Don't know if it'll make you feel better but it was the forumites who voted DA:I as GOTY that time, rather then the escapist site itself :/XDSkyFreak said:I bet y'all 100$ Fallout 4 will receive "best rpg" at the very least from the majority of outlets (escapists included, don't think I forgot the inquisition fiasco ... how the fuck any self respecting outlet can call something that has berely been out for a few weeks and no one but the most insane speed runners has had time to finish best anything of the year, let alone best game is beyond me)
I've long accepted the fact that AAA games nowdays are made for the magical extended audience people, having a more or less defined fanbase and making games with the appropriate budget to match is so last decade. We need to make investor confidence high people, INCREASE THE MARKETING BUDGET!XDSkyFreak said:But hey, what the fuck do I know right? I mean I've only been around to play games since the NES days, it's not like I've been forced to see franchise after franchise I love get dumbed down and reduced to the most bland, wattered down "Streamlined" experience that even a retarded 2 year old surviving on a diet of his own farts can play!
I don't get this arguments at all. Fallout 4 is not a shooter. It doesn't play like a shooter, and the emphasis is clearly not on the shooting mechanics. I swear, they take mild steps to make the shooting mechanics not play like ass, and people act like they've turned into call of duty. It's just a slightly improved version of the last game.XDSkyFreak said:and there you've glanced on the head of the nail with the hammer. Fallout 4 is a shooter. a preety decent if not generic and boring shooter with a preety decent bullet time mechanic with some semblance of rpg elements bolted on the side. And that is all there is to it, Calling this ... abortion an RPG is worthy of hanging IMO, but just you wait for the anual masturbation contest ... I bet y'all 100$ Fallout 4 will receive "best rpg" at the very least from the majority of outlets (escapists included, don't think I forgot the inquisition fiasco ... how the fuck any self respecting outlet can call something that has berely been out for a few weeks and no one but the most insane speed runners has had time to finish best anything of the year, let alone best game is beyond me) ... and this in the year CD Projekt Red basicaly came around and pimp slaped the entire gaming industry in the face with their sausage and showed them not just how to make a fantastic RPG (take notes retardware and console-esda) but also how to be competent fucking devs and make a good game people want to buy. But hey, what the fuck do I know right? I mean I've only been around to play games since the NES days, it's not like I've been forced to see franchise after franchise I love get dumbed down and reduced to the most bland, wattered down "Streamlined" experience that even a retarded 2 year old surviving on a diet of his own farts can play!
Wait, didn't 3 come out before New Vegas?Devieus said:I haven't played it, only watched a stream of it. It seemed weird the guns and clothes were left behind, usually the things you want to have as many of as possible.
I bet this game would've worked better as a spin-off or new IP, like it seems like a spin-off of Fallout 3, which in turn is a spin-off of Fallout NV, and that's a spin-off of Fallout 2, the sequel to Fallout.
Still, it looks prettier, there's more than 2 colors and not everything always looks like shit.