This is exactly how I feel. Well, the first part. A lot of people tout the "golden age," but if they're talking about loony toons, I'm not really buying it. Yeah, they were good, but I almost never laugh at them. It's something I don't fully understand. I much prefer Johnny Bravo, Ed, Edd, & Eddy, the Power Puff girls, Dexter, and Samurai Jack (note that the last three are all by the same guy). At least, those are the ones I remember enjoying the most.FaustianBargain said:I am 100% of the opinion that cartoons have begun to make a comeback with the likes of Flapjack, Adventure Time, and Chowder. It's definitely no second golden age but as long as the people behind these shows stick around I think CN's lineup will get much better.
Now there's Johnny Test and Ben 10, which are awful, cliche, and poorly written. The reason Chowder and Adventure Time succeed in my mind is because they embrace the philosophy of the absurd. Why would you make a show where a little brother character foils his older sister's attempts win over some masculine stereotype? It's cliche and boring. "Yeah," they protest, "but he does it by turning them rainbow colored with something they built in their secret lab!" So what? I still know what's going to happen, almost down to the lines of dialog they're going to use. In Flapjack, they'd do stuff just to put you off guard. They employ verbal irony in visual or character themes, they set up a trope only to have a character go, "wait that's completely stupid. Why would anyone do that?" Speaking of, they break the forth wall. ("Chowder! You lit the kitchen on fire! Now the animators are gonna have to draw all this fire!") And most importantly, they're not afraid to ignore the thematic elements deemed "appropriate subject matter" by whatever amorphous blob spawned captain planet into existence.
Speaking of that, the worst cartoon on today is the cartoon teen drama "6teen." Or something like that. Fucking tripe.