No, I don't expect you to buy it, because that would imply that you spent something- the download on the website's free, I was making joke about how you couldn't spend too much on it because it's free...EverythingIncredible said:You expect me to buy a game
The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.
Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.
I bet it would originally be a mutual breakup but they George Lucas would edit it so that Hisao breaks up first.ChupathingyX said:I'd hate to imagine what the bad ending would be like.
Huh, I didn't realize one was REQUIRED to have children when they start dating someone... So yeah, I guess that's a good reason to deny disabled persons any sort of love in their life and it's a TOTALLY legitimate reason as to why you shouldn't play this visual novel. /sarcasmEverythingIncredible said:Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.
now this is highly disturbing.EverythingIncredible said:Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.
Huh, didn't know people were still into eugenics.EverythingIncredible said:Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.Truth Cake said:No, I don't expect you to buy it, because that would imply that you spent something- the download on the website's free, I was making joke about how you couldn't spend too much on it because it's free...EverythingIncredible said:You expect me to buy a game
The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.
Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.
And frankly, I'm worried that you apparantly think that it's wrong for normal people to find love in a disabled person just BECAUSE they're disabled and on no other criteria... so please, explain to me how dating a disabled person is 'wrong' to you, because apparantly I don't understand.
Well, certainly not because you care about them and actaully enjoy their company as more than just friends- no, children are the ONLY reason to pursue a romantic relationship with someone at all.EverythingIncredible said:Why would you date if you aren't going to have children?
And ever heard of a carrier? Just because their immediate children don't have it doesn't mean that their kids won't either?
And apparently believe there's a genetic cause for things like house fires and car accidents...Daystar Clarion said:Huh, didn't know people were still into eugenics.EverythingIncredible said:Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.Truth Cake said:No, I don't expect you to buy it, because that would imply that you spent something- the download on the website's free, I was making joke about how you couldn't spend too much on it because it's free...EverythingIncredible said:You expect me to buy a game
The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.
Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.
And frankly, I'm worried that you apparantly think that it's wrong for normal people to find love in a disabled person just BECAUSE they're disabled and on no other criteria... so please, explain to me how dating a disabled person is 'wrong' to you, because apparantly I don't understand.
Yeah, because actually caring for someone for reasons outside of conceiving offspring and reproduction and liking them as a person and NOT just a child-producing partner or whatever is just... inconceivable, isn't it? I didn't realize humans HAD to be so robotic and logical and have no form of emotional attachment whatsoever.EverythingIncredible said:Yes...that's what romance is for...
It's to find someone whose traits are desirable enough by your standards to reproduce with.
That's how humanity works. Why else would I keep myself out of dating?
I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?EverythingIncredible said:Yes...that's what romance is for...Truth Cake said:Well, certainly not because you care about them and actaully enjoy their company as more than just friends- no, children are the ONLY reason to pursue a romantic relationship with someone at all.EverythingIncredible said:Why would you date if you aren't going to have children?
And ever heard of a carrier? Just because their immediate children don't have it doesn't mean that their kids won't either?
It's to find someone whose traits are desirable enough by your standards to reproduce with.
That's how humanity works. Why else would I keep myself out of dating?
Maybe there's a genetic predisposition of inflammability?RhombusHatesYou said:And apparently believe there's a genetic cause for things like house fires and car accidents...Daystar Clarion said:Huh, didn't know people were still into eugenics.EverythingIncredible said:Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.Truth Cake said:No, I don't expect you to buy it, because that would imply that you spent something- the download on the website's free, I was making joke about how you couldn't spend too much on it because it's free...EverythingIncredible said:You expect me to buy a game
The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.
Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.
And frankly, I'm worried that you apparantly think that it's wrong for normal people to find love in a disabled person just BECAUSE they're disabled and on no other criteria... so please, explain to me how dating a disabled person is 'wrong' to you, because apparantly I don't understand.
You expect me to buy a gameEverythingIncredible said:Ah, clever! You judge the game's content without even having played it to see the actual content of the game for yourself (although I suppose the word 'game' is a pretty poor category to put it under, it's a visual novel...)Truth Cake said:h to not only make a game out of it, but to localize it too...
Most people would call that 'prejudice' or something of the like, some others might call it 'efficiency'! I'm in the former group, of course. You should really actually play it- it's not like you're going to spend too much money on it
OT: Hilarious, although even if they made a Vader arc just for giggles, I don't think I'd go for it...
Wait a second... Darth Vader, an obviously male character, in a female schoolgirl outfit? IT'S A TRAP! *crowd boos*
Pffft bwahaha is it wrong I read that in the voice of Vader while imagining him blushing and biting his thumb!?Mathak said:I'm guessing she'd be Tsundere.Irradiated Tiger said:Well that was...unexpected.
What personality would Vader-chan have anyway?
'S-stupid r-rebels...it's not like I'm blowing your p-planet up b-because I l-like you or anything!'
Are you honestly telling me that if you are unlucky enough for some asshole drunk driver to plow into your car and for your injuries to lead to amputation that it was your fault for not having good genetics? Or if on a morning commute your train got derailed and a similar situation occurred it would be your genetics fault?EverythingIncredible said:Of course?BeastofShadow said:I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?
If they were desirable enough genetically then that wouldn't have happened to them in the first place.
Damn train derailment gene. Should've been bred out a long time ago. How did we even develop it before trains even existed? Explain that, evolutionists!BeastofShadow said:Are you honestly telling me that if you are unlucky enough for some asshole drunk driver to plow into your car and for your injuries to lead to amputation that it was your fault for not having good genetics? Or if on a morning commute your train got derailed and a similar situation occurred it would be your genetics fault?EverythingIncredible said:Of course?BeastofShadow said:I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?
If they were desirable enough genetically then that wouldn't have happened to them in the first place.