Mayhaps you posted before reading the article?Samtemdo8 said:Is it because he had people telling him what to do and keep him in his place that this movie is good?
Or is this the case where he made a good movie all on his own?
I just remember Zhukov's thread showing the high Metacritic and Rottan Tomatoes score.Xsjadoblayde said:Mayhaps you posted before reading the article?Samtemdo8 said:Is it because he had people telling him what to do and keep him in his place that this movie is good?
Or is this the case where he made a good movie all on his own?
OT: I'll probably see it purely for James McAvoy's colourful performance. The rest is all just dressing.
Tell that to Uwe Boll. Then again, the name he made for himself was "worst director in the world"....so maybe that's why he can't get funded $.02 to make a movie.Smoketrail said:Read the title as Is "M. Night Shyamalan Black?", was very confused.
On an unrelated note: it does seem like once you make a name for yourself you can just keep making films no matter how consistently terrible they are.
Atleast he is not on fire...right?tippy2k2 said:Why you gotta tease me like that Marter?
I was super excited. Then I saw. shamalamadingdongs name which got me super depressed. Then I saw your title and got super excited again. Then I read your review and died a little on the inside...
Shit I was just Playing Mass Effect just now and I still have Joker's voice in my head, I was like "What the hell is Joker doing here?" Than I realize Oh yeah Seth Green.Saelune said:Atleast he is not on fire...right?tippy2k2 said:Why you gotta tease me like that Marter?
I was super excited. Then I saw. shamalamadingdongs name which got me super depressed. Then I saw your title and got super excited again. Then I read your review and died a little on the inside...
Ugh my Snyder fanboy is being tested.008Zulu said:He isn't the only director that needs to throw away his pen and focus solely on directing. cough Snyder. cough
I suspect it's all an elaborate tax dodge.Smoketrail said:On an unrelated note: it does seem like once you make a name for yourself you can just keep making films no matter how consistently terrible they are.
They suck but they make money, especially the last two. And that's what Hollywood cares about.Timedraven 117 said:I have to ask, who keeps giving this guy money? I mean he's only had string of failures for apparently more than a decade.
No. It would be misleading if the title was "M. Night Shyamalan is back."Porygon-2000 said:Q. "Is M. Night Shyamalan back?"
A. No. No he is not.
That was a misleading title for the article, wasn't it?
To be fair, The Happening is a great comedy film that has some fairly decent camera work. Unfortunately it was meant to be a hard R horror movie.Samtemdo8 said:Don't act like Batman v Superman was somehow worse than The Happening.
No it was an utter pile.JemothSkarii said:To be fair, The Happening is a great comedy film that has some fairly decent camera work. Unfortunately it was meant to be a hard R horror movie.Samtemdo8 said:Don't act like Batman v Superman was somehow worse than The Happening.
On Topic: I'm not terribly surprised, the only universal thing I hear about this movie is that James McAvoy does a great job. But maybe it would have been nice for him to have a comeback, I mean, the man seems pretty passionate.