Amazing games that absolutely SHOULDN'T get/have got sequels
- Thread starter Griffolion
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Mass effect 1. loved that game, the second one took away almost everything i liked about the first one.
Halo reach. ended the series on a high note. but of course zee cash cowzz muzzent go un milkt. it will be the post-CoD 4 thing all over again i can see it now.
Halo reach. ended the series on a high note. but of course zee cash cowzz muzzent go un milkt. it will be the post-CoD 4 thing all over again i can see it now.
The Final Fantasies. I have yet to see a good sequel to any of them, the beginning of the end started with X-2, which made all the drama in the original moot. No Final Fantasy should have a sequel. That is all.
well for me it's portal 2, even though it is a sequel, it was a great sequel and it finnished everything nicely. All the plot lines were tied up, and (in my opinion) there is little area for valve to make a sequel without it being about a completely different person.
Planescape: Torment
However, I think another game in the Planescape setting would be a great idea with maybe mentioning the Nameless One. But there really shouldn't be another game focused on him.
However, I think another game in the Planescape setting would be a great idea with maybe mentioning the Nameless One. But there really shouldn't be another game focused on him.
Modern Warfare 2 is getting a third, that counts.
MW2 wasn't terrible, just average to the extreme. MW3 is just going to be shit. A multimillion-making shit.
MW2 wasn't terrible, just average to the extreme. MW3 is just going to be shit. A multimillion-making shit.
My top two for this are Force Unleashed and the Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction. TFU 2 had a terrible idea for a storyline, and was not helped at all by its pathetic length, and Mercs 2 just took all the wonderful freedom you had in the first and chopped it at the knees.
Dragon Age: Origins. Above-average Bioware RPG goodness, followed by this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMcVZQI6ybw].
Hmmmmm, interesting question. For me there should have been no more Final Fantasy games after 6, with maybe tactics being the exception.
Front Mission should have ended after the first game. None of the sequels really gave me that same feeling as the original(and evolved is just an atrocity).
Knights of the Old Republic. The second one isn't terrible, but it's not nearly as good as the first.
Front Mission should have ended after the first game. None of the sequels really gave me that same feeling as the original(and evolved is just an atrocity).
Knights of the Old Republic. The second one isn't terrible, but it's not nearly as good as the first.
The Silent Hill series should've stopped at "The Room". Downpour would be better off being retooled as it's own independant story.
How was 3 worse than 2? Obviously it wasn't everything it could've been, with the whole kingship thing being a massive disappointment, but the environments were much more varied, and the storyline more involved, the whole thing felt detailed, whereas Fable 2 just felt rushed out, buggy and (for me at least) laggy. I got the feeling that it was just a test for the 'dog mechanics' (if you will).Zing said:
Then again that's my opinion and, as you said, really there shouldn't have been any sequels :/
Now if only they would rerelease it.Pedro The Hutt said:
It's a ways off to say "Beyond Good & Evil" yet.
Battlefield: Bad Company. If we could have Fable III without 1 and 2, that would be nice.
