Election results discussion thread (and sadly the inevitable aftermath)
- Thread starter Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)
- Start date
- Status
Well sue me I'm the lowest form of twit because I don't find the yelling "President Cheeto" or whatever people have taken to using as some grand highly crafted joke. But hey as you understood it guess you're the denizens of TERF island you referenced. Tell me have you managed to have your extra toes dealt with yet or have you decided to keep them?
The fact that people can explain, in detail, how unequal enforcement of laws targeting ethnic groups is discrimination, but all of that is curiously absent here, shows the hypocrisy and partisanship at work.
Look, here's him talking a big game about discrimination in law enforcement, talking about "policing that widely targets certain groups", but when it comes to republicans? "They shouldn't have broken the rules".
Or is it that unequal enforcement of rules and laws is okay as long as nobody dies? Is that the line you draw between "acceptable discrimination" and "unacceptable discrimination"?
Last edited:
You fucking suck at this man. Literally all you got is the fucking reversal, even when it takes five leaps to even fucking find your conclusion along the way.
Well you suck and pulling down statues considering how many of them have hit you on the head.
I am certain it is only open to contain this nonsense. At least I really don't want a new thread popping up everytime some twitter user posts something about alleged fraud.
Still hope it is over after the 14th.
As Houseman says, Republican poll watchers broke the regulations and received a proportionate and legal response of being removed from procedings, which is exactly the same as the cops being able to arbitrarily shoot people dead on the mere suspicion they committed a trivial offence.
Because apparently, anyone who deserved a punishment for their sin means any sin can fairly deserve any punishment. To suggest that it is right someone gets 2 years in jail for burglary means vigilantes can lynch people for dropping litter.
No, I don't understand that reasoning either.
The Escapist’s commitment to letting its user base slag each other off continues to amaze me.
Mm... Love the standard of people Republicans are relying on to make their case there's been election fraud.
I don't understand why they gave Sidney Powell the boot. She was the perfect fit to represent their claims.
Consider it a service, the staff is limiting the spread of inane conspiracy theories to just one thread, as opposed to having a certain someone start a new one every five minutes when some random fool posts on twitter.
Well then: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/482569-senate-gop-blocks-three-election-security-bills
And by the way, not all voting machines are created equally. For instance, those Dominion machines that Republicans have decided to demonize, actually have VVPAT, so...too bad, so sad.
OK. I see you're in full meltdown mode, so i'm just gonna back away from the conversation, slowly.
I don't know of any "pee tape". I only heard he allegedly shat himself in the public.
Tstorm always struck me as a republican first, and "trumpist" when its convenient, and since mainstream reps don't seem to be disputing the outcome of presidential election...
The one about Russian prostitutes doing something involving urination that Russian intelligence had blackmail tapes of from just before he got to be PotUS, IIRC.
Denied by the right, because obviously, and by certain on the left because you're not allowed to say that Russian intelligence was interfering in elections of interest to them (you know, their job) that time to any extent.
This isn't even a comeback. It's a non sequitur. Revnak is right, you really do suck at this.
My only mistake was accusing you of saying "they deserve anything they get". You latched on to the word "anything" and thought that it literally meant "anything".
In reality, I meant any appropriate legal consequence.
Do you not maintain that unequal enforcement of laws is one of the ways discrimination happens? Because that's what I quoted you saying. The Republicans were discriminated against due to this unequal enforcement, in the same way that Black Americans are discriminated against due to the unequal enforcement of laws. That was my only point.
But you are, and this is and was not a mistake, using the exact same logic and using the exact same words that racists use to justify discrimination, unequal enforcement, and police brutality: that they deserved it because they broke the rules. You yourself said those words.
You want armed soldiers at every poll station throughout the country (& the additional time and expenditure to train them on electoral security), solely to address an issue that nobody has successfully demonstrated actually exists.
You know, of course, that had there been soldiers stationed at every polling spot, and the result was the same, Trump and his followers would just be alleging that they're all in on the conspiracy too.
- Status