percentages in Nevada and Georgia.
- Then there's a Fox News segment about Nahshon Garrett who never requested an AZ ballot, but there's proof on the AZ website that a ballot was cast in his name and a claim that his signature was verified. He had actually voted in Tennessee.
Dead Voters
-It's very hard to try and tell who is dead with the data they had so nothing came of this.
Residency Analysis (Voters who requested change of address)
- numbers in hundreds and thousands of people who illegally voted twice (or had ballots illegally cast in their names)
- numbers for these need a DOB which was hard to come by in their data, so they expect the real numbers to be "significantly significantly higher"
Wisconsin
- there's a way you can vote early absentee, without an ID, by claiming "indefinitely confined"
- covid is not an excuse to claim "indefinitely confined"
- in prior years, the numbers are in the tens of thousands
- In 2020 the number spiked to over a million
Fake Addresses
- It's illegal to put a UPS or FedEx store as your address
- People tried to conceal it by putting "apt" and stuff
- Found numbers in the thousands, almost all voted by mail
- Just found in PA and GA so far.
NYT stories
- NYT claims "voting by mail is safe and secure!" - 2020
- NYT claims "voting by mail fraud is vastly more prevalent, flaws raise questions, it's problematic!" - 2016
His conclusion:
He cannot tell who legitimately won the election. There are too many doubts. Even if he had all the resources and time, he doesn't think he could tell.
All of this information has been given to lawyers