Advice From a Fanboy: Superman Edition

[antigodoflife]

and don't forget. Make it 3 hours long so the back story is not skimmed.

 

[the Dept of Science]

I don't really read that many comics, but am curious to know; have there been any superman comics which focus on the fact that he has got the powers of a minor god, but spends a large amount of his time working in a job for a man that he could kill in a second, should he so please? I mean, I'm not a massive fan of Superman, but I always thought one of the more interesting facts about him would be how in everyday life he is a pretty forgettable man, but in secret, he can basically do whatever he wants.

I was thinking about how people could write Superman in particular, how it would be possible to do anything approaching a "gritty reboot" and the idea just struck me, was wondering if I was original or whether someone had done it before.

While it's not a Superman comic per se, The Dark Knight Returns touches on this brilliantly. Basically, Superman is Reagan's walking eff-you to the Soviets. I won't spoil any more for you, save to say that you get to see Batman and Superman really cut loose against each other... and it's fucking amazing.

I've read Dark Knight Returns, its very good but not quite what I was thinking of.

My idea was more like, seeing Superman working his everyday job, getting all the shit normal people get from their daily routine and how to cope with doing that, knowing full well that he is the most powerful man in the world.

 

[JayDig]

I hope the film makers will include a hundred foot robot for Superman to fight.
Oh, and don't give us another fucking origin story, everyone knows Superman.

And yes, shoehorning in 'fan-favorite' characters or storylines was definately a bad idea in Daredevil, X-men 3, Spiderman 3. I've spent so much time mentally re-writing those movies...

 

[Daniel Laeben-Rosen]

I heard that Tom Welling isn't ever going to put on the costume. Something about his contract...

Actually it's been revealed that he will be putting it on for the last season's finale(Please let this be the last season).
The reason they ignored the whole thing was that for a long time the show had the mantra; "No tights, no flights", noble intentions for the first few seasons, but as the show dragged on it just got silly.

 

[Varya]

Ok, so I gotta admit.. I can't f***ing stand superman, and it's all because of one silly flaw. If not for this, I totally love Superman. And it's like I'm the only one noticing this but SUPERMAN HAS NO FRIGGIN DISGUISE. I mean, most superheroes at least try and cover up their face, but Superman? He removes his glasses and put on boots that give him an extra inch!? And then they try to make me engaged in some plot where someone suspects that Clark Kent is Superman. NO SHIT, just look at a PHOTO of him.
And even if, he has some sort of hypnotic power that makes people oblivious to this fact, there are face-recognition softwares capable of deducing this fact that wont be fooled by a pair of glasses. And I know, we are supposed to suspend our disbelief but I just can't. I buy the aliens and magic and shit, but that people are just plain blind and cat see this fact? No, I can't do it. Talk about everyone ignoring the big pink elephant.
My solution? If you won't give him a new suit, kill of Clark. He is the most redundant part of Superman and I like him better in Justice League(from the animated series), when he appears to be Superman full time, than in any other incarnation when trying to juggle the mundane existence of Clark with his superhero life in a world full of very stupid people.

Phew, bit of a rant, but please, I can't be the only one bothered by this?

 

[Varya]

Also, the main reason I keep watching Smallville is that I want to see how they handle the Suit/Identity thing when he finally "goes public" If they, just like every other Superman incarnation, just ignore it, I will be really upset

 

[omegawyrm]

We're getting a DC Animated movie of All Star Superman relatively soon anyway, which will most likely put to shame any other efforts to commit Superman to film that have happened or will ever happen.

I've never read Waid's Birthright story, which is apparently what the new movie is being based on, but Morrison's Superman made me realize how ignorant I was during all those years of considering Superman to be one-dimensional and irrelevant.

 

[FFKonoko]

At first when I hit the bit where Toyman and such were mentioned and suggested I wondered if that section was in fact sarcasm. After all, it did mention that it was somewhat unserious.
But you know what...while those specific examples might not be good, playing it over the top could be a good idea. I actually liked Superman Returns, but even with all the Kryptonite...there wasn't really any satisfying heroics. He effortlessly did everything for a while. Then he got his ass kicked due to kryptonite. Then he lifted a big rock and coughed a bit. Some nice effects and all but...its not really the same as seeing two superpowered guys having an impressive, well down, rip-roaring rampage, an exciting visual spectacle that really shows the struggle and...well, fight.

But there seems to be a bit of a problem. Luthor would have to be a secondary antagonist, or a man behind the man, which might go down rather badly. Zod? Done that...Doomsday? Maybe a reworked version, but that could be even worse. So honestly, yeah, screw it. Toss in Toyman and the other low power wackos like him to be tacken down as build up but be visually interesting and still put up an interesting show on the way. Then something huge...alien invasion, darksied, whatever.

Though not Mxyzptlk. Never him.

 

[SpaceMedarotterX]

Oh for gods sake.

Superman is the Spirit of Hope
Batman is the Spirit of Justice
Wonder Woman is the Spirit of Truth

It's a very simple concept to grasp.

Ok, so I gotta admit.. I can't f***ing stand superman, and it's all because of one silly flaw. If not for this, I totally love Superman. And it's like I'm the only one noticing this but SUPERMAN HAS NO FRIGGIN DISGUISE. I mean, most superheroes at least try and cover up their face, but Superman? He removes his glasses and put on boots that give him an extra inch!? And then they try to make me engaged in some plot where someone suspects that Clark Kent is Superman. NO SHIT, just look at a PHOTO of him.
And even if, he has some sort of hypnotic power that makes people oblivious to this fact, there are face-recognition softwares capable of deducing this fact that wont be fooled by a pair of glasses. And I know, we are supposed to suspend our disbelief but I just can't. I buy the aliens and magic and shit, but that people are just plain blind and cat see this fact? No, I can't do it. Talk about everyone ignoring the big pink elephant.
My solution? If you won't give him a new suit, kill of Clark. He is the most redundant part of Superman and I like him better in Justice League(from the animated series), when he appears to be Superman full time, than in any other incarnation when trying to juggle the mundane existence of Clark with his superhero life in a world full of very stupid people.

Phew, bit of a rant, but please, I can't be the only one bothered by this?

The thing is no one is looking for Supermans 'Secret Identity' because he gives them no reason to. He doesn't wear a mask, he acts completely normal. Lex Luthor isn't going "Who's Superman's secret identity" he just goes "That damn ALIEN!" because there is no mask!, John Stewert and Guy Gardner didn't wear masks as Green Lanterns, hell they went by there real names! Kyle Rayner wore a mask and everyone close to him (and far from him) figured it out. Superman is like John and Guy, he isn't giving them a mystery to solve so they don't care! He's not Spiderman who wears a full body suit to hide his identity.

I don't really read that many comics, but am curious to know; have there been any superman comics which focus on the fact that he has got the powers of a minor god, but spends a large amount of his time working in a job for a man that he could kill in a second, should he so please? I mean, I'm not a massive fan of Superman, but I always thought one of the more interesting facts about him would be how in everyday life he is a pretty forgettable man, but in secret, he can basically do whatever he wants.

I was thinking about how people could write Superman in particular, how it would be possible to do anything approaching a "gritty reboot" and the idea just struck me, was wondering if I was original or whether someone had done it before.

While it's not a Superman comic per se, The Dark Knight Returns touches on this brilliantly. Basically, Superman is Reagan's walking eff-you to the Soviets. I won't spoil any more for you, save to say that you get to see Batman and Superman really cut loose against each other... and it's fucking amazing.

OT: Sorry MovieBob, but I really can't agree with what you're saying. You seem to argue including the campiest elements of the Superman mythos, just to keep the uber-nerds happy. "Great Rhoa"?? Really? Why don't we just get "Holy metal rocks" Robin back in the Batman franchise as well? That'll keep the fans happy.

Silly antagonists? Krypto? A film adaption should take what's good from the Superman comic, not just random goofy details for nerds to wank over.

And as for your final point, 'Go nuts': they already tried that in the last film. Superman singlehandedly saves free-falling jumbo-jets, launches a space shuttle, deflects bullets with his eyeballs and lifts a fucking mountain of kryptonite out of the stratosphere. It was still a shit film. Superman is like any hero with super powers- he has the potential for some awesome setpieces, but that needs to be tempered with mature story telling.

It may surprise a lot of people to learn that originally Superman only had two powers- his incredible speed and strength. Everything else, including his flight and bulletproof skin, was added hodge-podge over the years. I personally wouldn't mind seeing the next film going right back to his roots, and re-introducing audiences to the Superman who doesn't just insta-win problems by flying them out into space.

Your reccomending Batman cock sucker Frank Millar AKA WhoresWhoresWhoresWhoresWhores as GOOD writing? DKR was a good story for it's time but it hasn't aged well, especially since Franky is fucking insane.

You want a GOOD superman story read All-Star Superman, though not All-Star Batman and Robin from Frank Millar, because the man is a hack.

 

[Aiddon_v1legacy]

Superman has probably been one of most difficult superheroes to transfer to film due to his absurd power. How exactly do you give a man who can juggle planets a challenge? I do think Nolan and company can come up with something compelling and Snyder is a talented director (even if Watchmen was doomed to be a colossal mess from the outset)

 

[Jaebird]

Am I the only one here who doesn't want to see Zod as the villain? I mean, as far as pitting Superman against another super-powered being, it seems a bit cheap to rely on someone who has the exact same power-set as Kal-El.

I would love to see any of the following villains in place of Zod:
Bizarro
Brainiac
Darkseid (he may not work as well for non-readers)
Doomsday (not a big fan, but much preferred over Zod)
Metallo
Mongul
Parasite

And, if Lex Luthor has to be in the film: DO NOT HAVE HIM BE AN IDIOT LAND BARON. That is NOT Lex Luthor. That is the lowest common denominator's lowest common denominator. Granted, Luthor in the comics probably wasn't the same then as he is today. But, the modern Luthor is such an effective bad-guy when compared to the Richard Donner Luthor.

(I'm well aware that no one from Hollywood is reading this.)

 

[bojac6]

I have to disagree with so much of this. Bring in some of the more ridiculous Superman villains? They SUCK! Nobody wants to see Toyman or Mxysptlyk or whatever his name is. Even the DCAU couldn't make Toyman a decent villain. And ignore Smallville? Umm, that show is pretty successful and a lot of people's primary source for Superman. That's like saying ignore Batman: The Animated Series for a Batman movie. I'm not saying you have to follow the show exactly (as Nolan didn't follow B:TAS) but I'm pretty sure Nolan watched some of it and knew the material.

Open the Fortress of Solitude with a building sized yellow key? Really? Because the way to make a good Superman movie is to make the Super Mario Bros. movie seem subtle and realistic by comparison. That's a good strategy.

I do like the thought of Independence Day, but with Superman. The movie should be something like that. Aliens, demons, whatever, invade and Superman goes nuts. I remember a comic where parademons or whatever were invading and Superman just cut loose. His heat vision weren't aimed rays, but wide arcs of death. He stopped punching and just flew at top speed through demons. It was awesome.

But making it a dumb comedy based on "oh he's strong, that's funny" like you suggest? I think that would never please anybody.

 

[Palindromemordnilap_v1legacy]

That's like saying ignore Batman: The Animated Series for a Batman movie

Last I looked all the live-action ones kind did ignore B: TAS

 

[Gunnyboy]

That's like saying ignore Batman: The Animated Series for a Batman movie

Last I looked all the live-action ones kind did ignore B: TAS

The tone and plot for Begins is due in large part to an episode in B:TAS

 

[MB202]

It's odd, people really like characters like Venom and maybe Doomsday, but you don't... But I can see why. Venom's basically an "evil version of Spider-man", and that's about it. Doomsday is strong enough to kill Superman... And that's about it.

I don't read the comics, so if there's more to them that I'm not getting, please tell me.

Also, I never watched Smallville, but I get the feeling it's like DC comics mixed with Dawson's Creek. And that doesn't sound too good.

 

[bojac6]

That's like saying ignore Batman: The Animated Series for a Batman movie

Last I looked all the live-action ones kind did ignore B: TAS

Well, they directly tie in with the Tim Burton movies and were made specifically with that in mind. The Animated Series invented the whole Mr. Freeze is trying to save/avenge his wife thing (that was done poorly in Batman and Robin) and that Two-Face was already obsessed with duality before the accident when he was just Harvey Dent (that was done brilliantly in The Dark Knight). We're ignoring the Schumacher films, because they are an example of how to make a bad movie, not a good one. Nolan's Batman films have the same feel as the series. As I said in my original post, he didn't follow the plot, but he really caught the appeal. Besides my earlier example of Two-Face, the portrayal of Bruce Wayne draws a lot from the show. He's willing to look the buffoon a lot, but nobody really mistakes him for idiot. The scene in the Dark Knight where he crashes his car is very similar to others in TAS. I have a hard time believing Nolan didn't watch some of the Animated Series.