I couldn't read this entire article since it stinks of self-entitlement. Would someone please give me the tl;dr version?
But Nintendo is much better at milking franchises you have to admit.BrunDeign said:Does the lady realize that literally EVERY franchise she mentioned that is "new" has at least two games in its franchise already? And except for Uncharted and Gears, everything else is getting one-a-year, two-a-year releases and being milked constantly.
No. It doesn't have to do with a narrow games industry but rather just poor communication between both sides. Developers would love to make a game on the wii (look at it this way. The biggest console base in the world is, the Wii). They ask for easier tools to work with, ability to port, an interactive online component for updating material and DLC. Nintendo doesn't feel like it needs to offer any support because it is already has the biggest pie of the console market so the developer should feel privaleged they get to be a part of it. Whereas developers feel the other way around and instead that attitude deters them from producing games on that system.I forgot said:This article was irritating to read. The writer is being fickle. The complaints don't even have to do with Nintendo at times. Lack of 3rd party support for the wii is only evidence of a crappy narrow games industry, not the fault of Nintendo. I thought we were done with this kind of shit 2 years ago.
Portable consoles that rely on WiFi for online play are one of the most pertinent examples. No wonder smartphones have gained so much ground over the past years. As someone with a life that does not make many allowances for gaming bouts, I've noticed first-hand just how convenient and fun being able to play online with my pals on the bus, while waiting, or between meetings can be.Briana Lawrence said:The gaming world passes Nintendo by, offering things that the company hasn't touched - DLC, online gaming
Developing for the wii is easier than the ps3 and the complaints about online updating and DLC almost nobody gets are weak and is a habit the industry needs to get out of. You can make good games and good selling games without any of those.Onionman said:No. It doesn't have to do with a narrow games industry but rather just poor communication between both sides. Developers would love to make a game on the wii (look at it this way. The biggest console base in the world is, the Wii). They ask for easier tools to work with, ability to port, an interactive online component for updating material and DLC. Nintendo doesn't feel like it needs to offer any support because it is already has the biggest pie of the console market so the developer should feel privaleged they get to be a part of it. Whereas developers feel the other way around and instead that attitude deters them from producing games on that system.I forgot said:This article was irritating to read. The writer is being fickle. The complaints don't even have to do with Nintendo at times. Lack of 3rd party support for the wii is only evidence of a crappy narrow games industry, not the fault of Nintendo. I thought we were done with this kind of shit 2 years ago.
But the reality is, it is all about money. If I made a game for xbox 360, I have the tools to easily port it to PC and PS3. I also get support selling my game for the xbox / PS marketplaces and I can get support for my game from Steam for PC (steam is a very cheap reliable way to distribute your games). If I made a game for Nintendo, I can't do that
Novelty? On 360? Enlighten me please.Mamzelle_Kat said:Man, I read this article and I couldn't stop thinking "that's exactly what's going on with me." I own a Wii. I've owned it since week 2. What Wii games do I have? Trauma Center, Twilight Princess, Super Smash Brawl. I think that's it. One of my friends offered to buy it from me since I haven't played it in years. I really want to, but then something inside me yells NO!!! What if something incredible comes out next month?? Also, you won't be able to play those Gamecube games you love so much!!
Truth is, there are some good titles on the Wii. I've meant to buy Metroid Prime 3 since i loved the first two, Donkey Kong Country Returns had some great reviews, and both Super Mario Galaxy's are some of the most creative platformers that came out in recent years. Problem is, for every one of these releases, something awesome came out on the Xbox 360. Something new.
Given the choice between two equally good games, one that is a great reiteration of a franchise and one that is an awesome piece of something never before seen... I'm going to pick novelty.
Needless to say that wasn't the Wii title.
rembrandtqeinstein said:When I see things likethe only thing I have to say is "get over yourself". Who are these mythical people sorting you into the "girl gamer" category and why do you give two squirts about their opinion?As if the goofy games weren't shameful enough, now I had to be lumped into the casual "girl gamer" category because of Nintendo's sudden campaign to skip Mario and Zelda in favor of some balance boards and yoga mats.
AMEN! Why is this writer letting sexist douchebags define her existence? I read to the end and noted that her name is "Briana" so she IS a girl gamer. Instead of getting all offended about being called WHAT SHE IS - why not just redefine the title and tell those people to stuff it?
This whole article riled on me. So Nintendo is making games that sell and bringing in a wider market. Instead of blasting Nintendo and the people who play "casual" games - why not be happy that stuff like this makes games more mainstream and acceptable. If games hadn't become more mainstream and sold well - does she even think that those big ticket complicated "hardcore" games she brags about would even exist in the first place? No, games would be an obscure corner market and there would be no budget for any of them.
Also, she complains the whole article about Nintendo making the same game over and over again - and yet she buys them all. Why would Nintendo stop making stuff that people buy?