If you REALLY think you are so right, and everyone else is wrong, why not send Dr. Fauci your discovery since you think we are all just unaware of these amazing discoveries and just refusing to use them to save lives. Tell him how wrong he is about the SARS vaccine not being effective for COVID-19 and he just needs to give everyone vitamin D instead and they will be fine. Now, just understand before you do, it is not my fault if they put you on a watch list or have someone show up to your door wanting to do a competency test for insisting this is the real solution here.
SO we tell you that you are misunderstanding and misrepresenting the data and then you go and misunderstand and misrepresent the data AND what I and other forum members post as well. Tell ya what, go to medical school, get your degree in immunology, virology, epidemiology and come back here and re read your posts and you will FINALLY understand WHY everyone told you this. You misunderstanding what I mean by 30 strains, because we actually do have many more than that now, as this is how we, in the field actually refer to the different strains, the person telling you that there are only a few strains, is saying that even though there are many strains, there are only with enough significance to actually matter. Those researching this however, still refer to these many strains as strains. You not understanding the difference does not mean that it is incorrect, you just do not understand what is being referred to here. That is what happens when you attempt to think you know better than those who actually understand the subject matter being discussed. In addition, SARS and COVID-19 are not the same and do different things, Them BOTH being coronavirus does not make all coronavirus the same. AGAIN you are misunderstanding what I stated and misrepresenting it. CONTEXT is everything and you constantly take things from one context and put them in another and that is why you are wrong on every level here.
ALSO:
Where in any of these studies is it even addressing that Hypoxia induced by the infection in their lungs that prevents the alveoli from properly distributing oxygen to your cells increasing the alkalosis and system pH. The alkalotic pH then suppresses the normal renal release of phosphate then interferes with production of vitamin D? It can be the lack of oxygen that induces the vitamin D deficiency, not that they necessarily had one before becoming ill. It was a result of, not the cause of.
We have even seen this in pediatric patients who hyperventilated in class. Their vitamin D levels returned to normal once we restored normal levels of oxygen.
In addition, patients in the hospital in ICU are already receiving Vitamin D supplements via their IV, along with the other daily nutritional requirements. Those same patients that died, that are being mentioned above, also received vitamin D via their IV as well. We expect them to show deficiency in Vitamin D when you are discussing patients that had reduced levels of oxygen. The reason this isn't some " major break through" and having physicians in ICU across the world jumping for joy here is they are only telling us something we already knew occurs in patients deprived of oxygen and that increasing those patients vitamin D levels does not change what is happening to their alveoli function so that the patient can actually receive more oxygen to their cells. This is why ECMO is needed so that their body can even receive the oxygen it needs to fight off the infection in the first place. Their vitamin D levels return to normal once the ECMO improves their oxygen levels to what is needed to survive. In the case with Vitamin D and hypoxia, is we need Vitamin D to both prevent Hypoxia while at the same time a vitamin D deficiency can result because of the hypoxia. This is why just having a patient showing a vitamin D deficiency AFTER suffering from hypoxia does not mean that the vitamin D deficiency existed PRIOR to the hypoxia, it is also a result of Hypoxia in the first place. When treated, patients normally do not show a vitamin D deficiency at all once their oxygen levels return to normal. Researchers who have not actually worked with patients to understand this may overlook the fact that this is not uncommon and something we actually see that happens frequently in the field. Oh yea.. DUH... guess they forgot about that. This is why peer review is important.