Thus robbing the show of the one thing that might, someday, have made it cool.Onyx Oblivion said:I heard that Tom Welling isn't ever going to put on the costume. Something about his contract...
At WonderCon (last?) year I got Adam West to say aloud "Who the hell do you think I am? I'M THE GOD DAMN BATMAN!"Moriarty70 said:Dean Cain is Superman's Adam West. That's all that needs be said about the appeal of that show.The_root_of_all_evil said:AHEM!...Lex Luthor? Lionel Luthor? Two of the greatest evil guys since evil was invented. The Seto Kaiba's of Metropolis.Nobody Cares About Smallville
Apart from that it's toss, but it isn't The New Adventures of Lois and Clarke now, is it?
That's just BS. Sorry but it is. A lot of stories center around the people close to Clark trying to stop figuring out Supermans identity. I just don't buy it. It's like the breaking point where I'm no longer bothered to suspend my imaginationSpaceMedarotterX said:The thing is no one is looking for Supermans 'Secret Identity' because he gives them no reason to. He doesn't wear a mask, he acts completely normal. Lex Luthor isn't going "Who's Superman's secret identity" he just goes "That damn ALIEN!" because there is no mask!, John Stewert and Guy Gardner didn't wear masks as Green Lanterns, hell they went by there real names! Kyle Rayner wore a mask and everyone close to him (and far from him) figured it out. Superman is like John and Guy, he isn't giving them a mystery to solve so they don't care! He's not Spiderman who wears a full body suit to hide his identity.
No there WERE a lot of stories, in the silver age. In the Silver Age everything was stupid.Varya said:That's just BS. Sorry but it is. A lot of stories center around the people close to Clark trying to stop figuring out Supermans identity. I just don't buy it. It's like the breaking point where I'm no longer bothered to suspend my imaginationSpaceMedarotterX said:The thing is no one is looking for Supermans 'Secret Identity' because he gives them no reason to. He doesn't wear a mask, he acts completely normal. Lex Luthor isn't going "Who's Superman's secret identity" he just goes "That damn ALIEN!" because there is no mask!, John Stewert and Guy Gardner didn't wear masks as Green Lanterns, hell they went by there real names! Kyle Rayner wore a mask and everyone close to him (and far from him) figured it out. Superman is like John and Guy, he isn't giving them a mystery to solve so they don't care! He's not Spiderman who wears a full body suit to hide his identity.
Oh hell ya! Make this Superman movie with a threat that big and I can guarantee it won't fail. Maybe they should bring Brainiac into the picture... Maybe, but they might be reserving him for a Justice League movie.Think huge. Think Godzilla huge. Hell, think Roland Emmerich huge - remember Independence Day? 2012? Imagine that, but if Superman was there.
That's something that'd have people talking.
Admittedly, my contact with the comic is limited, I am talking about what I've seen from movies and DCAU, where it at least is touched upon several times.SpaceMedarotterX said:No there WERE a lot of stories, in the silver age. In the Silver Age everything was stupid.Varya said:That's just BS. Sorry but it is. A lot of stories center around the people close to Clark trying to stop figuring out Supermans identity. I just don't buy it. It's like the breaking point where I'm no longer bothered to suspend my imaginationSpaceMedarotterX said:The thing is no one is looking for Supermans 'Secret Identity' because he gives them no reason to. He doesn't wear a mask, he acts completely normal. Lex Luthor isn't going "Who's Superman's secret identity" he just goes "That damn ALIEN!" because there is no mask!, John Stewert and Guy Gardner didn't wear masks as Green Lanterns, hell they went by there real names! Kyle Rayner wore a mask and everyone close to him (and far from him) figured it out. Superman is like John and Guy, he isn't giving them a mystery to solve so they don't care! He's not Spiderman who wears a full body suit to hide his identity.
And way back then it was always something like 'super hypnotism' or something else, or using a body double to appear as Superman and Clark Kent at the same time. Although no if you can, show me a recent story where someones tried to find his real identity.
Well firstly the reason he doesn't have a mask is largely due to concept of a "grandfather clause", an exception that allows an old rule to continue to apply to some existing situations, when a new rule will apply to all future situations. Because Superman was created in the 30's, where there wasn't tv or internet, there were less risks with his identity. Because he's a classic we let it slide because it's part of his character, but if a new hero didn't wear a mask we'd have to write about them dealing with the consequences.Varya said:Admittedly, my contact with the comic is limited, I am talking about what I've seen from movies and DCAU, where it at least is touched upon several times.
However, even if what you say is true, I don't buy it. You mean to say that people just don't care that the guy working on a NEWSPAPER look a lot like the worlds greatest superhero? Simply never bringing up the fact isn't enough. Has all bad guys decided suddenly that you simply do not try to kill his family and friends anymore? Doesn't the tabloids and paparazzi care about shit like superheroes? Even a Superman-robot would be totally worthless. If I saw Clark next to Superman I would still wonder why the hell Supermans twin-brother doesn't have superpowers.
This is the first somewhat satisfying answer I've heard. Sure, there are plot-holes, but I still kinda buy it. This, however, doesn't translate very well on the big screen, since I can't see any actor who can pull of this.WolfThomas said:Well firstly the reason he doesn't have a mask is largely due to concept of a "grandfather clause", an exception that allows an old rule to continue to apply to some existing situations, when a new rule will apply to all future situations. Because Superman was created in the 30's, where there wasn't tv or internet, there were less risks with his identity. Because he's a classic we let it slide because it's part of his character, but if a new hero didn't wear a mask we'd have to write about them dealing with the consequences.Varya said:Admittedly, my contact with the comic is limited, I am talking about what I've seen from movies and DCAU, where it at least is touched upon several times.
However, even if what you say is true, I don't buy it. You mean to say that people just don't care that the guy working on a NEWSPAPER look a lot like the worlds greatest superhero? Simply never bringing up the fact isn't enough. Has all bad guys decided suddenly that you simply do not try to kill his family and friends anymore? Doesn't the tabloids and paparazzi care about shit like superheroes? Even a Superman-robot would be totally worthless. If I saw Clark next to Superman I would still wonder why the hell Supermans twin-brother doesn't have superpowers.
But it's touched on in Birthright, that Clark has a very generic face (but distintive blue eyes), however he also wears heavy prescription glasses (his eyesight immediately corrects for the thick lenses), as you might know from real life these tend distort the shape of the eyes. Anyone who tried to look through Clark's glasss would think he was nearly blind.
A big thing is how he acts and talks, he can see peoples reactions and facial expressions in slow motion and has amazing comprehension of sound. So modifying the way he acts and talks to be completely different is very easy. There are many talented actors in real life able to make you think they're two different people and Clark's possibly the best. In All Star Superman it's pretty amazing in that he's drawn identical in facial features when Clark and Superman but simply in posture, actions and expressions he looks completely different. Reading this comic you could believe they were too different people.
And honestly who would believe a god worked a day job?
Yeah getting an actor who both looks like him and can pull of the switch is very hard. Christopher Reeves was quite good at this despite the ridiculousness (and poor quality) of his movies.Varya said:This is the first somewhat satisfying answer I've heard. Sure, there are plot-holes, but I still kinda buy it. This, however, doesn't translate very well on the big screen, since I can't see any actor who can pull of this.