The thing is that my assumptions are based on what's actually there. Hence, reasonable. Yours are based upon stretches of logic. The only people whose positions were actually changed were the ones near the ammo bag. Vasquez, Drake, and Apone were all where they were supposed to be within the formation. Hell, you barely see any of them moving at any point at all from the start of the engagement until the retreat. Note that they aren't in a tight formation. As they enter the hive Apone even tells them not to bunch up. They were spread thin, and it was by design.Zykon TheLich said:Yeah, again: "reasonable to assume". It's also reasonable to assume they might have been in different positions without the exploding ammo bag. Are you saying they couldn't have seen the alien? Because I say, yes, they could have. More eyes cover more angles. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong, just that saying "this is what is most likely to happen" based on an incomplete knowledge of completely fictional events is just your interpretation, not the right one. It's not "wrong" but it's not the definitive answer.
Neither interpretation may be "right." But at least mine is based on evidence given.
Anyone who understands the concept of a tactical withdrawal? If there were more of them he would have actually needed to be in that position longer in order to cover everyone's exit. In effect it even makes sense that of the surviving Marines it would be either him or Vasquez to do this, since in real life light machine gun operators typically do use their weapons more to suppress targets than directly killing them (though they obviously will, if given opportunity).Again, whose to say he would have been standing there had there been more of them?
We cover them for the vast majority of the scene. Even when it cuts away to inside the APC, the audio from the helmet cameras is constantly playing in the background. Get a decent sound system and crank up your volume enough and you can hear the whole battle. The only times you can't are during the exterior shots of the APC. So to make your assumption work, you would need to assume that the Marines, who aren't doing so well as it is, somehow manage to rack up massive kill counts during a couple brief windows of a few seconds each. Once again, a huge leap in logic that's seriously stretching what we're given.Maybe, but we didn't follow the marines the whole time did we?
Oh, I get the point. You're the one that keeps dragging this out. I've presented this from the start as opinion and theory. I've on multiple occasions said that it's based upon reasonable assumption based on evidence given in the film (you even directly quoted it and addressed it!). You challenge my theory, I defend it. You stretch logic massively to continue trying to challenge it, I point out why it doesn't fit. At no point, in any of my posts, did I say that I had a definitive answer other than within my own theory. It's not my fault if you've misinterpreted that.Look, really my point here is not specifically about aliens, it's about speculating on what would have happened or what did happen in a work of fiction is not going to come up with a definite or even most "likely answer", unless it's a very simple cause and effect. It's hard enough in reality, but in fiction we have even less to go on a lot of the time because not only do we not have all the info, the info doesn't actually exist because it wasn't important to the plot. Discussing what might have happened, yes, saying "this is what would have happened", eh, no.
Change something like "what if they were still armed" and suddenly Frost may not explode, that means W&C might not die, the sqaud don't have to duck and cover from the explosions so maybe their positioning is different...I'm sure you can come up with a way to say "actually I think it's more likely that..." and I can come up with a way to say "actually no, I think it's perfectly possible and just as likely".
I base my theory on three key things: What's in the movie (what we actually see and hear) first and foremost, information that James Cameron himself has called canonical (like the Aliens: Colonial Marines Technical Manual, which I've read, which covers pretty much everything relating to the Colonial Marines including weapons, combat formations, and tactics - if you like the Colonial Marines it's a fascinating book), and actual military experiences (my husband was an M249 SAW operator in the real-life Marines). So I try my best not to stretch logic unrealistically in order to get any particular outcome (it's why early on I even identified Wierzbowski and Crowe as the wild cards in the scenario, since those two are pretty much the only real unknown variable).
As for Frost... dude was dead. There's no "what if." Dietrich pointed her weapon directly at him, at close range, and opened fire. Regardless of whether or not he was being hit by jellied napalm (note: he didn't actually explode) or 10mm explosive-tipped ammunition, he was dead. And she wouldn't have had a Pulse Rifle anyway. She was armed with the M240 at every single point in the movie. So yeah... Frost doesn't get to stay frosty.
You were playing devil's advocate, and I can respect that much, to try and get me to stop speculating about a topic that I'm (hopefully clearly) very interested in. The thing is though... frankly, if you don't want people to try to defend their positions and just immediately give up, perhaps think first before challenging them? I mean seriously... forum use 101.