Yeah, it's a nice gesture, but it's a little late for that. And seriously, homosexuality was a crime back then? That's just wrong...
Yes, most English ex-colonies only really decriminalised homosexuality in the last 40 years. I think it was decriminalised in my country, New Zealand, in 1986. With no small amount of opposition as well, of course.CrazyGirl17 said:Yeah, it's a nice gesture, but it's a little late for that. And seriously, homosexuality was a crime back then? That's just wrong...
And it wasn't stupid and horrible for the thousands of others found guilty and punished for gross indecency?Objectable said:...I think it has to do more that he was arrested for a really, really stupid and horrible law.Zacharious-khan said:This shouldn't have happened, plain and simple.
I find it insulting, just because Turing was a large help in the war he alone gets a pardon? It's like saying "It's a good thing you were so smart, because if you weren't prosecuting you for being homosexual is still ok" I find this detestable.
Turing was special but not in this way, he was just one of the thousands who were given the choice of chemical castration or jail and not a one of them was guilty.
Thanks, that's what I thought...Bujiraso said:I retweeted this on twitter, I will say it here
It's not ok to be gay because someone's a genius.
It's just ok to be gay.
They should pardon EVERYONE or no one. And it should be obvious which is the right thing to do.
Hey, to be fair, in the category of "Modern people apologizing for terrible moral crimes in the past" this case is actually pretty speedy. I mean, the Catholic Church convicted Galileo of heresy in 1633, and it took them until 1992 to finally pardon him on those charges and basically do the religious equivalent of "My bad, dawg."Ignatz_Zwakh said:Huh, that's only 61 years late.
UNHchabo said:Absolutely wrong. He was one of the primary unsung heroes of World War II, and a major reason why the field of computer science is the way it is today. Without him, we might be decades behind where we are. Given the work he did for his country, his conviction was a travesty, and I'm glad to see him pardoned, even if the many others convicted under the statute likely won't get the same.BigTuk said:Yeah, at this point I think it must have been a slow news day for this to make news. I mean it's been over 40 years since homosexuality was a crime in britain. I think this is less a sincere amends and more just someone trying to get their name in a news article by mentioning someone famous.
Also, the Queen is just trying to get her name in the news? Really?
She's always doing stuff like this for attention. She even put herself on stamps!UNHchabo said:Also, the Queen is just trying to get her name in the news? Really?