When games like that makes that kind of money, it clearly shows something is wrong with the way the world works.
Is it? They aren't as bad as ea, which has gobbled up dozens of studios. Blizzard is still around doing its stupid blizzard thing, pretty much the same way it always has.Pinky said:They killed Troika, just split off Blizzard and let it die. The name Activision is poison.BiH-Kira said:Well, here is hope that Activision will be in deep shit thanks to this so they might have to start making good video games like they did a decade ago.
Well... Youd'd be wrong actually.weirdee said:Now, see, at least Minecraft somehow manages to continue producing milk no matter how ridiculous or farfetched the idea is, but even this game is pretty much a one trick pony that isn't nearly as marketable as Angry Birds.
Unless they insider traded on the option market (which a ton of people undoubtedly did) it only represents a small gain.Hairless Mammoth said:The only bad news about that proposed scenario is the people at King who don't deserve to lose their jobs... will. The greedy ones will be laughing all the way to the bank as soon as the buyout is approved.
AAA publishers have developed a microtransactions fetish. Doesn't it make sense they want to get their hands on the game famous for selling the most microtransactions ever, no matter what?dragongit said:You're telling me Disney bought the ENTIRE Star Wars franchise for 4 billion Dollars, and here Activision buys out King who is only really known for Candy Crush Saga, for nearly 6 BILLION DOLLARS!? let me emphasize the previous statement, star wars was bought out for 4 billion, this was bought for 6... WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK!?
Activision sure does.Objectable said:... People still care about Candy Crush?
I always take those kinds of numbers with a grain of salt, since publishers like to mix up the terms 'active' and 'registered'.Loonyyy said:Either way, 500 million active users. That's just kind of mental, it's remarkable by just how much these games dwarf most of the "core" releases. Says a lot for how relevant we, and our opinions, really are.
That still doesn't make any sort of sense. You're looking at almost 10 years of profit at that level in order to make back your investment. Now, Candy Crush is a popular game, but all that we've seen says that the number will deteriorate quick. That's the nature of mobile gaming.Loonyyy said:As pointed out in the very news article that's being commented on, King made $641 million in Q1 of 2014. That's why Activision paid that much.
So far as this being ridiculous, the end of Activision or whatever, it doesn't look like it. It looks like they just bought another cash cow IP to sit alongside WoW.
I wonder what their game plan is with this, does King have anything else on the fly, or are we going to see a dozen variations on Candy Crush like Rovio did with Angry Birds?
Either way, 500 million active users. That's just kind of mental, it's remarkable by just how much these games dwarf most of the "core" releases. Says a lot for how relevant we, and our opinions, really are.