Never attribute competence to Microsoft when it can easily be put down to incompetence =D I could never believe that MS had the finesse to pull off any sort of sophisticated long-term planningGethsemani said:Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. - Hanlon's Razor
Yes, I really do think the MS marketing department is that much out of touch with what their consumers want.
It's somewhat insightful to get this glimpse into how insane the contents of one's post can seem when they see everything as a stark realm of black and white: where if you're aren't actively fanwanking over consoles than you're some kind of PC elitist.LordTerminal said:Sorry Yahtzee but wasting your novelist experience dressing up yet another PC elitist load of BS like the last 3 times does not magically excuse for well making another PC elitist load of BS.
You forgot the second half: Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation. At least, not the first time. Ian Fleming further explained it as "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."Gethsemani said:Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. - Hanlon's Razor
and what exactly is wrong? You forgot to mention it. All I see is Yahtzee's theory and people commenting. Questions of plausibility haven't been brought up because who's to say how plausible it is? I dunno know, your acting as if you know better. Mr Smarty Pants parading his fat ass, thinking he can show a superior opinion but forgetting to point out the holes.LordTerminal said:Except this is the fourth or fifth time he's wasted an article/video on this topic and it's always the same answer. This isn't seeing in black and white, this is just basically pointing out what's really wrong with this "story" and that Yahtzee needs to get off his soapbox.