Maybe there was, maybe (unlikely) there was not stealing by HRC.
Of course there wasn't.
Dictators can fiddle elections because they have the power to control the electoral process from start to finish, and law enforcement, media and whatever else they need. The Democrats very plainly do not have that sort of control. Amassing enough fraudulent votes to swing an election is really difficult. In a country such as the USA, it's a minimum of hundreds of thousands of votes across numerous states. That requires huge logistical effort, a huge number of people, who are supposed to carry this off whilst operating under mass scrutiny. An operation of that magnitude would be cracked open and exposed as easily as an egg under a 4-pound hammer.
But this really happened 4 years ago: it was noted that the process did not exist to know how many votes you needed to steal ahead of time. That has changed. It really has.
No, it hasn't. No-one can know how many votes they need.
They would have to assume the polls are reliable - they're normally relaible to a couple of percent, although this year they were unusually inaccurate. They would also need to know turnout, which is vital for any such calculations, and also hard to predict, because that will also completely screw calculations. For instance, the polls showed Trump and Biden level-pegging in Ohio and Georgia. But Biden won Georgia by a whisker and lost Ohio by about 8 points. That tells you something about just how hard it is to predict how many false votes would be needed to win.
But if Georgia did Un Constitutional things to arrive at that vote that otherwise, would have happened, it is Maine that got screwed. Sort of... more below.
This also is basically junk.
If the Texas suit does not have "standing" - which, let's face it, the people presenting it must have suspected - then there was an easy remedy. Hand the legal arguments to literally any Pennsylvania / Michigan / etc. citizen willing to put it forward instead: it's not like a lot of those legal arguments really change. The president has asked for a mass of funding to do precisely things like that.
Although, of course, it has been pointed out that the resources deployed by the Trump campaign and Republicans for legal challenges were remarkably threadbare: the planning and infrastructure simply had not been laid down to launch the sort of legal assault that the supposed severity warranted. So either they were completely incompetent, or it's all just theatre and they weren't really willing to put their money where their mouths were. And it's the latter, isn't it?
