Then that makes the whole song ironic, right?Daystar Clarion said:Yes.
It's ironic, because it's a song written by somebody who has no idea what irony is.Jonluw said:Then that makes the whole song ironic, right?Daystar Clarion said:Yes.
Which means the title fits.
Which means it isn't ironic.
In Alanis Morisette's case, yes.Daystar Clarion said:It's ironic, because it's a song written by somebody who has no idea what irony is.
Well, yeah, both scenarios are different types of irony.Jonluw said:In Alanis Morisette's case, yes.Daystar Clarion said:It's ironic, because it's a song written by somebody who has no idea what irony is.
But remember, in this hypothetical scenario I'm pitching, the song doesn't make any mention of irony at all. It's just titled irony for seemingly no reason.
But in that case the title is fitting, isn't it, seeing how the song is ironic because it doesn't include irony.Daystar Clarion said:As is a song written by somebody who does understand irony, but didn't include any for the lulz.
Like I said, this can only end in 2 scenarios, both of them being ironic.Jonluw said:But in that case the title is fitting, isn't it, seeing how the song is ironic because it doesn't include irony.Daystar Clarion said:As is a song written by somebody who does understand irony, but didn't include any for the lulz.
What I'm saying is that it's a paradox.Daystar Clarion said:Like I said, this can only end in 2 scenarios, both of them being ironic.