Trust me... No, you're just being a gamer, hating the man who wants to charge you more.whyarecarrots said:Is it bad that I'm just enjoying the thought of Activision and Bobby Kotick getting something so monumentally wrong?
It is, but you have to draw the line on how much money you are going to give to the hobby. Bobby breaks the limit.JimmyBassatti said:I have actually gained a respect for Activision and ol' Bobby after reading that in Game Informer. He's not really the devil everyone claims him to be (But, then again, just about everyone is willing to crucify a publisher/developer if they don't release a screenshot, to say the least).I thought being a gamer was about actually playing games, not bitching about one person in an industry that has millions of people doing millions of things.sirdanrhodes said:Trust me... No, you're just being a gamer, hating the man who wants to charge you more.whyarecarrots said:Is it bad that I'm just enjoying the thought of Activision and Bobby Kotick getting something so monumentally wrong?
No, it means you're human.whyarecarrots said:Is it bad that I'm just enjoying the thought of Activision and Bobby Kotick getting something so monumentally wrong?
True. I know people love to hate Kotick and Activision but I wouldn't have bought Blizzard back in 19995 either.malestrithe said:To be honest, in 1995, they weren't worth 7,000,000. Remember such classics as Lord of the Rings: Vol. 1, Battle Chess 1 and 2, Blackthorne, Dvorak on Typing, Rock and Roll Racing, and the Lost Vikings? In 1995, they made Justice League Task Force, arguably the worst fighter ever made. Warcraft 1 barely came out and Warcraft 2 was also getting released. In 1995, none of the franchises that made Blizzard fanboys were made. No Diablo, No Starcraft, no Warcraft 3. There was certainly no WoW, something that no one could have predicted.
Now it might be nice to kick people for not having forsight, but it is not fair. You cannot predict the future. All you can do is make assertions based on the recent past.
Space CoD would be very interesting to play if they did it right..Paragon Fury said:We might actually have Starcraft 2 by now?
With LAN.
But no mods.
And we'd have Space CoD by now.
Simple: There wouldn't be a blizzard.John Funk said:...how would the gaming landscape have changed if Activision had been the one to acquire Blizzard in 1995 for that (relative) chump change?
*Handshake*whyarecarrots said:Is it bad that I'm just enjoying the thought of Activision and Bobby Kotick getting something so monumentally wrong?
and as a result pc gaming would have really ever taken off, and rts games would never have been a big hit (or as big as starcraft and warcraft are now).rougeknife said:Simple: There wouldn't be a blizzard.John Funk said:...how would the gaming landscape have changed if Activision had been the one to acquire Blizzard in 1995 for that (relative) chump change?
Not at all. Just proves that Kotick is nothing more than a heel with no real insight into things apart from charge people for hype.whyarecarrots said:Is it bad that I'm just enjoying the thought of Activision and Bobby Kotick getting something so monumentally wrong?