My problem with that philosophy is this:TheRealCJ said:But my question is thus: You may not believe it's truly happening, but why are you so against preventative measures to stop it happening in the future? Surely you'd agree that to stop it from happening 100 years from now, which is entirely plausible, there should be some preventative measures taken now.
Let's say you believe that in 20 years, aliens (the evil kind, not the E.T. kind), are going to come invade Earth. You believe this with all your heart. There's no proof, just a series of shoddy research results and unreliable conclusions that it will happen. You spread your beliefs to every corner of creation, getting more people to believe you than you ever thought. They wail "Help us, what can we do to stop this?!?" You have no idea really, just a bunch more theories that happen to dovetail with what's already out there. With the best of intentions, you release what you believe to be the best preventative measures you can think of. You also think "Well, I spend so much time working on this, I need to make money off it to survive." That becomes another philosophy, a way of life. Soon, making money off the crisis becomes just as important as the crisis itself. You don't think it makes you evil, you have the best of intentions. But you know what they say the road to Hell is paved with.
Also, when anyone refutes your ideas, or even comes out with evidence that shoots your theories down, you denigrate them. Not look at the evidence and think "Hmmm, could I have been wrong? Maybe I should recheck my findings." No, you can't do that, for 2 reasons:
1) Your reputation relies on everyone believing you, and
2) Your income relies on your belief.
Given those motivations, you, and anyone else who has hitched their wagon to you, must move Heaven and Earth to not only shout down your critics, but you must condemn them as 'cranks, nuts, and whackos', because you can't risk ANYONE actually listening to them. You are way too invested in this movement not only survivng, but florishing. Because it's what makes you important. Because YOU CARE.
This, in a nutshell, is the Global Warming movement.
Even when the scientists that initially put forth the theories that Global Warming exists were not only proven wrong, but nearly shunned from the scientific community for being caught making up conclusions that happened to fit with their belief systems, still they were lionized. And why? Because they had the 'best of intentions.' Never mind that these same people invested heavily in companies that promoted 'green tech', never mind that when proof that within the last 10 years the global mean temperature has actually REDUCED itself by a degree, those that put forth the agenda at first must stay the course. As in, the media at large. Why? Because their reps are on the line. If they are proven to have thrown in with cranks and be gullible enough to believe their tripe, they would never be trusted again. So they simply must push the agenda to survive.
Same with the Al Gores of the world. Both their reps AND their income (from speaking engagements, investments, etc.) are at stake by pushing Global Warming. Did you know that in the 1970's the idea at the time was that there was Global Cooling, and that we were headed for another Ice Age? It's true, look it up.
The bottom line is, follow the money. That's all this whole Green Movement, Global Warming crap is, a way to make money off the gullible. That's not meant as an insult, but it's how the believers are often looked at by the powers that be. As far as pollution goes, I'm always for reducing it in all forms, as long as it actually helps and doesn't just create meaningless jobs doing a meaningless job, like recycling (for the most part). Don't get me started on that.