Zachary Amaranth said:
MorgulMan said:
As to false to facts, I mean to say that, barring a rare genetic disorder (which generally manifests nonetheless in a fairly definitive physical sex AFAIK) he has a definite sex. There is no gender problem, unless he is a word with an ambiguous ending.
Sex and physical gender are not the same thing.
You can and many, I'm sure, do make that assertion, but saying it doesn't make it so. Which is kind of my point here. I can't be certain what you mean by "physical gender" that I would not call "sex". To the best of my knowledge, the word gender has been applied to non-grammatical uses for barely a half century, and in vogue for perhaps half of that. Again, in my understanding, it has been used to refer to societal or psychological markers/roles that are associated with sex.
To say there is no gender prblem is to triialise your hypothetical child's experience. attempting to "fix" them will likely result in depression and suicide attempts.
I cannot, for the life of me, imagine what loving or caring parent would want their kids to be treated to depression and suicide just to "fix" their own issues with the matter at hand.
It is precisely because I love my children that I would affirm reality and try to help them reconcile their internal conflict with that reality. Agreeing with my daughter that she is really a male when she is objectively not would not be an act of love. Encouraging her to undergo, if she should decide, a complex "transition" of great medical, legal, social, and psychological import, and to thereby coerce reality to kneel to her delusion, rather than overcoming the delusion to fit reality, would not be an act of love, but practically one of malice.
A self-perception that one is or should be a different sex than one really is IS a delusion, just as much as a perception that one is a cat or Napoleon. While there may be some merit in playing along with the delusion to get at its root, it does no service to the person to encourage and support it. The fact that the root of the problem might not be psychological, but organic, does not mean that the perceived reality is now real.
To put it a different way, when my eight year old daughter tells me she wants to be an astronaut and a writer and a teacher when she grows up, I tell her that those are all very involved careers, and it isn't likely that she's going to achieve them all, but that with hard work and dedication, she could prove me wrong. When my four year old son tells me he wants to be Thomas the Tank engine when he grows up, I tell him he can't, because he is a human, not a train. But if he likes trains, perhaps he can become a conductor, or an engineer, or work to design and build new trains, or any number of things.
It is part of my role, my duty as a parent to teach my children the way things are, and how to handle, cope, or overcome various situations. Affirming something that is patently untrue as truth would be a failure of that duty.