if i hardly play a game its because its bad. some of the games i havent finished either because its either boring or just bad.
I have it, never played it. The biggest issue is that it's a really big game and my free time is rather limited right now. Someday, when I get a big chunk of free time to play with. In the meantime, I've been working through the pile of shorter games on my list.snekadid said:The only real news here was that people are buying skyrim and never even playing it. ITS A GOOD GAME PEOPLE!
Ditto on that. Most of my games came from humble bundle and I probably haven't played 50% of them. Probably because a lot of them I wanted a decent controller for and just got a ps3 plus i had a crappy laptop that couldnt really handle the decent ones. Now that I have both a gaming pc and ps3 that number might drop to around the average 30%.....eventuallysoftclocks said:Looking at my steam library, around 100 of the 280 games have never been installed.
The main offenders probably being the humble-bundle games. When you buy a 1 dollar bundle because you want 1 game, there's going to be 5 games just gathering dust in the library.
Still, a very interesting (possibly disturbing) trend.
Also, on my profile all of the Borderlands DLC are listed as games, which becomes another 6 "games" where only one is played.
They're not your enemy either.AntiChri5 said:Remember kids, Steam Sales are not your friend.
I agree with there might be areas that the automated process of this could be considered getting false information. I also wonder how many of those could be DLC or expansions.softclocks said:Looking at my steam library, around 100 of the 280 games have never been installed.
The main offenders probably being the humble-bundle games. When you buy a 1 dollar bundle because you want 1 game, there's going to be 5 games just gathering dust in the library.
Still, a very interesting (possibly disturbing) trend.
Also, on my profile all of the Borderlands DLC are listed as games, which becomes another 6 "games" where only one is played.
It's interesting how all of the top 5 most played there are multiplayer games, including Counter-Strike and Left 4 Dead 2. Also the top 10 are well-known and acclaimed games that can run on computers that are either powerful for being few years old or just not very powerful.Steven Bogos said:Some of the other information it gathered tells us stuff that we already should know - DoTA 2 and Team Fortress 2 are the most-played games on Steam by a considerable margin, and that Call of Duty players spend a lot more time in the game's multiplayer mode than its singleplayer mode.
Source: Ars Technica [http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/2/]
Permalink
Exactly. And Ars Technica even admits in the article some of their statistics are likely skewed because of factors like the ones you mentioned.BraveSirRobin said:Honestly I find this a bit misleading at least for my personal statistics. I've had a steam account for over 9 years dating back to early 2005. Given that steam didn't start tracking gametime until mid-2009, that is roughly 4.5 years of gameplay just completely unaccounted for. With several hundred games on my account ~20% of those don't actually have gametime accounted on them because I played them before steam even had time tracking. Games like counter-srtike that should have 100's of hours sit at 0 because I've moved on to other games and haven't gone back since. Plus there are the games like Doom and Quake that I play for an hour or two here and there that don't record gametime at all. That said I have quite a few games I have yet to play, but that number probably comes in much closer to 10% of my library.
I realize that I've had an account waaaaay longer than the average user but I still think that it's worth mentioning that that feature wasn't even introduced until over halfway through Steam's current lifecycle.
Honestly that's one of the things in the article I have no trouble believing. Unlike most games designed to be played once or twice. Each of those six have the benefit of immense replayability and extensive brand presence regardless of personal opinion. Each of those also has the backing of an incredibly old and popular franchise. When you couple that with the fact that Dota 2 and TF2 are literally free, and that probably ~10% of people DON'T own one of the counter strikes by now, and that they routinely just have more players than other games most of the time, it's pretty easy to see that gametime builds up quickly.Vigormortis said:Though, the biggest surprise was the breakdown of total hours played across all titles. The combined total playtime of Dota 2, Team Fortress 2, Counter-Strike: Source, Counter-Strike, Civilization V, and Skyrim is almost equal to the combined playtime of all other titles.
That just....blows my mind.
That's very admirable.Sanunes said:I agree with there might be areas that the automated process of this could be considered getting false information. I also wonder how many of those could be DLC or expansions.
For me my non-played category for Steam is very low if you don't count the games that were part of bundles, I think out of almost two hundred games I have less then ten I have never played and most of those are recent purchases that I have to make sure there is data left on my monthly bandwidth allotment.