Bahahaha.... this is funny.jaketheripper said:where did i say aything about a tutorial? and yes, a REAL GUITAR peripheral is better tech. the drums and mic are also better. And the devil and shit was much more distracting than a few people on stage. and i think the charts are fine. there as close as the real song that you can get with five buttons.Madmanonfire said:You're saying it's a better "game" because of the tutorial that's apart from the "game"? Great logic.jaketheripper said:rock band 3 is better than any other music game. due to the fact that i can actually play a guitar... so no it isnt a downgrade. better tech. better(and more) songs. i think rockband has some life left.Madmanonfire said:That makes about as much sense as LBP being able to compete with Mario. Try again. (Hint: Other way around)Jaime_Wolf said:Good. Guitar Hero ceased being able to compete with Rock Band years ago.
OT: GH6 was the perfect swan song for the franchise. If it weren't for oversaturation, GH could've been an amazing thing. Instead, it's just a great thing. Hopefully RB dies as well, as it's still a few years away from being able to match GH3, let alone GH6. We don't need such a downgrade continuing in GH's place.
- Better tech? Nope. Gameplay and mechanics are superior in GH6.
- Correction: More songs, not better songs. The RB3 on-disk setlist is similar to GH5. You'll have to pay extra for all of the good songs on DLC, and even those often have questionable charts. Provided you can see what you're trying to play, with all the blinding background crap in the way.
- You referred to pro-mode, which is pretty much a tutorial.
- And what about the regular guitar? You know, the one with the square frets and the silent strum bar? Let's not forget about that.
- Who said anything about distracting? I was talking about blinding stuff. The video effects, lighting effects, see-through tracks, and bright color overdrive effects are great at hiding notes.
- It's good that you think the charts are fine. That's all that matters, really.