The only advantage is being able to get approximate measurements without a measuring device. Using cups for cups and feet for feet. Otherwise I think it just makes us Americans look a little backwards.
Well, first of all, I don't care about SCIENCE, but I do agree with your other points. The metric system is much easier to use and makes more sense, but I grew up with the imperial system and I can easily eyeball all of the units. Since the imperial system is still far more widely used here, I will continue to use it as it is just easier for me personally at this point in time.Amaror said:First of all. I know this i probably going to be a pretty difficult discussion. Everyone here has grown up with one or the other measurement system, so nobody can be really objective about this.
Ok, then let's get this started. I read up a bit on the Imperial System and i just can't find any great benefits to it.
Let's start with the obvious advantage of the metric system, as that it is not only the international standard, but also the System of SCIENCE (Which kinda is an instant win right there).
It's easy to calculate with and is just perfect for Mathmatics, Physics and so on.
I heard from some people that the imperial system is easier to use in day to day life, but i can't see why.
It's obviously better in day to day life, if you have grown up with it and used it your entire life.
But if we look at both systems and how we would use them in day to day life, i still think the metric system to be far superiour.
First of all, you just have to learn 3 units of measurement. Meter, gramm and litre. Any larger or smaller units you might need, you just use the appropriate word before it. kilo for a thousand, mega for a million and so on.
In the imperial system you got yards, feet, miles, pinch, pounds, tons and so on, and so on.
It's just way more to memorize, for practically no benefit in day to day life.
Oooooo! Are you on local TV. You must be, like, a celebrity or something!Atmos Duality said:Apart from a couple of handy conversions, there's not much that's all that great.
As a meteorologist, (mostly Celsius, though it's not like it's hard to convert between the two since they have the same degree ratio)
All of them are arbitrary, but the point of difference is what you do with it and how using them helps you.drthmik said:Really it's all arbitrary anyway!
a Meter is just a length of a rod based on some BS reason, same as a foot or a yard
Truth is we couldn't care less what stick you use to measure with
both work equally well and do a fine job of measuring things
so here's the REAL question;
Why do you Europeans get so bent out of shape that we Americans don't use your arbitrary definitions of measurement?
Well, speaking as an American I can see why it would make more sense for a system to be based off of multiples of ten rather than having a different amount of numbers needed to make it to the next tier of measurment.drthmik said:Really it's all arbitrary anyway!
a Meter is just a length of a rod based on some BS reason, same as a foot or a yard
Truth is we couldn't care less what stick you use to measure with
both work equally well and do a fine job of measuring things
so here's the REAL question;
Why do you Europeans get so bent out of shape that we Americans don't use your arbitrary definitions of measurement?
Edit: I'd also like to point out that by simply doing nothing we can piss off millions of people and that amuses us to no end! XD
This guy put my point across a lot more clearly.hermes200 said:All of them are arbitrary, but the point of difference is what you do with it and how using them helps you.drthmik said:Really it's all arbitrary anyway!
a Meter is just a length of a rod based on some BS reason, same as a foot or a yard
Truth is we couldn't care less what stick you use to measure with
both work equally well and do a fine job of measuring things
so here's the REAL question;
Why do you Europeans get so bent out of shape that we Americans don't use your arbitrary definitions of measurement?
For every measure in the metric system, to express it in the immediately next unit you only have to multiply or divide it by ten, always. Just move the decimal point... simple. For the imperial system, if you want to express a distance to the next scale, you have to multiply it by 1/12 (inches to feet), 1/3 (feet to yards), 1/220 (yards to stadia) or 1/1760 (yards to miles)
Hahah, I'm in almost exactly the same boat. Whenever US friends ask me how much I weigh they are utterly confused when I answer in stones, and they constantly take the piss by asking for weight measurements in sticks, stones and hay. The bar stewardsOneCatch said:A Metric Tonne is!Caiphus said:Also, is ton not a Metric measurement?
The older Long and Short Tons are not.
Short Tons are what is generally meant when Imperial users say ton, Metric Tonnes are common elsewhere and equal to 1000kg. No-one uses Long Tons any more.
OT; I'm British, meaning that I use metric for everything except measures of alcohol (pint), distance (in miles, when driving) and the weight of people (stone).
Measures of other liquids are metric, as are distances when not driving, and the weight of anything else. And yes, I'm aware it's utterly ridiculous.
Quite simply it is good for practical things when building. Wood Frames are 16" center to center, even in places with metric, it's not a number that works out nicely, and quite simply it saves time. Tiles are done in sq feet aswell due to there size.Amaror said:Ok, then let's get this started. I read up a bit on the Imperial System and i just can't find any great benefits to it.
What are you talking about?direkiller said:Also how often do you have to convert? that is all I hear people say when it comes to metric, and i almost never see it even in science, they still want it in base units.
How often do i have to convert? I am not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean how often i have to convert the metric system into other system? Because the answer to that is never. I don't see why i ever should. I am living in germany. We completely have the metric system here. I don't even thing we ever had the imperial system, since it's the system of the old british empire, which germany most certainly wasn't a part of.direkiller said:Quite simply it is good for practical things when building. Wood Frames are 16" center to center, even in places with metric, it's not a number that works out nicely, and quite simply it saves time. Tiles are done in sq feet aswell due to there size.Amaror said:Ok, then let's get this started. I read up a bit on the Imperial System and i just can't find any great benefits to it.
Also how often do you have to convert? that is all I hear people say when it comes to metric, and i almost never see it even in science, they still want it in base units. So with that the strength of metric is out the window and it just comes down to what numbers you remember more, and quite frankly the imperial numbers are just easier when wood and steel are involved.
Your question doesn't make sense. Minutes and hours aren't SI units, only seconds are. Hours, minutes and days are non-SI units based on the second and the rotational period of the earth used purely for timekeeping.MinionJoe said:So answer me this: Using the metric system, how many minutes are in an hour?
Eh... stone is a UK imperial measurement with nothing to do with SI units. I think your anger might be misplaced.dylanmc12 said:Over my education, I've used both the metric and imperial systems.
I hate them both, I hate maths, I hate anything that involves my arithmatic or mathematical initiative, and I hate how 14 is a "stone". Why a stone? I'll tell you why: 150 lbs. What will you compare it to? Is it good? But 16 stone? No, it's just calling you fat now.
So basically, I hate the metric system for calling me fat. But I use it more, so I guess I preffer it.