The same should apply to female genitals then?Sean Deli said:Yeah, I don't understand how a word "tit" can be used as a slur.
Tits are awesome, go team Boobs! I think the biggest misanthrope in the world, after wishing for our planet to boil in the never-ending volcano of his liquid hate so that it would be cleaned of the cesspool we call civilization, would then admit that "Boobs are nice, though."
It is, see how much butthurt she is in the last panel.erttheking said:Really is a cut throat world that we've carved for ourselves isn't it?
I don't suppose you'd mind explaining that.erttheking said:Really is a cut throat world that we've carved for ourselves isn't it?
God damn it. This is the second time in two days I've spat coke all over my keyboard. Putting a punchline like that in the first panel is unfair. You owe me a new keyboard, Grey!They're both full of tits
No, of course not. Unlike tits and asses, cocks and vulvas do not have an associated mechanism of instinctive attraction built by thousand-year-long evolution going for them.thaluikhain said:The same should apply to female genitals then?Sean Deli said:Yeah, I don't understand how a word "tit" can be used as a slur.
Tits are awesome, go team Boobs! I think the biggest misanthrope in the world, after wishing for our planet to boil in the never-ending volcano of his liquid hate so that it would be cleaned of the cesspool we call civilization, would then admit that "Boobs are nice, though."
Of course, it could be saying that Gearbox likes filling their stuff with tits...they made Duke Nukem Forever, after all.
I thought Ashley is a pretty common boys name? Or at least nothing unusual.RatherDull said:His name is Ashley? Dude, that is awesome. If I ever have a boy, his name is Ashley. And if anyone has a problem with that then they can deal with me.
Tit is pejorative slang for an idiot. Pussy is pejorative slang for a coward. **** is pejorative slang for an unpleasant person. Saying 'Yeah, I don't understand how a word "tit" can be used as a slur.' can easily be applied to those other two words if people feel like it. Also attraction to secondary sexual characteristics is no more universally ingrained on the biological level than attraction to primary sexual characteristics nor would that be a validating reason for them to be any more deserving of reverence if it was.Sean Deli said:No, of course not. Unlike tits and asses, cocks and vulvas do not have an associated mechanism of instinctive attraction built by thousand-year-long evolution going for them.thaluikhain said:The same should apply to female genitals then?Sean Deli said:Yeah, I don't understand how a word "tit" can be used as a slur.
Tits are awesome, go team Boobs! I think the biggest misanthrope in the world, after wishing for our planet to boil in the never-ending volcano of his liquid hate so that it would be cleaned of the cesspool we call civilization, would then admit that "Boobs are nice, though."
Of course, it could be saying that Gearbox likes filling their stuff with tits...they made Duke Nukem Forever, after all.
You might be very fond of vulvas on an intellectual level - by appreciating the fine mechanics of this body part or the impact on human cultural development from the neolithic age all the way till the modern time.
But attraction to tits and asses is rigged in all of us from birth till death on the biological level*
So, to sum up my answer to your question - no, boobs are more special than vulvas.
This answer was brought to you by "And now you wish you didn't know that" foundation. Tune in next TMI-Tuesday, to learn more things you wish you didn't know.
*as with everything in human biology, outliers exist in every population. If you feel no instinctive appreciation of boobs and asses - you are ok, you are just different from the median. Different does not mean better or worse, it just means different.
I really don't see how...DVS BSTrD said:And hey, "the xenomorph" would be a great name for a push-up bra.