I would hope that you would also say "perhaps I should do more research into the other claims I gave as well".FFHAuthor said:Well, the bulk of my information has come from Stichin so I can only say, interesting, I stand corrected.
I would hope that you would also say "perhaps I should do more research into the other claims I gave as well".FFHAuthor said:Well, the bulk of my information has come from Stichin so I can only say, interesting, I stand corrected.
Actually BrassButtons, the entire point of my arguments in this thread is that I actually do keep asking questions, not that I've stopped. Perhaps you would do well to remember that individuals who hold different beliefs than you aren't fools, they have simply learned different things. You might find the people you provide information to more willing to listen to you on other topics.BrassButtons said:I would hope that you would also say "perhaps I should do more research into the other claims I gave as well".FFHAuthor said:Well, the bulk of my information has come from Stichin so I can only say, interesting, I stand corrected.
You didn't know that a very basic claim you were making was wrong. I'm not saying you haven't been asking question, I'm saying you haven't done basic research. Which you clearly haven't, or you wouldn't have said that Djoser and Snefru came after Khufru.FFHAuthor said:Actually BrassButtons, the entire point of my arguments in this thread is that I actually do keep asking questions, not that I've stopped.
I haven't called you a fool. Wrong, yes. Fool, no.Perhaps you would do well to remember that individuals who hold different beliefs than you aren't fools, they have simply learned different things.
Of course.BrassButtons said:I haven't called you a fool. Wrong, yes. Fool, no.
I'm surprised you put such a low value upon curiosity.Dinwatr said:"Asking questions" IS WORTHLESS. Only by diligently pursuing the answers do we learn anything. Questions are limitless--after all, I can ask "Are demons shaking the atoms in my coffee to keep it hot?" After all, I'm keeping asking questions! Science and a rational epistemology is about ANSWERS, because only by answers do we move anything forward, even something as simple as a conversation. Tentative answers to be sure, and always open to revision, but answers none the less.
"Asking questions" is nothing more than pretending ignorance for the sake of pretending ignorance. It's ignoring the fact that there's doubt that's not reasonable.
He's not putting a low value on curiosity. He's putting a low value on curiosity that ignores data. And there's a good reason for this--if we treat all questions as equally worthwhile, then we'll never get anything done. Moreover, he's saying that even good questions are useless if you don't look for the answer, which you clearly aren't doing (again, you would have known the timeline of the pharaohs if you had actually researched the claim about who built which pyramid).FFHAuthor said:I'm surprised you put such a low value upon curiosity.
Could have made for a great film. Just not *that* film.the Dept of Science said:As impressive as the pyramids and Nazca lines are, you would have thought that if there were beings capable of interestellar travel we would have something a bit more impressive than simply large ancient structures. Some technology that isn't made out of rocks, for example.
Yea, like the most recent Indiana Jones movie...Nouw said:I think that it's ridiculous but can make for a great film.
Why? You've got an opportunity to learn more about a very interesting subject, from people you consider to be "intelligent and knowledgeable".FFHAuthor said:You know what, I'm just going to stop.
You succeeded. I did ask a few questions. I just went a step further, and researched the answers.I had been hopeful of bringing up enough to make some people ask a few questions
And that's exactly what you've gotten, at least from me (won't speak for anybody else, but I think they've been open and honest as well).and perhaps receive something akin to an honest and open response to them from what appears to be three knowledgeable individuals
Did anyone actually call you a fool, or suggest that you're stupid for being wrong? I certainly didn't.You're a fool, here's why. Which I can accept, since I'm incredibly willing to hear information and learn. But sadly that need always be tinted with 'I'm right you're completely wrong and stupid for believing that'.
Again, who has said this?-I know far more than you, so why would you believe something so foolish. Which tends to be what is known as credentialism, and tends to be a fancy way of ignoring things that you don't have answers to.
If you're talking about Dinwatr, he has not insulted you. He's strongly disagreed with your point of view, but that's not an insult. After all, we're talking about someone who's scientific field had to make a rule against dynamiting each other's dig sites--when a paleontologist insults you, you'll know it-And an insult of human curiosity, from someone whose profession is based entirely upon it.
You don't appear all that willing, though. You're response to being told that you're wrong about several things, and thus probably about others as well, is to be insulted and abandon the thread. That suggests that you wanted us to agree with you, not that you wanted to learn.Respond as you like to what I believe, and be shocked that I'm willing to actually learn and admit to being misinformed.
CODE-D said:I tried watching ancient aliens but every time I do my brain threatens an aneurysm from the sheer stupidity of the "evidence" which are usually this thing resembles spacecraft/suit or we dont know how this was built so aliens of course.