Personally, I would've docked more points for the racism against giant insects. It's not even like they're trying to be inclusive. Giant insects are becoming a more important market of video game buyers, you know.Jimothy Sterling said:There are four character classes to choose from. The Ranger is a standard soldier, employing conventional assault rifles and missile launchers in the war against giant insects. The Ranger is a support character, calling in air strikes and summoning vehicles that can deal major damage to giant insects. The Fencer is a heavily armored, slow moving warrior that carries both a shield and high damage weapon, bringing massive firepower to the giant insects. My personal favorite, the Wing Diver, is a lightly armored flying soldier, vulnerable to attack from giant insects, but very fast and armed with fairly entertaining energy weapons, all of which prove effective against giant insects.
Well, okay. But it's still better than if it were the same level of quality, except you're shooting brown people in a desert. Right?Jimothy Sterling said:Earth Defense Force 2025 Review - Giant Insects
Giant Insects.
Read Full Article
Plot twist: The insects are actually regular size; you're just incredibly tiny!Earth Defense Force 2025 is another in a line of terrible games about shooting giant insects while being told to shoot giant insects by people who talk constantly about how giant the giant insects are.
Giant insects.
A valid point indeed. Kill soldier X, defeat space alien Y, destroy robot Z. Pretty standard for any shooter to have fodder, but EDF is a constant horde/survival mode. When I played EDF long ago I compared the game to Contra; shoot everything avoid getting hit. Sure there was a story, but did anyone really pay attention to it? Still EDF's constant chatter was bothersome after awhile. And yes, many of the weapons were utterly useless although novel.Shjade said:I mean, it's not like some of the most popular game franchises are all about humans shooting other humans on the thinnest of pretexts. Who'd be interested in something so vile and unsympathetic?
I am the same, I bought 2017 out of the bargin bin for $5 and probably won't spend more then $10 on this one if I owned a console. Mind you I couldn't stand playing it solo it was always more fun with a friend and then throwing something at them when they killed you.Andy of Comix Inc said:Spiders aren't insects. Robots aren't insects. A far more accurate description of all the foes you fight are "giant chungus," really.
Anyway: this game looks like entertaining, daft fun. I just wish it weren't full-price. I paid $10 for EDF 2017 and that's about what it's worth, as much as I loved the hell out of it. EDF 2025 should be a budget title, or a downloadable thing. As much fun as I'm certain I'll have with it.
The thing is... in a good manshoot game, there's a certain tactile feel to killing. Blowing zombies away with a shotgun. The blood splatter in Counter Strike. When I tried EDF, it felt... soft. The way the ants splattered, the way the guns felt. It all felt soft.Shjade said:I mean, it's not like some of the most popular game franchises are all about humans shooting other humans on the thinnest of pretexts. Who'd be interested in something so vile and unsympathetic?
...actually I was just poking fun at Call of Duty and its ilk.RA92 said:The thing is... in a good manshoot game, there's a certain tactile feel to killing. Blowing zombies away with a shotgun. The blood splatter in Counter Strike. When I tried EDF, it felt... soft. The way the ants splattered, the way the guns felt. It all felt soft.Shjade said:I mean, it's not like some of the most popular game franchises are all about humans shooting other humans on the thinnest of pretexts. Who'd be interested in something so vile and unsympathetic?