- Feb 7, 2011
- 7,921
- 2,283
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
No, once again that's not how that works.I think that would be for a finder of fact (typically juror but can be the judge) to determine (when has a line been crossed and a person moved to commit a crime they would not otherwise commit. And it is subjective. What if the person in question is highly suggestible?
Someone being highly suggestible has absolutely no bearing on whether entrapment has occurred. The standard is whether a reasonable person would act in the same way. Not this specific individual, a reasonable person.
Entrapment is is used as a defense very narrowly and would not apply in any way to any of the made up scenarios you have presented as in none of your scenarios were the capitol rioters ever compelled to carry out any of their crimes.