I feel like whichever member ended up writing this was... self elected, to say the least. While I've been around proclaimed Anons (physically, during Scientology protests. Not bad people), I can't begin to explain their structure, seeing as how they purportedly have none.
Regardless of the... I'm sorry but- abysmal message, the general Anon tactic of swiping information was rather intriguing. I'm not sure what can be done with it, exactly, but... hmm...
Still, I guess I would rather Anon had some form of preventing retaliation before doing something quite like this. Or at least, had someone writ e a better note. What about the person who wrote the anti-Scientology videos? Not pulitzer winning, but effective, and rather chilling in the write context.
This was not what I felt to be a really strong effort by the group that was able to so thoroughly shame HB Gary, fluster the Cha-church of $cientology, and help put a few criminals behind bars, to top it off. However, how strong of an effort could Anon do, and would it be "too much"? As it stands, I don't think this will be enough to worry about, but also not enough to do much.