Yeah, that'd be great. Wouldn't it all be worth it? The election is the single most important thing in the country, isn't it? So why not pull out all the stops to ensure that it is safe and secure?
Election results discussion thread (and sadly the inevitable aftermath)
- Thread starter Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)
- Start date
- Status
Because it was safe and secure and if there was evidence to the contrary you wouldn't be scraping off the loony bin in Twitter?
"lalalala no evidence lalalala"
More news:
Sidney Powell: I Have a Huge Bag of Shredded Ballots in My Office -- Raffensperger and Gabriel Sterling Should Be Investigated (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Sidney Powell joined Grant Stinchfield on Friday night on Newsmax TV.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Michigan Secretary of State Issues Order to Delete Election Data Amid Audit Calls
It what can only be seen as an effort to keep the facts from coming to light in the face of problematic issues with Michigan’s 2020 General Election process, a memo has been issued from Michigan’s Secretary of State to destroy data. The Michigan State Republican Party Friday sounded an alarm...
nationalfile.com
It's a bit like the five stages of grief in struggling to come to terms with adversity: denial, anger, bargaining, depression. Eventually they'll get to acceptance and move on.
I'm not sure if trolling works when you're just making yourself look silly. I'm not young though, so maybe that's how it's done now.
No, I think your mistake was that you made a logical leap that made sense to you without realising that it was it was not an obvious one and didn't make sense to other people. And without substantial clarification about how you made that logical leap, it just looked like a load of nonsense.
I have not yet seen any compelling evidence of unequal enforcement of laws.
No neutral authority such as a court has offered a judgement. That just leaves the balance of available evidence, and the only evidence in favour is the say-so of some Republican poll watchers: their evidence alone isn't good enough. We were told months ago by Trump that there was a deliberate plan to portray the election as fraudulent. And lo and behold, here the activists are as ground troops in the long-planned propaganda campaign: lying, exaggerating and distorting to try to create the image of fraud when no significant fraud can be found in reality. The emptiness of their claims is why Trump has about 50 failed hearings and court cases for approximately just one minor success. They are not credible and not trustworthy.
People would probably engage with me if I pissed in the crisps aisle as Tesco, but I don't reckon they'd see me as a winner.
This might be proven to your satisfaction if a case involving the TCF center makes it before a judge, and a democrat witness is called or cross-examined.
Why do you believe that the republican workers and poll watchers are lying, exaggerating, and distorting?
Because they're republicans?
1) How can a hearing "fail"?
2) One of the senators/congressmen, Lawful Evil in the meme, made a very similar point. "Why should we believe you when your team has 30,40,50, whatever the number was, failed lawsuits? Guiliani's response was "We only have 3".
Also
Last edited:
True. You can knock a troll on his ass and he'll pretend that's where he wanted to be all along.
Because existing procedures have already accomplished safety & security, and this additional enormous expenditure would do nothing: if those soldiers had been in place, you'd be here insinuating that they're all part of the plot.
Yes, Giuliani has been quite poor at keeping track of detail, I agree. Remember when the Judge asked him what standard of scrutiny should be applied (rational basis, intermediate, or strict) and he replied "the normal one"? Then seemed to admit he didn't know what the Judge meant by "scrutiny"?
Probably because every time I've watched/read their testimony, it's been riddled with really basic failures of understanding. Such as saying that using a USB is "illegal", or complaining about "due process" when they're prevented from writing up lists of voters on notepaper.
It looks to me like they're not attempting to deceive anybody or anything, but that they've been tremendously poorly trained on electoral procedure, security, and data handling, such that they have almost no understanding of what they're meant to be looking out for.
For paper ballots, mostly.
What's unsafe and unsecure about this election, specifically, is the unprecedented numbers of mail-in ballots, which is conveniently thanks to covid.
For years, as I have shown, mail-in ballots were called unsecure and open to fraud. Everyone knew this. The media knew this. MIT knew this. But then, once covid happened, all of a sudden the narrative was pushed that they're "safe and secure" without any security upgrades or changes to the system.
In Afghanistan, you vote with your fingerprint. There are zero cases of dead people voting, people voting twice, or non-existent people voting from fake addresses. Snipers sit up on buildings and watch the polls. Why are their elections more secure than ours?
No, I haven't seen that. Can you link the video?
Such as?
Its funny 'cause I posted this exact video like a week ago, and the exact same arguments were made. Just goes to show you how temporally challenged some people are. Still haven't even caught up with last week.
I wonder if this artist is a user on the site, he seems to have houseman figured out.
Because your gouvernments (that is mostly statewise ones) have wasted every election reform of the last couple decades to influence the outcome of the election via redistricting and ease of voting for certain groups instead of trying to actually get a safe, equal, convenient and fast election done.
American elections are an embarrasment. At least half the world does it better.
But do you know what would not heelp at all ? Military at the polling places. What would those soldiers even be supposed to do there ?
- Status