Flat Earth Birth Control

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
Flat Earth Birth Control

If you don't like the joke Allah tell another one.

Read Full Article
 

Tireseas_v1legacy

Plop plop plop
Sep 28, 2009
2,419
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
I'm sure this comic has context, but I don't know what it is.
Coughs up a little blood... [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/528.854015-Supreme-Court-Rules-In-Favor-of-Hobby-Lobby]
 

mjharper

Can
Apr 28, 2013
172
0
0
I essentially agree. There's a perverse genius at work here, finding new ways to put the rights of companies about the rights of individuals.

Is it really eroding the division between state and religion, though? To me it looks like driving a wedge between them so hard that there could now be effectively two states: a secular one, which must obey laws, and a religious one, which gets to pick and choose which laws it accepts.
 

MCerberus

New member
Jun 26, 2013
1,168
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
I'm sure this comic has context, but I don't know what it is.
The US supreme court has ruled that companies (most notably Hobby Lobby) are not required to provide birth control to female employees due to religious grounds because they are a "closely-held company".
 

Amaror

New member
Apr 15, 2011
1,509
0
0
shouldn't the link provide context for the strip. You know, instead of linking to a video of the game forest gump.
I think you might have forgotten to put in a new link since the last clip.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
MCerberus said:
canadamus_prime said:
I'm sure this comic has context, but I don't know what it is.
The US supreme court has ruled that companies (most notably Hobby Lobby) are not required to provide birth control to female employees due to religious grounds because they are a "closely-held company".
"closely-held company"? What the hell does that mean?
 

MCerberus

New member
Jun 26, 2013
1,168
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
MCerberus said:
canadamus_prime said:
I'm sure this comic has context, but I don't know what it is.
The US supreme court has ruled that companies (most notably Hobby Lobby) are not required to provide birth control to female employees due to religious grounds because they are a "closely-held company".
"closely-held company"? What the hell does that mean?
Extremely small ownership group, no public stock.

It should be noted that the family that owns Hobby Lobby hasn't ever addressed medical use of hormonal birth control, and believe that anti-ovulation pills are abortion, among other things. Oh, and their health plans cover Viagra, meaning that they subscribe to the medical opinion that dealing with your sexual desires can be good for your health..

Oh, and I'm just going to get the EVERY TIME THIS HAPPENS thing out of the way: CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE. THE PRECEDENT THAT SAYS THIS DOESN'T EXIST. IT WAS WRITTEN AS A 'WHAT-IF' BY A CLERK BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT REFUSED TO HEAR THE CASE.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Amaror said:
shouldn't the link provide context for the strip. You know, instead of linking to a video of the game forest gump.
I think you might have forgotten to put in a new link since the last clip.
Actually, that was the funniest part of today's comic. Obsessive callbacks are good comedy.

OT: dem tags. How does it feel to know that you run something that is, and forever will be, the flame-baitiest content the Escapist will ever release? :D
 

wetfart

New member
Jul 11, 2010
307
0
0
Hobby Lobby covers the following forms of contraception:
Male condoms
Female condoms
Diaphragms with spermicide
Sponges with spermicide
Cervical caps with spermicide
Spermicide alone
Birth-control pills with estrogen and progestin (?Combined Pill)
Birth-control pills with progestin alone (?The Mini Pill)
Birth control pills (extended/continuous use)
Contraceptive patches
Contraceptive rings
Progestin injections
Implantable rods
Vasectomies
Female sterilization surgeries
Female sterilization implants

The forms of contraception that were opposed were:
Plan B (morning after pill)
Ella (another emergency contraceptive)
Copper Intrauterine Device
IUD with progestin

The reason they were opposed was because these forms of birth control can cause or are akin to abortion.
 

Doclector

New member
Aug 22, 2009
5,010
0
0
This issue makes me so angry. It shouldn't be an issue. Shouldn't be a question. In short, the people who got this law through, and the companies who use it, are scum, complete, sub human, worthless little shits who should, at very least, be chased out of civilised life and forced to survive on their own. I give it three days until they kill each other.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
wetfart said:
Hobby Lobby covers the following forms of contraception:
Male condoms
Female condoms
Diaphragms with spermicide
Sponges with spermicide
Cervical caps with spermicide
Spermicide alone
Birth-control pills with estrogen and progestin (?Combined Pill)
Birth-control pills with progestin alone (?The Mini Pill)
Birth control pills (extended/continuous use)
Contraceptive patches
Contraceptive rings
Progestin injections
Implantable rods
Vasectomies
Female sterilization surgeries
Female sterilization implants

The forms of contraception that were opposed were:
Plan B (morning after pill)
Ella (another emergency contraceptive)
Copper Intrauterine Device
IUD with progestin

The reason they were opposed was because these forms of birth control can cause or are akin to abortion.
Well, that's a bit of a kick in the teeth, isn't it?

Although, as the comic indicates, I think more people are wringing their hands about the "because religion" aspect.
 

Robyrt

New member
Aug 1, 2008
568
0
0
Caramel Frappe said:
I puked a little bit. I thought it was making fun of private companies that somehow gotten religion involved.
Didn't imagine it actually relating to a public company where now... they can use religious beliefs as an excuse to abuse people. I mean, didn't the Supreme Court realize how easy it'll be for companies to take advantage of this?

I'm not even a scholar, or someone with a high degree in law ... let alone politics. But as a person with common sense, I see this going downhill fast. Religion is free to those who believe in what they want, but don't let companies to use religion as a source of power. THAT is going to screw people over, just you wait.
Hobby Lobby isn't a public company, it's a closely held private company that is essentially owned by one family. The Supreme Court recognized that access to contraception is a legitimate government interest, but ruled that there were other, less restrictive methods to provide it than requiring employers to do so.

This decision is a lot narrower than people want to pretend it is. The law already stipulates that the government will purchase contraceptives for religious non-profits, now they just have to do so for closely held private companies as well. And it requires a "sincerely held religious belief," so you could safely challenge a mysterious conversion to Christian Science / Wahhabi Islam / Scientology / etc.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
wetfart said:
Hobby Lobby covers the following forms of contraception:
Male condoms
Female condoms
Diaphragms with spermicide
Sponges with spermicide
Cervical caps with spermicide
Spermicide alone
Birth-control pills with estrogen and progestin (?Combined Pill)
Birth-control pills with progestin alone (?The Mini Pill)
Birth control pills (extended/continuous use)
Contraceptive patches
Contraceptive rings
Progestin injections
Implantable rods
Vasectomies
Female sterilization surgeries
Female sterilization implants

The forms of contraception that were opposed were:
Plan B (morning after pill)
Ella (another emergency contraceptive)
Copper Intrauterine Device
IUD with progestin

The reason they were opposed was because these forms of birth control can cause or are akin to abortion.
And last time I checked abortion was legal wasn't it? This still feels like religion forcing it's values on people.
 

maxben

New member
Jun 9, 2010
529
0
0
All this decision does is make healthcare even more complicated and bureaucratic in the West. I hope everyone understands that. The more people fight for the right to have exceptions to the law, and the more complex those exceptions are and the more requirements there are to reach those exceptions, the harder and more costly the system is to maintain. This is a win for the religious faction, good for them, but everyone else is going to lose in the long run.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Edit: On second thought, I think I'm going to stay out of this one. :p

As fun of a bees' nest as this may or may not stir up, I'm still looking forward to the next WGDF.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,111
3,844
118
RJ 17 said:
As fun of a bees' nest as this may or may not stir up, I'm still looking forward to the next WGDF.
Yeah, but then they might not actually make another, have to take controversies where you can find them.

...

Does this ruling apply to strange religions made up for this purpose? OTOH, I don't think the US actually bans mind control rays.
 

unacomn

New member
Mar 3, 2008
974
0
0
Damn! My country's kind messed up, but it's good to know at least we have a leg up on the "civilized" west in terms of gender equality... also internet speeds. Like, really, you can't even by anything under 50mb/s.