About 25% of Americans Don't Know the Earth Revolves Around the Sun

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
My opinions here are *gasp* mixed.

I think part of the problem is ingrained paranoia, simply put if someone presents an easy question a lot of people look for a trick to be involved, or at least an angle. A lot of people when presented with the obvious will choose the counter-intuitive selection to try and avoid being made to look like a fool and "biting" even if it has the opposite effect. I don't think it's trolling so much as how overpopulated societies have conditioned people. When something good seems about to happen, the first thing a lot of people do is look for the angle.

I'll also say that people tend to forget about anti-educational movements. Bill Cosby has done some rather brutal breakdowns of the relationship between black culture and education (he has a PHD in Children's Education). Among the things he's talked about is how for a lot of blacks education is seen as "selling out" with Black America squandering the opportunities it's been given. Rather than being part of society, you have the "git rich or die trying" attitude which basically amounts to how it's only 'okay' to be part of the 1% and if you can't make it there on innate ability, then it's more noble to become a criminal and thug, even if the odds are you'll wind up face down in a ghetto with a gun in your hand and drugs in your pocket... as at least you then tried to get to the top 1% without selling out to society where you likely wouldn't have amounted to anything anyway. In some cases it's even turned into a case where being a normal person like everyone else is equated with slavery, whether the guy has a bullwhip or a paycheck he's holding over your head, the bottom line is you take orders from someone else... forget that pretty much everyone in the civilized world lives this way and it's part of what makes a civilization. A lot of Black America will literally destroy textbooks, computers, and other things people have lined up to give them rather than "sell out" and use them. Bill Cosby ultimately articulates things far better than I do if you look his stuff up, I don't agree with a lot of what he says politically, but he really did a lot to form some of my opinions about education (and that goes beyond this particular issue).

Now before anyone misconstrues this, I will say intelligence and education are two entirely different things. Being uneducated does not make someone stupid (though it can make them seem stupid). While people are shocked that someone could get basic facts wrong (beyond the opinion based stuff others have pointed out) understand that there are plenty
of places in the US where I'd be shocked if it went beyond 50% (given that a guess on a yes/no question still means getting it right half the time).

Likewise I'm one of those people who will point fingers at some of the other countries that like to be touted as examples of US bashing. For example when you deal with places like China, India, and other countries where their societies literally range from having huge, modern, cities with everything you can conceive of, to abject poverty where some people live much like they did in The Middle Ages or even worse, it becomes hard to take comparisons seriously. For example when being told China "scores higher than the US in their educational system" understand that the people that get to be educated in China are something of an elite, representing the equivalent of a private school education. It's not accounting for the majority of the population that work in sweat shops and might share mats inside of stacked dog crates for sleeping space, or bust their backs every day knee deep in a rice paddy, and might have to share their living arrangements with their livestock (which is how SARS got started). India has similar problems, which actually harken back to their caste system (which hasn't been abolished as much as people might want to believe, recent articles about an Indian envoy in the US and the way she kept her servants kind of demonstrate this, especially with India itself defending her). The point being that when countries get to choose their own reps for studies, or control what outside studies get to survey, it leads to biased results. A lot of the "America Bashing" in comparisons (which people here have been concerned about) comes from the fact that the US tends to largely play by the rules in such comparisons. and doesn't generally put it's best forward to represent the country. All you need to do to make America look like a group of idiots is go to some poor area with a heavy black representation (due to the cultural issues I mention above) or where education isn't important to survival in general, and your going to score really low, indeed it's amazing how we DO score due to our public educational system, when you consider what we're actually up against. If the US wanted to it could produce highly educated people of any ethnicity to represent itself, but that isn't how we roll when we're doing these polls "fairly".

-

Now to leave those who read this far with an odd question that has always kind of tormented poor uneducated Therumancer...

When it comes to making Cheese, a big part of doing it involves a substance called "Rennet" which is an enzyme that comes from inside the stomach (usually a cow's stomach). How the heck did anyone ever figure that out given how long people have been making cheese. I mean was some cave man or pre-Roman barbarian sitting there churning up random elements from slain cattle for lulz and somehow stumbled across this process? :)

At any rate, I've kind of wondered if anyone has a good answer to that one. Personally I've always thought that was ironically one of the better arguments for alien visitations because really I can't see how primitive man would have been able to figure out how to use one specific enzyme from inside a stomach to create cheese unless someone told them, with Cheese being a staple food that occurred though a lot of the world, meaning it seems a lot of people in a lot of different areas all managed to figure this out somehow and well... :)

I'm sure there is a better answer for that though. I mostly thought of it because of the whole "cheese is vegetable" (as opposed to dairy) thing someone mentioned. To be fair when you get down to it, it seems not many people know much about cheese. I asked this question at a few of the "Olde Historical villages/reinactments" where they go off about early cheese making and such and they mention how to make it, using the Enzymes, and even make cheese the old fashioned way themselves to demonstrate (and sell in the gift shops) but not one person could actually tell me this...
 

Talvrae

The Purple Fairy
Dec 8, 2009
896
0
0
It's not just America, it's an occidental problem. Canada have 45% of functional illetrate for thouse betwen 16-45 years old for exemple
 

cikame

New member
Jun 11, 2008
585
0
0
Yeah the evolution and life questions are stupid, i'm not religious but i wouldn't pin them as being wrong... until we can prove it all without a doubt, then i'll shove it in their faces.

As far as basic science questions go it doesn't suprise me, i've met plenty of people who sincerely believe things which are completely false.
 

GabeZhul

New member
Mar 8, 2012
699
0
0
Keiichi Morisato said:
VanQ said:
MrHide-Patten said:
Americuh, Fuck Yeah!
Sorry if this sounds like a sterotype, but was this sample from Texas?

I honestly don't want to know how Australia fares, ignorance is bliss. Ironically.
Cue all the people going on about "theories" and "unconfirmed", blahty, blah.
Nothing infuriates me more than when people say something like "Well, evolution is just a theory!", completely oblivious to the meaning of the word theory in a scientific context. That the word theory means something that can be observed and reproduced, such as evolution.

Australia is considered one of the smarter nations, but I'm almost certain that it's just a few very bright people carrying the weight of a very dumb overall populace. Most people don't care to educate themselves on matters more difficult than the location of the nearest pub.
micro evolution can be observed and reproduced, not macro evolution. right now no one definitively knows anything about our origins, and for a true way to test it out, would take thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of years of observation. so right now arguing the validity of one theory or another is pointless. who know maybe we were simply created as stated in one of the many other religions. and being an atheist is a religion, just atheists practice science and what not, and believe that we are our own god so to speak.
You are the people Poe's Law was invented for. Seriously, you managed to package every single fundamentalist/creationist straw-man, falsehood and fallacy into a single post so well I am tempted to put a pretty bow on it and call it art.

So, to break it down:
-There is no such thing as "micro-evolution" or "macro-evolution". There is just evolution, period. What you call "macro-evolution" is nothing more than your "micro-evolution" given time, so they are literally the same.

-We do not need to observe something directly to know how it works based on the data we gather about it. Say, can you observe how the electrons in the computer you just used to write that post created it? No? Well, I suppose that means that your post is just a theory and we cannot know anything bout it. Therefore I can propose that it was probably done by a fairy with magic and you cannot say anything in response. That, or it was gremlins. It's always gremlins...

-There is no "other theory". What religions have are not theories but myths and stone/bronze age tales with zero evidence to back them up.

-No, atheism is not a religion. It's the lack of religion. I know it's kind of hard to wrap one's head around it, especially if said head has been filled with religious dogma from a young age, but when people say they don't believe in any god in general and your god in particular, they actually mean it.

-Saying that "atheists practice science" is such a colossal... something I don't even know what to call it! Delusion? Yes, let's go with that. It once again comes from some religious zealot's belief that one has to worship someone, since they do, their family does and everyone else in their environment also does so, therefore they simply cannot imagine that someone can exist without "practicing faith" and thus concoct this inane idea that "atheists has to worship science" so that that their limited little world would remain intact.

-The "one's own god" argument is just so incredibly asinine and silly I can't even muster the indignation to even refute it. I mean, what is there to refute? That's like saying one who doesn't believe in unicorns thinks that they are their own unicorn. What does that even mean?!

cikame said:
Yeah the evolution and life questions are stupid, i'm not religious but i wouldn't pin them as being wrong... until we can prove it all without a doubt, then i'll shove it in their faces.
Then all you have to do is read up on them a little, as there really is no doubt there. It's just that some people (read: young earth creationists, Christian fundamentalist and professional demagogues like Ken Ham, Ray Comfort or Eric Hovind) would like people to think that there is a controversy or that we are not sure about them yet.
To give an example, imagine a court case. A murder case where you have the victim's body, the crime scene, the murder weapon covered in the victim's blood, the suspect covered in the victim's blood with his fingerprints all over the scene, the weapon and the victim alongside his DNA, people have seen him arrive at the scene before the murder and leave right after, covered in red stuff... and the attorney would argue that because no-one has actually seen him commit the murder then no one can be 100% sure it was the suspect, therefore they cannot pass a verdict on him. It would be laughed out of the courtroom.
The term "beyond reasonable doubt" exists for a reason.
 

Roofstone

New member
May 13, 2010
1,641
0
0
To their defense, I have no idea what antibiotics specifically do. I know that if I am sick and take em, I will be less sick. But I dunno how.
 

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
Elfgore said:
The belief based questions, like the evolution and start of the universe, is not fair to ask. They answered wrong because they believe differently. That's just a low-blow.

Now the earth rotating question is inexcusable.
I was trying to find a nice way to say what you just said. I give you a thumbs up. The way this survey was worded--or at leas the way this article is worded--really rubs me the wrong way.
 

Joos

Golden pantaloon.
Dec 19, 2007
662
0
0
Megazuurkool said:
I am not going into the issue whether the universe was created by an explosion or whether we humans developed from animals, but those people did not believe that. Surely they knew there were people who believed it to have happened that way, but if you don't believe in this theory, of course you'll fill in that it isn't correct. There are a lot of people who don't support the evolution theory, big bang, my ancestors were apes etc.. and if that's what you believe you are not stupid for saying 'no' to the whole theory thingy.

I'm so sorry for my English.
Actually, you might be somewhat correct in that they are not necessarily stupid. But if someone claims they don't believe in the theory of evolution (for whatever reason) it typically mean that they are at least gullible. Or believe what they want to hear and have allowed themselves to have become indoctrinated in a world view that puts opinion of truth higher than proof of truth. And if that is not stupid to you, I don't know what is.

If you have an opinion which is overwhelmingly proven to be wrong and you don't change your opinion according to what is demonstrably true, you are indeed stupid. Unreasonable and stupid and that's that.

Also, I would like to point out to whatever moderator that might be reading this that I'm not calling anyone stupid in this post, I'm arguing definitions.
 

Klagermeister

New member
Jun 13, 2008
719
0
0
BigTuk said:
Well if you're going to take the jok seriously let me pose this one to you smart guy. Assuming intelligent design.. why would god design sperm that are damaged by the body's natural temperature...you have to always remember that when you consider intelligent design by an omnipotent super being that literally writes the rules of universal reality he could have just have easily made us use high voltage electricity as semen and it would have worked just as well (also it would make every porn movie and sex 10 times more awesome and 11 times more Metal!)

See how that works, when you apply logical extension to creative design you realize that the idea of it falls apart. Why do we have two lungs? Intelligent design... then why design us to require air in the first place? He could have just haveeasily made us so we don't need to breathe and everything would work perfectly... unless you suggest the ombnipotent super being is himself bound by immutable rules that even he cannot go against...
>Implying I don't believe in evolution
The fact that I believe in God has little to nothing to do with my scientific standing.
Evolution is well documented and makes a large amount of sense, but to me personally, it wouldn't make sense for that to be all there is.
Evolution explains the how, but not the why. That's where my religious belief comes in.

But here you go, going full strawman to call me stupid when I clearly made no argument against evolution.
I suppose you're just doing this for a little attention, hence the grammatical and spelling errors, but let's look at your reasoning, shall we?
"If there's a slightly more efficient way to bypass an evolutionary disadvantage, then clearly God would have given us space lasers on our crotches and we'd all beam the internet to our brain stems subconsciously!"

I suppose you're an atheist, correct? The kind that finds any belief in God whatsoever to be absolutely baffling and hence you feel some divine duty to bash the shit out of any religious opinion on the internet.
Not a thing you've said to anyone in this thread has convinced me otherwise.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,581
0
0
See, this is why I hate the fact that it's called the "Theory" of Evolution, because Evolution really is the most sound model we've found that explains on origins, based on a few centuries spent recording evidence - from Darwin's observations of Madagascar's birds all the way to modern archaeological finds.

At this point, the word "Theory" just feels needlessly polite to me. I get that it's in constant need of tweaking and re-jiggerring, I get that a few million years get shuffled this way and that depending on new carbon-dating techniques or correlated finds; but we *are* getting closer to something that'll probably be incontrovertible.

In the meantime, ignorant believers looking for an easy way out can just go "Oh, but you're not sure, are you? It's a theory! Well, we're sure! God's on our side!"

Which never fails to trigger a circle-jerk in which one side can argue for the anthropological reasonings behind the creation of a benevolent creator entity as Primitive Man's attempt to grasp the world, and the other more or less parrots the word "Faith" ad nauseam.

Sorry if that sounded slightly hostile, it's just that I've been friends with a guy since high school. He turned Evangelical, I turned hardcore Atheist and an all-around lover of science. Every time we meet, our conversation starts to feel like he'd be ready to bungee jump without a cord at the behest of the Man Upstairs, and I come across to him as some sort of cartoony, Will to Power, Nietzchean type. We're both biased in our own way, so of course something about what the other believes in will always seem ridiculous.

I don't resent him for it, it's just that we have this twice-a-year meeting schedule and every single time, he throws me some variant on "Still a Godless heathen, buddy?"

And, well, that kinda gets my goat. My morals aren't religious in origin, I just consciously try to live my life as a decent guy, as opposed to an asshole.
 

DrOswald

New member
Apr 22, 2011
1,443
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
What happens when you invest ludicrous amounts of money into a bloated military, and nothing into education and health?

Something like this.

Gotta be looking at priorities when your military spending is X times the number of the next X countries combined.
The United States spends more money per student than most other countries in the world. And the US spends significantly more on health than anyone else in the world per person. It would be good for you to actually check your facts before you start spouting nonsense.
 

1337mokro

New member
Dec 24, 2008
1,503
0
0
The first question is already wrong. The Big Bang is not a literal term. It was actually coined by the religious soft heads to mock the idea of an expanding universe. It was just really catchy so everyone calls it a big bang.

The universe started EXPANDING after the event known as the Big Bang, there is no explosion. So the 39% that answered yes? They are the stupid ones. The people that answered no either knew there was no explosion, because there is no (known) centre of the universe, everything is moving apart equally fast from everything else meaning that space itself is expanding meaning nothing that we understand as an explosion (an expansion within space from a singular point) could describe what we are seeing, or answered no because they don't believe in science.

So we can basically put this survey in the damned shredder because there's something wrong with every question.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
America might spend more per student, but if this survey is anything to go by, they are teaching their students the wrong things.
 

Blow_Pop

Supreme Evil Overlord
Jan 21, 2009
4,863
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
Before we get all of the "Wow! What kind of ignorant and stupid person doesn't know that stuff!!!?", I'm going to chime in and say that this seems kind of expected.

Has anyone ever watched "Are you smarter than a 5th grader"? The contestants on the show answer questions about basic information that you would find in subjects up to the 5th grade. These people know the type of questions they are going to be getting and (I'd assume at least with the amount of money you can win), studied up on what they could see. Many of them still get stuck in the game. Why is that?

It perfectly demonstrates this exact thing we're seeing here. You don't realize but you forget a LOT of shit that school taught you because 90% of people don't need to know it in order to function and do their jobs. I remember a lot of this stuff because I loved school, useless trivia, and some of these things fascinate me but if you don't use the info stored in your brain, you lose it. We don't use the vast majority of these "Fun Facts" and so you're brain kicks them out for more important things in life like money management, the proper way to cook chicken so you don't all die, and how to juggle chainsaws.
Except for the fact that a lot of 5th graders aren't always taught some of the shit they come up with on that show......


And my first thought was were they all from So Cal?


None of this surprises me. Our educational system is terrible. I mean for fuck's sake, growing up in So Cal I was taught the Mexican American revolution was strictly just something to do with the Alamo. Not that it had to do with the U.S. trying to buy Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California from Mexico them telling us no and us basically going "fuck you we're taking them anyway"(mind that's a very very basic summary and many other things happened in it but the fact we weren't even taught that much is appalling is what I'm trying to get at). Look at how many of us can't do basic mathematics like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. We try and cram a bunch of information into kids' heads and half of it is either incorrect or useless(I mean seriously some of the classes I had to take to graduate high school made me go wtf? and I haven't used any of the information from them since those classes).
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
suitepee7 said:
as much as i'd like to cry "oh we're doomed, such a powerful nation filled with idiots" it wouldn't be fair or accurate in the slightest. if this was actually representative of a whole country, then fair enough, but this sample size is really really small, and not even close to a representation of a city, let alone a country...

still, the people who answered were fucking idiots for getting those questions wrong xD
2,200 is a fair sample size for surveys smaller ones have been used with great precision. Claims that this isn't representative because of the size are wrong. We base results from Gallup polls on less, sometimes, and those are treated as reliable.

And they may or may not be methodologically, but they are statistically and in terms of representation.

Daaaah Whoosh said:
I'll admit, I would have probably said that antibiotics kill viruses. I mean, they're a type of medicine, and you take medicine for viruses, and it's not like you're trapping the viruses and releasing them into the wild or something.
Antibiotics are what the Reapers use to mess with the Normandy.

In fairness, though, my answer would have probably been something like "Yes. Wait-no!" While I understand that antiobitics are not used to deal with viruses (antivirals are), there's an almost programmed correlation we make between being sick and taking antibiotics to get better.

Arnoxthe1 said:
Don't even get me started on that "Big Bang" crap. It's just a theory that hasn't been fully developed at ALL yet. But hey, let's all force undeveloped theories down each others throats. And Evolution... Some atheists blame us for having a narrow-minded viewpoint but then they turn around and do the exact same thing.
Evolution is reproducible and demonstrable. Not to mention developed in large part by Christians, so the whole "atheist" thing is kind of silly. Shouldn't you be angry at those closed-minded theists as well? But since you brought it up, the big bang theory is just a theory: a theory being the most solid an idea can get in terms of scientific demonstrability (outside of laws, which are another kettle of fish, and there's a reason we have laws and theories regarding the same things). The BBT is a very well-developed theory.

So if you are discounting something based on not knowing what "theory" means or the development behind it, don't call other people closed-minded, because that is completely closed-minded. I mean, you're literally condemning something you don't understand.

WanderingFool said:
Would it be possible to see the rest of the questions? Cause something tells me that its not so much ignorance as it is answering questions based on beliefs (like the evolutionj and Big Bang questions.)
Errr...That's still ignorance.

Regardless, these numbers are out of step with the number of people who believe in geocentrism, so I doubt it's just about belief.
 

Imp_Emissary

Mages Rule, and Dragons Fly!
Legacy
May 2, 2011
2,315
1
43
Country
United States
Grouchy Imp said:
*Prepares snarky comment ragging on American stupidity*

*Remembers survey last year which found 1 in 3 UK <16s think cheese is made from plants*

*Goes and sits quietly in corner*
As an Imp from Wisconsin (The dairy State), I find that a bit scarier than the "Do antibiotics kill viruses?" question results.

<.< Not as scary as the earth going around the sun question results though.

I feel your pain, Grouchy.

*sits in the corner with you*
 

Haukur Isleifsson

New member
Jun 2, 2010
234
0
0
It was very funny seeing the reaction over here when this came out. Everyone was saying Americans were so stupid and ill informed. But than I pointed out to them that in a very similar survey some 8 years ago something like 36% of Icelanders did not know that the earth revolved around the sun.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Blow_Pop said:
Except for the fact that a lot of 5th graders aren't always taught some of the shit they come up with on that show......
I always wonder that. Don't they/didn't they claim these questions all came out of textbooks? I find that hard to believe. I'd like to see those textbooks, since I didn't get most of those facts out of any of mine. Some of them weren't addressed until I was in college, some not at all in school.


And my first thought was were they all from So Cal?
This is America. There's plenty of ignorance to go around.


None of this surprises me. Our educational system is terrible. I mean for fuck's sake, growing up in So Cal I was taught the Mexican American revolution was strictly just something to do with the Alamo. Not that it had to do with the U.S. trying to buy Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California from Mexico them telling us no and us basically going "fuck you we're taking them anyway"(mind that's a very very basic summary and many other things happened in it but the fact we weren't even taught that much is appalling is what I'm trying to get at). Look at how many of us can't do basic mathematics like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. We try and cram a bunch of information into kids' heads and half of it is either incorrect or useless(I mean seriously some of the classes I had to take to graduate high school made me go wtf? and I haven't used any of the information from them since those classes).
I remember getting in trouble with arguing with a teacher because she was teaching us Columbus sailed to America to prove the Earth was round. Granted, I was a precocious little kid, but it amazes me what we're being taught and by who.

And on that note, I'm going to leave this here.


Forgive the 90s-ness, folks. I prefer the original but this one's easy to find.
 

Phantom Kat

New member
Sep 26, 2012
121
0
0
Therumancer said:
Now to leave those who read this far with an odd question that has always kind of tormented poor uneducated Therumancer...

When it comes to making Cheese, a big part of doing it involves a substance called "Rennet" which is an enzyme that comes from inside the stomach (usually a cow's stomach). How the heck did anyone ever figure that out given how long people have been making cheese. I mean was some cave man or pre-Roman barbarian sitting there churning up random elements from slain cattle for lulz and somehow stumbled across this process? :)

At any rate, I've kind of wondered if anyone has a good answer to that one. Personally I've always thought that was ironically one of the better arguments for alien visitations because really I can't see how primitive man would have been able to figure out how to use one specific enzyme from inside a stomach to create cheese unless someone told them, with Cheese being a staple food that occurred though a lot of the world, meaning it seems a lot of people in a lot of different areas all managed to figure this out somehow and well... :)
To preface: This is little more than a hypothesis and I don't know too much about cheese making.

Possible answer: It could be that they used a cow's stomach that hadn't been properly washed to store the milk (like a waterskin, or a bit like a haggis) or at least transport it, leading the milk to be contaminated with rennet. I think you've made a false assumption that the primitive person would be deliberately seeking to make cheese.

EDIT: Well shit, turns out that was a possible explanation given for it on wikipedia.

OT: The first question is pretty bad as technically there was no "huge explosion", according to the "big bang" theory, but other people have mentioned this already. I don't think the survey was very well done and I'd take the results with more than a pinch of salt.
 

Ghaleon640

New member
Jan 13, 2011
441
0
0
You can prove anything with a survey, just target your particular sample and expand it to the rest of the population of the US. This is just... stupid. Did you know that 100% of the U.S. watches breaking bad? Its cool, I asked two guys.