A Town Called Mercy

silver wolf009

[[NULL]]
Jan 23, 2010
3,432
0
0
Proverbial Jon said:
silver wolf009 said:
Maybe I'm looking too deep into it.
You are. But I would be lying if I said I wasn't completely in awe of your dedication to the continuity!
Huzzah continuity!

I'm such a nerd.

Captcha: nice job

So what you're saying Captcha, is that I should revel in my nerdiness? This gives me new meaning! A life with the approval of Captcha!

Also, that line sounds like something Rose would say, but I can't place it either.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
You lost me here: "regardless of how much sense it actually made for the mythology and characters."

Is this REALLY news?
Mottif (whatever) doesn't seem to give a damn about silly things like 'continuity' and 'sense'.

OT:
My dad didn't like it either, but maybe it's a 'generational thing'?

As someone who watched older who on PBS, and then managed to watch/listen to ALL of Doctor Who Classic in the Spring of 2012, I don't think I'm 'missing something'.

I love seeing J.C. in this episode, and thought it fit PERFECT as a 'Doctor Who Western'.
It was cheesy, clean, and made it so The Doctor wasn't some murdering douche bag...like in the previous episode.
 

Flight

New member
Mar 13, 2010
687
0
0
I liked it in general, but that part where Jex pointed out Amy's motherhood and called her kind, I couldn't help but roll my eyes. This is the woman who said "One little girl crying. So?" when the Doctor pointed out an upset child on the Starship UK, and sneeringly implied the Flesh Doctor should just go die because he was "a copy" and therefore not as good as the original. She also completely failed to communicate in her marriage, choosing instead to dump her husband and act like she was doing him a favor, and claimed that the 2,000 years he spent protecting her was "nothing" compared to that. Amy can be a decent person, yes, but "kind" is not the first thing I think of when I look at her. (For the record, "strong-willed" is.)

I did like the Doctor's dark side emerging, and I really wish the writers had done more with that. Perhaps we'll get to delve more into it in the future.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
Vault Citizen said:
albino boo said:
Vault Citizen said:
I thought that this was a great performance by adrian scarborough as the alien doctor. He is most known as a comedy actor (most famously for Gavin and Stacey) and I think he took on the me dramatic role really well.

Adrian Scarborough has far longer history of dramatic roles than comedy.
I did not know that.

He was in the cast of the History Boys with James Corden and later Matt Smith. He was also in Psychoville written by part of the League of Gentleman which of course contained Mark Gatiss. I think you can play 7 degrees of Doctor Who.


Susan Arendt said:
Did it? The Doctor has dealt judgement to his fair share of enemies and people over the years


The Doctor uses force when necessary, certainly, but the whole visual image of him in an Old West-style shootout really just plain isn't him at all. He doesn't delight in going on the offense, he doesn't make it theater.
Well there was a big brouhaha about Colin Baker actually shooting a cyberman during his run. His version of the Doctor was quite angry so its not entirely outside the of the character. However its not something that most of the doctors would have done, I myself prefer Tom Bakers offering of Jelly Babies as sign of contempt for weapons.



 

Mr F.

New member
Jul 11, 2012
614
0
0
I fucking loved this episode.

I wish Nathan Fillion was in it though. I mean, SPACE. COWBOY.

SERIOUSLY.

Best moment, by far, was the horse called Susan. I mean, trans-gendered (Or transexual) horse in a Dr Who? Light hearted joke that might make people even an iota more accepting towards trans folk?

A thousand levels of win.

Humour is the best way of breaking down barriers between communities.

All of that aside, it was not better then dinosaurs on a spaceship (Avec Lestrade) yet very few things CAN beat dinosaurs on a spaceship.
 

Lancer873

New member
Oct 10, 2009
520
0
0
I felt the pacing was rather off, most of the mysteries were solved within minutes, but in general I liked it. Some of the points depend on how they handle the future episodes. Like how the Doctor actually threatened Jex with a gun. This could be signifying a humongous change in the Doctor, but if they just leave it at that then it was just so much instant drama.
 
Apr 17, 2009
1,751
0
0
I respectfully disagree. I thought the episode was rollicking good fun and that the presentation of grey morality in Kahler-Jax and the Gunslinger was pretty well done, neither being moustache-twirlingly evil or sickeningly pure. I also thought Jax was a good comparison to the Doctor himself, which is why I thought forcing Jax outside the boundary actually worked; its not just the Doctor bringing down a bit of karma (like in last week), its him rejecting all the actions he took in the Time War, all the things he had to do to save millions.

PhunkyPhazon said:
As a relatively new fan who has been enjoying every minute of this ride, I have a hard time really examining Doctor Who from a critical standpoint, mainly I'm just having too much fun to give a damn. But I will say this: the line "Everyone who isn't an American, drop your gun!" really made me cringe. Is that really what we sound like to the British?
Well, a little. But in this case the line was less about "Hurr hurr we 'mericans we love guns" and more "yeah, we actually know how to use these guns, so could you guys please just put them down" since Amy was just firing randomly in all directions and all
 

saintdane05

New member
Aug 2, 2011
1,849
0
0
albino boo said:
Personally I thought the episode wasn't that bad, but not that great either. It felt like a number episodes of American Sci-Fi shows had been cut up and thrown against a wall and what ever stuck was the story. What lifted it was the interplay between Scarborough and Smith but not enough to make it a good story. C- a gallant attempt, is my verdict

ps
[B/] BRING BACK TOM BAKER[/B]
Good look doing that. He's practically retired, and only goes to conventions or does the occasional audio drama.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
saintdane05 said:
albino boo said:
Personally I thought the episode wasn't that bad, but not that great either. It felt like a number episodes of American Sci-Fi shows had been cut up and thrown against a wall and what ever stuck was the story. What lifted it was the interplay between Scarborough and Smith but not enough to make it a good story. C- a gallant attempt, is my verdict

ps
[B/] BRING BACK TOM BAKER[/B]
Good look doing that. He's practically retired, and only goes to conventions or does the occasional audio drama.
I know all that but he was the last genuine eccentric to play the role. I doubt any the others doctors could pull this off.

 

saintdane05

New member
Aug 2, 2011
1,849
0
0
albino boo said:
saintdane05 said:
albino boo said:
Personally I thought the episode wasn't that bad, but not that great either. It felt like a number episodes of American Sci-Fi shows had been cut up and thrown against a wall and what ever stuck was the story. What lifted it was the interplay between Scarborough and Smith but not enough to make it a good story. C- a gallant attempt, is my verdict

ps
[B/] BRING BACK TOM BAKER[/B]
Good look doing that. He's practically retired, and only goes to conventions or does the occasional audio drama.
I know all that but he was the last genuine eccentric to play the role. I doubt any the others doctors could pull this off.

If you know Matt Smith, you will realize that he tones himself down to be less eccentric.

And besides, Tom Baker doesn't look as hot without a shirt.
 

coolerthanice21

New member
Feb 23, 2010
35
0
0
People keep saying that The Doctor killing Solomon in Dinosaurs was out of character, like he has never killed before. It reminded me of Tennant's "No second chances" line from The Christmas Invasion, spoken right after he killed someone.
 

Wolf In A Bear Suit

New member
Jun 2, 2012
519
0
0
I didn't really fall for this episode to be honest but I see why you guys did. I care more about the mystery behind the alien and its undefeatable power's (that ultimately get defeated) rather than a moral conundrum. I like very gradual development with the Doctor character but I feel like there is no area of his morality that hasn't been addressed at this stage, and someone please send Rory and Amy packing, we know their quirks and there flaws, and I'm just sick to death of hearing about them.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
albino boo said:
ps
[B/] BRING BACK TOM BAKER[/B]
As of the 25th Anniversary, Tom Baker pretty much said "screw this show, it ruined my career, I'll have nothing more to do with it" - which is why he isn't in the Five Doctors in any way but old stock footage from an unaired, incomplete episode. I doubt he--

TimeLord said:
Tom Baker is about 150 now however he has been confirmed to be back for the 50th anniversary thing next year!
....

Ahem, I stand corrected. I guess his career is looking a lot less rosy these days, and a paycheck is a paycheck.

Personally, I'm hoping for another appearance by Peter Davidson, my personal favorite Doctor. His brief crossover with Tennant was one of the most wonderful moments in all of Doctor Who for me - not the least of which is because Tennant totally broke the 4th wall to gush about how much he loved Peter Davidson.

Anyway, OT: ... John Motherfucking Crichton. Seeing Ben Browder and Matt Smith playing across from one another was so damn surreal - I loved it. The episode was far less interesting once his character died.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
8-Bit_Jack said:
Wow, Susan. You are so impressively wrong.
This episode wasn't as good as last week, but it was still better than essentially all of Smith's first first season.
**blinks**

Better than the Eleventh Hour? The Beast Below? The Vampires of Venice? The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood? Vincent and the Doctor? The Pandorica Opens/The Big Bang?

I would rate Matt Smith's first season (ie season 5) as one of the best overall seasons of the new series. Some of the previous seasons have had one super good episode or two (ie Family of Blood), but they are rarely as consistently good.

And I don't think Town Called Mercy holds up against any of the episodes listed above.
 

TheBestPieEver

New member
Dec 13, 2011
128
0
0
Whilst this may have been a pretty terrible episode, the fact that they are trying to steer The Doctor into a more morally ambiguous direction with Smith's version of him makes me wonder if there are any plans for bringing The Valeyard back. After getting blood on his hands on the Asylum and no longer being able to scare off the Daleks by just saying "Do you know who I am?", I think that The Doctor will get a little darker during this incarnation. Then on the 12th we'll see all of that take it's form by he becoming The Valeyard. Not making a series about him, mind you, but making him a new foe by making him the evil side of The Doctor manifested or something of that sort.
 

userwhoquitthesite

New member
Jul 23, 2009
2,177
0
0
Bara_no_Hime said:
8-Bit_Jack said:
Wow, Susan. You are so impressively wrong.
This episode wasn't as good as last week, but it was still better than essentially all of Smith's first first season.
**blinks**

Better than the Eleventh Hour? The Beast Below? The Vampires of Venice? The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood? Vincent and the Doctor? The Pandorica Opens/The Big Bang?

I would rate Matt Smith's first season (ie season 5) as one of the best overall seasons of the new series. Some of the previous seasons have had one super good episode or two (ie Family of Blood), but they are rarely as consistently good.

And I don't think Town Called Mercy holds up against any of the episodes listed above.
I'm glad you quoted me, I didn't realize I had made a mistake. It should read "first two seasons" The time-crack and the Silence were weak. And yes, (most) of those were good episodes, but the SEASONS were just... eh

Granted, Matt Smith's run on the show has been better than tennant's, both by ratio of quality and simply because Smith is the better Doctor, but I just don't understand why so many of you are hating these episodes. These are some of the BEST episodes Moffat-Who has had.

I just hope the series continues this way, without the pulled punches of the last series.
 

The Harkinator

Did something happen?
Jun 2, 2010
742
0
0
This episode had a lot of really good components, but because there were a lot they all had to try and push each other out of the way to get some time on screen. Plus the writers try to force in so many western tropes as well.

But all of these components didn't create something greater than the sum of its parts. It created a bit of a mess that would have benefited from either adding or subtracting 15 minutes off the time. A 30 minute piece would have resolved the episode without all of the extra distractions but a 60 minute episode would have allowed time to fully incorporate most other elements.

The moral dilemma was excellent in my book, it made the Doctor think about his own problems and really was more grey that we are used to. The bad guy was good, Adrian Scarborough plays Jex brilliantly and he really enhances the moral conundrum. Of course he has done terrible things, but he saved his people and has saved the town from disease. The Doctor may think no man is allowed to choose his own repentance but Jex really has done good.

But then we get to Amy and her part in the story, this episode is not companion friendly. Since it very much revolves around the Doctor and Jex and their morality Amy and Rory can only really float on the periphery and get the odd line in. Rory really didn't have much of a part in this, he followed a few people around but was little more than a spare pair of hands. Amy was, in my opinion, even less useful in this one because they TRIED to make her more useful as the Doctors conscience.

Her interactions with Jex don't seem to go anywhere really, her speech to change the Doctors mind reinforced my opinion that the Doctor was right originally to hand over the war criminal to the monster he created. So no points there, then the bit when she has a gun and looks ready to turn the show into "The Adventures of Action Amy" like in that pirate episode where she grabs a sword and proceeds to take on about seven pirates. Though it is nicely averted when she doesn't know really how to use it and starts firing wildly.

This episode was a collection of very good main ingredients and some poor trimmings that was badly made and resulted in the good stuff being rushed through.
 

Crispee

New member
Nov 18, 2009
462
0
0
I wasn't a fan of the moral dilema personally, or rather the way it ended. I'm getting kind of sick of episodes where The Doctor has to make a moral choice (Free or kill the Dalek in 'Dalek', Wipe out the humans and Daleks or do neither and let the Daleks kill the humans in 'Parting of the Ways', etc.) and it ends up sorting itself out before he decides (Dalek kills itself, Rose kills the Daleks.), it always strikes as being written into a corner so as not to make The Doctor feel guilty for another murder.

I don't mind The Doctor pointing a gun at another living thing so much though, I actually thought it was quite in character for him assuming they're going down the route of the Valeyard. Or if you take note of the murders he's committed in the other episodes of this series alone.

I do think Amy was being a bit self righteous though, she herself killed the alternate Madam Koverian last series, there was even an entire sequence of dialogue in which she claimed Amy would save her because The Doctor would, and she basically says "The Doctor isn't here so I can murder you all I like.", sure she immediately regrets it but she doesn't even bring her hypocrisy up during her exchange with The Doctor about finding an alternate method. And as other posters have mentioned, she would've killed all of the Flesh Gangers from the start if she had her way.

Not my favorite episode of this series (Though I happen to think the previous episodes are absolutely top notch.).
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
saintdane05 said:
If you know Matt Smith, you will realize that he tones himself down to be less eccentric.

And besides, Tom Baker doesn't look as hot without a shirt.

I'm not trying to be disparaging to Matt Smith, largely because he is my favourite Doctor of the new ones, but in terms of eccentricity he pales in comparison to some of the old Doctors.

Tom Baker grew up in time when you could be killed by the Luftwaffe overnight and then left school at 15 to become one of the very few Jewish Roman Catholic monks. He then left the monastery after losing his faith to do his national service, during which he was in constant trouble for fighting.


Patrick Troughton was returning to the UK in 1940 when his ship hit mine and he escaped in a lifeboat. The next 4 years he spent in the royal navy during which he engaged the might of the 3rd Reich while wearing a tea cosy on his head.

John Pertwee also served in the navy during the war. He was on HMS Hood but transferred of it just before its destruction, losing all but 3 of its 1400 crew. He spent the rest of the war in naval intelligence, a position which he used to blackmail his way into his 1st acting role. Part of his job was to check that entertainments was not giving away secrets, he would only give clearance if they gave a role in the entertainment.

I'm sure if Smith had similar life experiences as the others he would have developed the same level of not giving a dam what anyone thought, but the very fact he can tone it down means its not quite as central to his personality. Smith is a great echo of the past doctors but as with all echoes its not quite the real thing.