tiredinnuendo said:
Shamus did an Experienced Points on Kotick which I felt made some pretty good arguments. In brief, the TLDR version is that Kotick lucked into a really good job, and frankly doesn't have the savvy and talent for it, but from a market perspective it's better to keep him on than to replace him.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/experienced-points/8169-Experienced-Points-Age-of-Kotick
So what if he lucked into a really good job and isn't worthy of it? If estimations reason that it's more effective to keep him in place, then I see nothing wrong with keeping him in place.
Regardless, what I was saying is that we shouldn't care, and just play the games we want to play, regardless of who endorses or publishes them. There'll always be something to hate, and there'll always be more important things to hate on. Kotick is just a man with a loose mouth- at the end of the day, he'll always be kept in check by his peers and stopped from starting the apocalypse, like most people seem to think he's capable of.
Any time his name is mentioned, people come forward with barrages of insults and death threats, which doesn't exactly paint a great picture of the gaming community.
Goodwin's Law effectively states that the longer you talk, the more likely a given topic is to come up. You could just as easily make it about kittens or pies and it would be exactly the same. It is not proof of anything, nor is it an argument winner. The internet needs to stop treating it as such.
- J
I never said it was proof of anything. Notice how it was edited in and not in any way related to my post. It's a fun coincidence to pick up on, and I treat it as nothing more.