The way copyright law works, they're obligated to.gigastar said:Honestly you would think that with Nintendos historic attitude to unlisenced ports/remakes of its old games that fans wouldnt bother knowing they would get served a C&D the moment Nint peeked out of its own rectum.
I wasnt talking about Nint's copyright obligation, i was talking about the fans apparent willingness to devote time and energy to a project that could be shot down at a moments notice.Souplex said:The way copyright law works, they're obligated to.gigastar said:Honestly you would think that with Nintendos historic attitude to unlisenced ports/remakes of its old games that fans wouldnt bother knowing they would get served a C&D the moment Nint peeked out of its own rectum.
If you "Fail to defend your copyright", that "Failure" can be used as evidence against you in future copyright cases. Companies are forced to be insanely overzealous with their application of copyright.
That's only half true.Souplex said:The way copyright law works, they're obligated to.
If you "Fail to defend your copyright", that "Failure" can be used as evidence against you in future copyright cases. Companies are forced to be insanely overzealous with their application of copyright.
I'm not so sure I buy this anymore. If companies hated this so much then they could lobby for a change. Instead their lobbying for stricter copyright laws that give them more power. The truth is that most companies love being able to sue people into oblivion. I'm currently convinced that, while you are correct about the law, companies have no desire to change it. It's a convenient PR excuse for them to do what they would have been doing anyway.Souplex said:The way copyright law works, they're obligated to.gigastar said:Honestly you would think that with Nintendos historic attitude to unlisenced ports/remakes of its old games that fans wouldnt bother knowing they would get served a C&D the moment Nint peeked out of its own rectum.
If you "Fail to defend your copyright", that "Failure" can be used as evidence against you in future copyright cases. Companies are forced to be insanely overzealous with their application of copyright.
God, there's something kinda beautiful about how much of a clusterfuck every last one of these cases ends up being. At this point it's pretty much a solid given that any time "DMCA" shows up in a sentence it'll be followed up by "Something really, really, really dumb."VaporWare said:Things that are peculiar and possibly worth talking about in this case:
The AM2R project has been public for eight years, and this is, so far as I'm aware, the first move Nintendo has made regarding them directly at all.
A DMCA takedown was filed against the download, but they have not actually received a Cease and Desist order.
The DMCA may not even be the correct framework, since the AM2R project doesn't actually use any original assets. At all. No code, no art, no sound, everything in AM2R was made by the AM2R people themselves, making the whole thing more akin to a song cover than to piracy.
This is far more a trademark issue than a copyright issue, which puts it in a /very/ peculiar space since, again, nothing was done about it for eight years before the finished download was made available, after which Nintendo may have used the wrong legal framework to complain about it.
Our best guess out here is that one of Nintendo's legal department watchdogs mistook AM2R for an actual pirated Nintendo product and filed a DMCA.
Guess we'll just have to see how things shake out from here.
Now you know how us Streets of Rage fans felt, especially in regards to Bomberman's phenomenal remake.aegix drakan said:It wouldn't be so harsh if Nintendo was actually doing something with the series. (Federation Force doesn't count.)
There's a lot of misunderstanding about how Trademark, Copyright and IP Law in general actually work (there's a very strong tendency for people to conflate them, since they generally relate to the same things, but cover different aspects of a thing and how they're used), and it's worth noting that 'video games' are still a very young part of entertainment media. I'm hoping this will go in a direction that helps establish some better precedent (for instance, handling this sort of fan-project in a manner akin to how the music industry handles cover versions of songs), but a lot depends on how the conversation goes once Nintendo is actually 'aware' of all this.Mike Richards said:God, there's something kinda beautiful about how much of a clusterfuck every last one of these cases ends up being. At this point it's pretty much a solid given that any time "DMCA" shows up in a sentence it'll be followed up by "Something really, really, really dumb."
Of course, it's not like Nintendo could just /buy/ the project since quite literally all of the work has been done for them and I doubt that would cost more then the actual production costs. Not to mention the fact that it's mere existence/popularity already proves there's a market. Hell, that would have been a day one buy on 3DS for me easy. But this would require Nintendo to not be Nintendo.
Oh well, maybe we'll get something good for the 50th...
You understand Nintendo and Square Enix are two different companies, right?JCAll said:At least they waited until the thing was out before shutting it down. We all know nothing can ever be removed from the internet once it's out. I'd like to think that was a conscious decision by Nintendo, but I'm probably over thinking it.
And yes, I'm still bitter about the Chrono Trigger Remake Project.
You misread the post I think.Imperioratorex Caprae said:You understand Nintendo and Square Enix are two different companies, right?JCAll said:At least they waited until the thing was out before shutting it down. We all know nothing can ever be removed from the internet once it's out. I'd like to think that was a conscious decision by Nintendo, but I'm probably over thinking it.
And yes, I'm still bitter about the Chrono Trigger Remake Project.
Heck, depending on the franchise's reputation, or how people feel about its fanbase, there's most likely more than one. I seem to recall a fighting game of some sort that was C&D'd and pretty much half the people in the thread that was posted here when news broke defended the action. Pretty much called the people that were upset about it huge crybabies.tags said:THERES ALWAYS ONE GUY WHO DEFENDS THIS SHIT