THQ: Homefront Is Not a 71

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
THQ: Homefront Is Not a 71


THQ Vice President Danny Bilson says you can't apply math to art but when it comes to Homefront [http://www.amazon.com/Homefront-Xbox-360/dp/B003Q53VZC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1302635491&sr=8-1], it's "clearly" better than a 71.

70. That's what THQ's near-future invasion drama Homefront has managed to ring up on Metacritic [http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/homefront/results] and while that's a fairly decent score by most real-world measures, when it comes to videogames it's, well, not. It's not an unmitigated disaster by any stretch but it's definitely not a critical success either, and worse, that distinctly sub-80 number is bound to put it beneath the notice of a lot of score-obsessed gamers.

But Bilson, who's been the driving force behind the game since he joined THQ in 2008, is pretty happy. "A million units in a week on an original IP coming out of nowhere I think speaks a lot to the concept and the marketing of the game," he told IGN [http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/116/1161057p1.html]. "I think we really captured people's imagination with the IP. I'm very proud [of] what the teams have done with that game."

The goal, he continued, was not to beat modern shooter behemoths like Call of Duty [http://www.amazon.com/Call-Duty-Black-Ops-Xbox-360/dp/B003JVKHEQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1302635593&sr=8-1] but just to get THQ "in the conversation" and in that regard, he described it as mission accomplished. "Everybody's talking about Homefront," he said.

"Do I prefer that it's controversial? No, I'd prefer if everybody in the world loved it," he continued. "But there are 20-plus reviews that are over 80, there are some haters, and there are some mid-range ones. Do I read them all to see what we can do better next time and have every review be 100? Of course, our goal is always that. What I will say pretty clearly is the game is not a 71. You can't apply math to art."

I wholeheartedly agree with that last statement, and I think that the fixation with applying scores to everything that moves has ultimately done more harm than good to the usefulness of videogame reviews over the years. So how about a more meaningful measure of success, then: will Homefront get a sequel?

"All I'm allowed to say is we have a lot of plans for the future of Homefront that we'll be rolling out over the next few months," Bilson said. "I have a lot of plans; they're pretty interesting and unique. We intend to grow the online multiplayer over the year with a robust downloadable content plan which we haven't announced yet. To be honest with you, I see Battlefield 3 [http://www.amazon.com/Battlefield-3-Limited-Xbox-360/dp/B003O6G5TW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1302635748&sr=8-1] on the horizon and the bar is going up. So we need to do some careful thinking on the production side because the competition looks amazing."

THQ announced that Homefront had broken the one million unit sales mark near the end of March. DLC updates are presumably in the works but no specifics have yet been mentioned.


Permalink
 

Nikolaz72

This place still alive?
Apr 23, 2009
2,125
0
0
I believe they are right. . THQ is damn well good enough when they can compete with uhm. . . Medal of Honor! The new one that is. I mean they are usual not in the market so I would say they did pretty well. And his right, haters gonna hate.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
Yes it is, THQ.

71 isn't bad.

WHY ARE REVIEWS NOW BASICALLY ON A SCALE OF 7-10?

Anything below a 7 is somehow shit-on-a-stick.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Fucking hell, I've only read the first sentence and I'm cringing already.

Onyx Oblivion said:
Yes it is, THQ.

71 isn't bad.

WHY ARE REVIEWS NOW BASICALLY ON A SCALE OF 7-10?

Anything below a 7 is somehow shit-on-a-stick.
Hilariously, as this fad has now taken over, we must actually view 7s as 'very meh', because reviewers award them as such.

Its a vicious circle of numerical nonsensicalness.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
I would give Homefront an 80, not great *cough*singleplayer*caugh*, but its still fun MP wise.

Assassin Xaero said:
It wasn't until you nurfed the online play. Way to go in dumbing it down.
What did they do, exactly?
 

manythings

New member
Nov 7, 2009
3,297
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
Yes it is, THQ.

71 isn't bad.

WHY ARE REVIEWS NOW BASICALLY ON A SCALE OF 7-10?

Anything below a 7 is somehow shit-on-a-stick.
Well since 5 would be average, 6 would be ok, 7 is good, 8 is really good, 9 is great and 10 is amazing.

Also I view numbers as a retarded system since they don't really weigh the factors. I prefer the old Siskel and Ebert thing and even then I don't really accept opinions from some guy at a magazine when I actually know some people who play games.
 

Holy_Handgrenade

New member
Feb 16, 2009
288
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
Yes it is, THQ.

71 isn't bad.

WHY ARE REVIEWS NOW BASICALLY ON A SCALE OF 7-10?

Anything below a 7 is somehow shit-on-a-stick.
I know that bugs me alot if I a game is 5 out of 10 it is the equivalent to a 2 on a actual scale when it should be avarage.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
manythings said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
Yes it is, THQ.

71 isn't bad.

WHY ARE REVIEWS NOW BASICALLY ON A SCALE OF 7-10?

Anything below a 7 is somehow shit-on-a-stick.
Well since 5 would be average, 6 would be ok, 7 is good, 8 is really good, 9 is great and 10 is amazing.
I'm actually nostalgic for the old Gamespot review system, from YEARS back...That actually kinda made sense. 6s weren't immediately dismissed as trash...
 

manythings

New member
Nov 7, 2009
3,297
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
manythings said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
Yes it is, THQ.

71 isn't bad.

WHY ARE REVIEWS NOW BASICALLY ON A SCALE OF 7-10?

Anything below a 7 is somehow shit-on-a-stick.
Well since 5 would be average, 6 would be ok, 7 is good, 8 is really good, 9 is great and 10 is amazing.
I'm actually nostalgic for the old Gamespot review system, from YEARS back...That actually kinda made sense. 6s weren't immediately dismissed as trash...
I ignore reviews anyway (unless they are seriously bad) since the opinion of someone I know trumps a guy who is paid to try a game and make up his own mind based on what he cares about in a game. For all I know he wants exactly the opposite of what I want.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
-Drifter- said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
Yes it is, THQ.
You know, for someone who's tagline is "Your opinion is not fact"...

Well, I think you get my point.
This is not my opinion...That is fact. Homefront is a 71.

Anyway, that tagline is mainly pointed at the forums, where everyone seems to think that they can just say "x is bad, because x sucks"...without reasons that are anything more than pure opinion.
 

Hungry Donner

Henchman
Mar 19, 2009
1,369
0
0
I don't give places like metacritic much consideration but from the reviews I've read Homefront is hardly stellar material.
 

maantren

New member
Jan 16, 2008
88
0
0
Well, 'Hamlet' is about a 76, while Raphael's 'The Betrothal of the Virgin' is high 60s at best. I think THQ should be proud of Homefront's number, especially as a first-time release, though I worry what'll happen to their sales figures when more silver age latin poetry gets on the shelves, that stuff hits 95 on MetaRomaCritic regularly...

Cheers

Colin
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Its funny, because if the game got a 90, you know they would plaster it in every advertisement they could.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Yup. He's right. It most definitely isn't a 71.

It was a miserable fucking 40.

A shameless CoD-clone without one jot of interest or originality. Just one more drip of grey water in the great river of dreary mediocrity. Not worthy of note even by the abysmally low standards of video games.

Bleh, I say. Bleh