Ireland and Northern Ireland. The 6 counties managed to have worse figures than the Republic because of the UK's cack handed approach to dealing with the pandemic.De facto island, island, island, island, island...
Ireland and Northern Ireland. The 6 counties managed to have worse figures than the Republic because of the UK's cack handed approach to dealing with the pandemic.De facto island, island, island, island, island...
Oh, hey look, I googled Ireland vs Northern Ireland covid, and the top result is this: https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and...better-than-the-republic-of-ireland-1.4351612Ireland and Northern Ireland. The 6 counties managed to have worse figures than the Republic because of the UK's cack handed approach to dealing with the pandemic.
Oh so we're back to mortality being the only metric that matters anymore. Can't keep up. Happy Christmas.Oh, hey look, I googled Ireland vs Northern Ireland covid, and the top result is this: https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and...better-than-the-republic-of-ireland-1.4351612
Which mathed out covid deaths by age demographics and found the two parts to be functionally identical.
Care to make an argument?Oh so we're back to mortality being the only metric that matters anymore. Can't keep up. Happy Christmas.
You really need an argument that peoples' lives can be negatively impacted outside of literal death?Care to make an argument?
Do you? You shared one hastily Googled articleCare to make an argument?
Oh are we doing math to justify our position? Then how about some napkin math?Oh, hey look, I googled Ireland vs Northern Ireland covid, and the top result is this: https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and...better-than-the-republic-of-ireland-1.4351612
Which mathed out covid deaths by age demographics and found the two parts to be functionally identical.
I direct you back to my post about the video...I direct you back to the video
---Pretty funny how Biden getting 85% of the vote in a precinct is "suspicious" and not normal while him getting 11% (meaning Trump got the rest) in another isn't suspicious.
Norway and South Korea aren't islands. There's plenty of other countries that handled it better, literally 140 out of 150 have. Germany has handled it far better, they're in the middle of Europe. An island doesn't really matter much once the virus gets there, Tokyo has more people than NYC. Once the virus is in either Tokyo or NYC, the same mitigations will have the same effect. There's one study that points to half of Tokyo being infected, even if just 1 million people have gotten infected that would be a fatality rate of 0.06%.De facto island, island, island, island, island... have you considered the possibility that there are more factors at play than just national level government response? Perhaps geography could play a role? Population demographics? You think any country could have just behaved like South Korea and had no problems? That's not how reality works. There are no panaceas.
It did not give people money to make up the difference. It gave people a bit of money. Nowhere near enough.Yes it did.
No, but you do need to make an argument someone does need to make an argument from the different metric before it can be considered. The post I had responded to with data just sort of broadly asserted one place was doing substantially better than another without listing what standards were being used to judge. I repsonded with a comparison that should them not being terribly different by at least one standard, and got back basically "well yeah, if you judge it that way rather than the other ways". Well, ok then, what other ways shall we compare? There are plenty of options, if people would like to argue from a different perspective. It's not an argument to tell me I'm judging by the wrong standards without demostrating the right standards or atleast saying why the standards are wrong.You really need an argument that peoples' lives can be negatively impacted outside of literal death?
The article I presented was arguing exactly this though: the mortality rate of covid-19 isn't constant. It varies immensely by demographic, especially by age demographics, and if you break the two regions down into age brackets, you find parallel deaths per million. Mortality rate of the virus isn't constant across groups, geographies, or time. It isn't a fixed number you can hold steady under all conditions.Without a change in the mortality rate, then it's absurdly obvious the way you prevent deaths by COVID is to prevent infections by COVID.
Your article does funi math to say the virus is just as deadly to 65 year olds on either side of a border to ignore the fact that the virus is killing more people per capita on one particular side of a border because the rate of infection is much higher on that particular side of the border. It's a nonsense distraction of the third kind of lie, statistics.No, but you do need to make an argument someone does need to make an argument from the different metric before it can be considered. The post I had responded to with data just sort of broadly asserted one place was doing substantially better than another without listing what standards were being used to judge. I repsonded with a comparison that should them not being terribly different by at least one standard, and got back basically "well yeah, if you judge it that way rather than the other ways". Well, ok then, what other ways shall we compare? There are plenty of options, if people would like to argue from a different perspective. It's not an argument to tell me I'm judging by the wrong standards without demostrating the right standards or atleast saying why the standards are wrong.
I get more empty responses than I do actual arguments, sometimes 2:1.
The article I presented was arguing exactly this though: the mortality rate of covid-19 isn't constant. It varies immensely by demographic, especially by age demographics, and if you break the two regions down into age brackets, you find parallel deaths per million. Mortality rate of the virus isn't constant across groups, geographies, or time. It isn't a fixed number you can hold steady under all conditions.
The major risk category for covid-19 mortality is age. According to statistics, the figure for 80+ (mortality rate ~15%) is about 3.1% of the population of Ireland, and 3.8% of the population of Northern Ireland. If we then look at 70-79 (~5% mortality), it's 6.6% in Ireland and 6.3% in NI.Your article does funi math to say the virus is just as deadly to 65 year olds on either side of a border to ignore the fact that the virus is killing more people per capita on one particular side of a border because the rate of infection is much higher on that particular side of the border. It's a nonsense distraction of the third kind of lie, statistics.
Eh, I'm afraid to hope. We need courts willing to uphold the law. We've heard that the USSC is too afraid of rioters to do their job. So, no matter what happens, all we can do is try to be our best selves. Stay productive, alert and vocal.Giuliani: New developments in election fraud case coming up | One America News Network
Rudy Giuliani said shocking new revelations of election fraud are set to be released in the coming few days.www.oann.com
Yeah but its Rudy Coludy saying it. So unless someone with credibility says they got something I'm holding my breath.Giuliani: New developments in election fraud case coming up | One America News Network
Rudy Giuliani said shocking new revelations of election fraud are set to be released in the coming few days.www.oann.com
Nope and you know this because specific examples were given and links were shared. How is it people still think you guys are worth talking to? Like 4000 posts of this nonsense.Would this sort of thing be the sort of thing making up most of the 175 issues referenced in this thread?
And I recall going through a few of those links and pointing out how they were half-truths made only to mislead.Nope and you know this because specific examples were given and links were shared.
WTF I love unverified twitter rumors now!We've heard that the USSC is too afraid of rioters to do their job.
Isn't this literally your whole shtick?half-truths made only to mislead.
I mean if the Supreme court decides to suspend democracy and just award Trump a second term then there should be riots. Its sacrificing democracy just so an incompetent and extreme corrupt individual can have four more years in office.Eh, I'm afraid to hope. We need courts willing to uphold the law. We've heard that the USSC is too afraid of rioters to do their job