Yeah, I hear you. It would be one thing if they just restricted it to sensible camo patterns, but you know they won't do that.
And I do agree with you about the no F-22s, but I honestly wouldn't mind having other things to choose from than M16s. The only real reason I'd want the USA in a game...
Alright, new info.
Looks like they're not going to have a campaign mode at launch, pity that. They're also talking about giving the game micro-CANCER, even if it's going to be cosmetics only.
The big thing for me is the starting factions at release: Russia, Germany and Poland. No France...
What do you mean by that? I'm just saying that I hope that WW3 here can be a more polished, better made near-future military shooter with large open maps and lots of vehicles.
You know, like BF2142 or Frontlines. And for the record, I liked Frontlines, but I also understand that it's nothing...
The original RAGE was by no means a bad game, I just never figured it warranted a sequel.
After that trailer though, the sequel might as well not exist to me. What the cringe, Bethesda?
You couldn't pay me enough to have any involvement with that place. I wouldn't even want to witness it via unmanned probe from the other side of the universe.
What Souplex refuses to understand, quite plainly. Without the waifus and the fanservice, Fire Emblem would be treated the same way F-Zero is:
Smash memes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.