When I saw the review up I was hoping it'd be you. Your style of review lends itself well to Lego (Insert Franchise Here). By the way, when the hell am I getting my Lego Ghostbusters? It would fit so well. Act 1, the movies, act 2 the cartoon, act 3 extreme. Walter Peck comes with the special power of shutting off power.Susan Arendt said:
I'm actually all about Hedwig.Viruzzo said:
The Leaky Cauldron acts as your hub. From there, you can head back to Hogwarts to continue the story, replay levels in Freeplay, visit Diagon alley, or watch the cinematics you've unlocked. You start there when you first fire up the game, and can return there at any time.squid5580 said:
Indiana Jones was just plain bad, and I didn't personally care for Batman. This, however, I adore. Granted, a lot of that is simply because I love the source material so much, but I also just plain think it's a better designed game.standokan said:
That's why we got it on Monday. No work for us so we started it. This game is surprisingly long for a Lego game. Most do have you trudging through levels (standard children's game stuff with a lot of time used by destroying everything in an area) and of course, once beaten, replaying them to gather all of the collectibles. But, after 10 hours of play which has been enough for us to get through Lego Star Wars the Complete Saga, we are only at the halfway mark of Year 4.DAVEoftheDEAD said:
Good review, sounds like I'd imagine a Lego Harry Potter game would. My question, though, is how the game's story handles cycling through four full years at Hogwarts. That's a TON of things to happen in one game.. is the game really long, with each year feeling like a definitive section of the experience? Or does the game use those events as a backdrop, and instead has Harry and friends more wandering around than anything?Susan Arendt said:
