Well, it's true, so I don't really see a problem with her saying it. We're not really going to be part of society, so this kind of discrimination is something we just have to live with.
I think she'd prefer you didn't have to live with it.SushiJaguar said:Well, it's true, so I don't really see a problem with her saying it. We're not really going to be part of society, so this kind of discrimination is something we just have to live with.
Tenkage said:Thank you, you are a nice human.Andrew Giarrusso said:As someone with Aspergers, I say, "I hope the birthing does well, and may they be happy with a fun loving family ^_^"SadisticFire said:Of course it comes off disgusting. We have morals of 'the right to live'. Without natural selection we're progressively making our gene pool worse and worse, because we never let anyone die with science and medicine. That also goes for the fact we keep treating minor diseases with AB's so we're forcing them to become drug resistant. I'm not saying you don't deserve to have kids, but it's better for the humans as a species. Life isn't fair, some people are rolled unlucky lives. All I can say if you want to have kids, but have a genetic disability is to adopt. There's thousands and thousands of kids suffering with no parent. No one to care for them. Adopt them, show love to them. They're suffering, and compared to making other people suffer with giving birth to someone with a disability, adopting is so much better.scorptatious said:So, because I have autism, I'm not allowed to have kids?
I'm sorry but FUCK THAT.
I'm not saying I will be a father someday, nor do I want to be one anytime soon. And I can kinda agree in the sense that if a person is unable to care for themselves, it might not be a good idea for them to have kids.
But saying that people like me should be prevented from breeding just because we may "taint the gene pool" as you say, it sorta comes off as disgusting.
Have a pleasant day mein fuhrer.
And now, mods, you are free to punish me.
POST SCRIPT: Also due note, that many people diagnosed with autism/ADHD/many other disabilities actually do not have them. Our current society(Atleast in America. Yay America) has a HUGE habbit of over diagnoses. In America 80% of males are diagnosed with ADHD, but only ten percent of them actually have it.(I don't actually have a citation to it. It was a factoid that I remember in one of my classes)
As a person with asperger's, I have decided to have 4 children purely in spite of you.Master of the Skies said:snip
Thinking like this lead to the extermination of all severely disabled people by Hitler.Kanova said:Everyone is saying that there is absolutely no way to control the kid, he just has to do it. Does it go away ever? Do you have to take care of him until you die? Will he scream and howl until he dies? I would vote in favor of euthanasia. Easier on everyone.
This post starts off strong and gets better.Sleekit said:ye lets vote for state sanctioned euthanasia.
no potential problems with that...
lets give a g-man with a clipboard the power over live and death.
its not like 60% of the US is officially mentally ill or something crazy like that...
let's kick that door right open.
with any luck maybe we'll save at least sixty thousand reichsmarks per person.
![]()
captcha says "watch c-beams glitter" [small]holy shit...[/small]
Andrew Giarrusso said:^_^ I try to be, I try to beTenkage said:Thank you, you are a nice human.Andrew Giarrusso said:As someone with Aspergers, I say, "I hope the birthing does well, and may they be happy with a fun loving family ^_^"SadisticFire said:Of course it comes off disgusting. We have morals of 'the right to live'. Without natural selection we're progressively making our gene pool worse and worse, because we never let anyone die with science and medicine. That also goes for the fact we keep treating minor diseases with AB's so we're forcing them to become drug resistant. I'm not saying you don't deserve to have kids, but it's better for the humans as a species. Life isn't fair, some people are rolled unlucky lives. All I can say if you want to have kids, but have a genetic disability is to adopt. There's thousands and thousands of kids suffering with no parent. No one to care for them. Adopt them, show love to them. They're suffering, and compared to making other people suffer with giving birth to someone with a disability, adopting is so much better.scorptatious said:So, because I have autism, I'm not allowed to have kids?
I'm sorry but FUCK THAT.
I'm not saying I will be a father someday, nor do I want to be one anytime soon. And I can kinda agree in the sense that if a person is unable to care for themselves, it might not be a good idea for them to have kids.
But saying that people like me should be prevented from breeding just because we may "taint the gene pool" as you say, it sorta comes off as disgusting.
Have a pleasant day mein fuhrer.
And now, mods, you are free to punish me.
POST SCRIPT: Also due note, that many people diagnosed with autism/ADHD/many other disabilities actually do not have them. Our current society(Atleast in America. Yay America) has a HUGE habbit of over diagnoses. In America 80% of males are diagnosed with ADHD, but only ten percent of them actually have it.(I don't actually have a citation to it. It was a factoid that I remember in one of my classes)
As a person with asperger's, I have decided to have 4 children purely in spite of you.Master of the Skies said:snip
You'd think that guns in Call of Duty taking .1 seconds longer to reload wouldn't result in legions of fans telling the guy responsible to kill himself either.KevinHe92 said:I'm going to play the devil's advocate and wonder why nobody has called out the authenticity of this now viral letter? I dunno, I just felt like it was TOO crazy and hostile to possibly be real. But I don't know. People can be crazy.
That's sort of what I was thinking... After reading the letter, I highly doubt that any adult (a mother even) could write something like that. It looks extremely juvenile and my first thought was that some neighbourhood kid/s put that up.KevinHe92 said:I'm going to play the devil's advocate and wonder why nobody has called out the authenticity of this now viral letter? I dunno, I just felt like it was TOO crazy and hostile to possibly be real. But I don't know. People can be crazy.
Er...given the amount of people just in this thread supporting the writer, doesn't seem outlandish at all.KevinHe92 said:I'm going to play the devil's advocate and wonder why nobody has called out the authenticity of this now viral letter? I dunno, I just felt like it was TOO crazy and hostile to possibly be real. But I don't know. People can be crazy.
Woah there. I don't see a whole lot of people around here supporting the writer. In fact, I see none. What I do see are people sympathetic to the writer. There's a big difference. In my apartment, I'm a couple doors down from a family with a boy with severe autism. Do I understand what would compel somebody to feel the way this person does? Absolutely. Do I support her acting upon those feelings in the way she did? Don't be stupid.thaluikhain said:Er...given the amount of people just in this thread supporting the writer, doesn't seem outlandish at all.
I dunno. Google "Crazy Rhubarb Lady". Never underestimate the human capacity for "crazy and hostile".KevinHe92 said:I'm going to play the devil's advocate and wonder why nobody has called out the authenticity of this now viral letter? I dunno, I just felt like it was TOO crazy and hostile to possibly be real.
Because you made a sweeping generalization about euthanasia being "inherently wrong" and "twisted", without regard to the many situations in which it is perfectly reasonable. You certainly didn't state it as an opinion, you stated it as if it was fact, as if anyone considering it was wrong or twisted somehow.HoneyVision said:All I did was state my opinion, so I'm interested as to how your reached the conclusion that I'm "selfish". Calm down.Avaholic03 said:Even in the case of avoiding terminal pain or agony? That's a very selfish attitude. My sister worked in hospice, and on more than a few occasions, family unnecessarily prolonged someone's suffering because they selfishly couldn't let go. Euthanasia is, in many cases, the far more humane option.HoneyVision said:Euthanasia is just inherently wrong. The very idea of it is just twisted.
EDIT: whether or not that applies to this story, I really can't say. As usual, sensationalist media reporting doesn't really give an accurate portrayal of the situation.
Ain't that the truth!oZode said:Everyone's autistic nowadays.
Just the fact I have been diagnosed despite me doing perfectly fine in school and even having a couple friends since elementary amazes me.
Yeah, I know I'd be annoyed at the situation. But extremely hateful death threats (death wishes, whatever) are about as much of an appropriate response as a nuclear strike to counter two people robbing a corner store.Queen Michael said:That kind of letter is not okay. Sure, I understand that she's been dealing with the noise for a while now, and once you snap you've got a lot of anger that's been bottled up, but there are some things you just don't say to someone.
Sorry if what I'm about to say now is a tad controversial, but to be honest I actually sympathize with the author of the letter to a large degree. The fact that the kid can't help having autism doesn't do anything to make the noise less annoying to hear, and if having the kid there is so annoying to the neighbors then that needs to be taken into account. But once a woman writes something like this, I lose all sympathy for her.