Nobody is getting anything wrong, they're just differences. Why can't people understand that differences between English dialects (or any language) aren't good or bad?Versuvius said:The chips vs fries and chips vs crisps thing irritates me to no end. Damn Americans can't even get that right.
Heh, no one can get it right. America has so many different areas that these things happen everywhere. Where I live, soda is just soda. My grandmother across the USA calls it pop, along with everyone in her area.Colour-Scientist said:Yeah I get it to a certain extent but sometimes I get mixed up.Vidi Kitty said:Jelly is basically coagulated fruit juice spread. Jam is that but with bits of fruit in it, also called preserves, while Jello is pseudo fruit juice and sugar that has become a jiggling bowl of nothing but taste.Colour-Scientist said:Also the jam/jelly/jello (or crisps/chips/fries) thing is slightly confusing.
As for the crisps, not too sure myself. Chips are anything cut into thin slices such as pickle chips and fries are the same as British chips.
America: U.K./Ireland:
Jelly/Jam = Jam
Jello = Jelly
Chips = Crisps
Fries = Chips
Or something...
I refer you back to an earlier quote of the Queen. "Dear Mr. Jobs: There's no such thing as 'american english', just english.... and mistakes"megamanenm said:Nobody is getting anything wrong, they're just differences. Why can't people understand that differences between English dialects (or any language) aren't good or bad?Versuvius said:The chips vs fries and chips vs crisps thing irritates me to no end. Damn Americans can't even get that right.
I refer you back to the post I made before this. Language evolves, it doesn't devolve, that's would make no sense, is the English of the 13th century wrong? Which "version" of English is best? No version is the best, and here we can back to the word "different".Versuvius said:I refer you back to an earlier quote of the Queen. "Dear Mr. Jobs: There's no such thing as 'american english', just english.... and mistakes"megamanenm said:Nobody is getting anything wrong, they're just differences. Why can't people understand that differences between English dialects (or any language) aren't good or bad?Versuvius said:The chips vs fries and chips vs crisps thing irritates me to no end. Damn Americans can't even get that right.
I only ever refer to them as fizzy drinks and even then I just normally use the specific brand name.Vidi Kitty said:Heh, no one can get it right. America has so many different areas that these things happen everywhere. Where I live, soda is just soda. My grandmother across the USA calls it pop, along with everyone in her area.
The lat/ping issue isn't an American thing, its a technology thing. Some people don't know or just don't get that electricity, signals, etc., take time to get from them to the server and back to them.rapidoud said:My 2:
That Americans call things by state and not Country. 'Where are you from?' 'Oklahoma' 'Oh is that in Africa?' '...' What do you expect? Everyone else says country, why can't you? You can instantly tell a website is American if you see this, especially places like wikipedia where it'll list countries and then American states -_-.
The second is that Americans don't even understand what lag or ping are and it frustrates me to have to tell them that when you live in another country that the host is at fault for your poor latency when you use 20Mb/s or above and they use 512Kb/s... but hey, it's my fault because my bar is red durrrr
Anyway, parts of the list seem like major overreactions.
Because America is bastardising the language in illogical ways. Should it not be up to ENGLAND (And possibly the british isles if they want to join in) to evolve the language? Not colonists who didn't like our taxes and dumped tea in the ocean? I mean the Boston Tea Party by law means that the US has no right to actually evolve a language they just borrowed because lets face it, it is the best.megamanenm said:I refer you back to the post I made before this. Language evolves, it doesn't devolve, that's would make no sense, is the English of the 13th century wrong? Which "version" of English is best? No version is the best, and here we can back to the word "different".Versuvius said:I refer you back to an earlier quote of the Queen. "Dear Mr. Jobs: There's no such thing as 'american english', just english.... and mistakes"megamanenm said:Nobody is getting anything wrong, they're just differences. Why can't people understand that differences between English dialects (or any language) aren't good or bad?Versuvius said:The chips vs fries and chips vs crisps thing irritates me to no end. Damn Americans can't even get that right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_functionMr Pantomime said:I was laughing at first, but reading 50 english people ***** about stupid things really puts me on edge
*watches new skyward sword trailer*
All better
I do have a distain for buzzwords. Such as "ahead of the curve". What. Fucking. Curve?
... wow. I really hope you're trolling here. Do you think that people sit around a table and decide how language evolves or something? Of course not, it just happens. When a group of people split off, they evolve their languages in different ways, this is how dialects arise. It happens to Dutch (Afrikaans) and it happened to Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese for example). And grammaticality isn't based on "logic" in any language, if you want logic then use math, if you want to communicate then use language.Versuvius said:Because America is bastardising the language in illogical ways. Should it not be up to ENGLAND (And possibly the british isles if they want to join in) to evolve the language? Not colonists who didn't like our taxes and dumped tea in the ocean? I mean the Boston Tea Party by law means that the US has no right to actually evolve a language they just borrowed because lets face it, it is the best.megamanenm said:I refer you back to the post I made before this. Language evolves, it doesn't devolve, that's would make no sense, is the English of the 13th century wrong? Which "version" of English is best? No version is the best, and here we can back to the word "different".Versuvius said:I refer you back to an earlier quote of the Queen. "Dear Mr. Jobs: There's no such thing as 'american english', just english.... and mistakes"megamanenm said:Nobody is getting anything wrong, they're just differences. Why can't people understand that differences between English dialects (or any language) aren't good or bad?Versuvius said:The chips vs fries and chips vs crisps thing irritates me to no end. Damn Americans can't even get that right.
To be fair, I'm from the US and I've never heard the word "Deplane" until now.this isnt my name said:4. Using 24/7 rather than "24 hours, 7 days a week" or even just plain "all day, every day". Simon Ball, Worcester
Oh fuck off, im a brit, 24/7 is fin, much quicker than 24 hours, 7 days a week.
Christ what happened to the British stiff upper lip. Its a fucking word. Allthough the way some things are pronounced annnoy me, and deplane is jsut fucking stupid. But 24/7 is nothing.