Starcraft probably wouldn't have been made. To say nothing of WOW. Diablo might have been made, though I'm pretty sure it would have rewritten the definition of suck.
They already are. And a blizzard fan-boy can't report me!Rainboq said:A bunch of devs. trying to rip off anything they can findOnyx Oblivion said:What would Blizzard have been worth if they didn't create World of Warcraft?
I agree with everything this man just said!fix-the-spade said:Easy, we'd be on Shanghai 15 and Blizzard would be known worldwide as creatively bankrupt hack developers, Starcraft never gets made, why would an adventure and sports game developer make an RTS? It's not what we pay them for. WoW never gets made, it's too big a risk and the competition (FF11, SWG) is too well established and not profitable enough to justify the cost...
It's only their massive success that gives them relative freedom from Activision, if that hadn't been there they'd have been crushed and talent stripped within five years.
They still got Starcraft which is the next best selling PC after WoW, then Warcraft 3 and Diablo 1, 2.Onyx Oblivion said:What would Blizzard have been worth if they didn't create World of Warcraft?
yea, Warcaft 3 did took quite some time to make. But it start out as a RTS, I think you mess up Warcraft Adventure: Lord of the Clan with Warcraft 3. Warcraft Adventure was a point and click game that never got released.domicius said:Hindsight's 20/20. There are no guarantees that Blizzard would have made it. Frankly, if memory serves, even Warcraft 3 took an age to develop, having originally started life as an RPG and only later being moved over to a strategy game.
Changing around games like that, and taking an age to develop a game are very large risks in the game development space (hello, Duke Nukem). So I can see how a rational business decision might have been "no, not for me".
Once Blizzard had made it, it's easy to say "What if." But life's not so clear up front, is it now?