Anti-DRM Group Sends Nintendo 200 Bricks

Recommended Videos

FrancoDHorse

New member
Mar 9, 2010
22
0
0
Cheesus333 said:
totally heterosexual said:
So wait what are they supposed to do with the bricks?

They could temporarily brick it, if you like, and then the only way to reverse this is to take it into an appropriate shop or outlet and have it fixed, more or less proving foul play (but giving you a chance to defend yourself if you are innocent) so Nintendo can deal with it as appropriate.
I actually like that idea. Say you go to Nintendo World and ask to go to the back room and ask nicely to unbrick your system... for a price, obviously. And then you can go on your merry way and buy the game you tried to pirate (you are in Nintendo World so why not do it then)
 

Low Key

New member
May 7, 2009
2,503
0
0
Everything about electronics today pisses me off. No, you fuckers don't have the right to know where I am, what sites I go on the most, or whether or not to brick my device. Fuck you, go to hell. If I want to sand off Nintendo and paint Microsoft onto it, that's what I'm gonna do. If I want to create my own firmware, that's what I'm gonna do. Eat shit Nintendo.

This is exactly why it took me so long to buy a smartphone. Then I found Cyanogen and rooted my phone to install it over Android. Go ahead and call me paranoid, but I know the shit that happened to PSN as well as many other services from other companies will not only continue, but increase as we become more technologically advanced. No one is gonna be stealing info about me, that's for sure.

Watch and learn
 

Aggieknight

New member
Dec 6, 2009
229
0
0
Odlus said:
Along with Nintendo owning rights to video or pictures captured with the device
This part bothers me far more than the device being intentionally bricked for TOS breaking modifications.
Me 2.

I'm sure people would be sharpening their pitchforks if Apple's newest ToS said that they owned all the pictures you took on your iPhone. WTH Big N?

Personally, I'm not concerned about the Bricking ToS. There is no way that it can stand up in court. The Supreme court decided two decades ago that what a consumer does with their product after they purchase it is up to them. Nothing prevents Big N from threatening to do the bricking, however...
 

Haro

New member
May 27, 2009
43
0
0
SirBryghtside said:
EVERYONE is overreacting about this.

That's all I'm saying.
THANK YOU!

I'm glad I'm not the only person who thinks this is all a tad ridiculous over a handheld game device

Hardware and software tampering has always brought consequences for the vast majority of computers and game systems, because while you may own the actual device, the company has proprietary control over all of the software and hardware designs, and tampering to get around the measures that they design in that device is usually pretty serious. Hacking can be fun and useful in certain circumstances, but the vast majority of the time, it can be harmful for the parent company and even other users. Comparisons to cars are generally woefully inadequate, but it would be closer to you being denied car registration because you modified it to the point where it is not street legal.

But the bottom line of this is, why should people care? The vast majority of users do not modify their systems, so why should they go through the trouble of petitioning Nintendo so that moders can mod legally. While I wouldn't say that all moders are pirates (though I have a hard time thinking of any other noteworthy modification for a 3DS) you cannot deny that Nintendo has a right to address the issue of piracy. If you want to get Nintendo to loosen their TOS, then more people need to crack down on pirates, otherwise why should they even bother? Even though Terms of Service are getting tougher, most people don't feel the effect of it at all. It may be foreboding for the future, but at the moment, no one cares.

As for the photo's, video's, and tracking, I agree it's a little nuts, but I really wouldn't bother with all that stuff on a 3DS anyway, if I even had one.
 

DarkBlood626

New member
Nov 9, 2008
142
0
0
Lionsfan said:
V8 Ninja said:
Who would have thought that Nintendo has the right to limit your use of their device when you mess with it? =P

God, I wish life didn't overstock on the idiots when it did.
Well just think of it this way. What if car companies said that they had the right to destroy any cars that were modded against Factory Specs?

Yes this is only gonna affect Pirates for the most part, but the notion that a company still has the rights to do something to a machine that I've bought and paid for is just unsettling. It eliminates purchasing power and turns it more or less into an extended lease
Do you have Allodial title to that car? no then you do not own it you have possession. To own it the way you think you do, you need to pay in cash and ask for the manufactures title of origin. Then you actually own the car and are not required to purchase insurance obtain a drivers licence (unless you are using the car to undertake in commerce)and so on.

If not the state partly owns it and you are obliged to follow what ever bullshit (speed limits) or other limitations on you?re right to travel or other right in context they see fit, oh but you own you?re house right well did you buy your house through retail?

Remember rights derive form property and you would be surprised how little claim you have to what you think you own
 

FriedRicer

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2010
173
4
23
RootBrewski said:
Panzervaughn said:
Tracking locations i can understand, Bricking it if you screw around with it, annoying but still understandable.

Owning rights to any picture you take? That seems like buying a camera and not owning the film.
Agreed the bricking issue is because, let's face it, people modding the system are doing so to play pirated games, so without condoning or condemning, I understand. The fact that Nintendo own any pictures or videos though seems far too invasive.
"without condoning or condemning, I understand."-Dr. Manhattan?
 

Demonstryde

New member
May 31, 2011
1
0
0
well i guess im really screwed if this is true.. apparently i have an unothorized version of mario party (someone cracked a cheap game and put mario party on it with mario party sticker)that i bought from ebay and played in my 3ds the first day i got it....i was not aware it was a hacked version until after i put it in my 3ds,,,,,,,so unless im a pirate this has obviously fucked me,, anyone else see a problem here? how is this stopping pirates if it screws someone who pays for a game and still gets screwed?
 

Lionsfan

I miss my old avatar
Jan 29, 2010
2,841
0
0
DarkBlood626 said:
Do you have Allodial title to that car? no then you do not own it you have possession. To own it the way you think you do, you need to pay in cash and ask for the manufactures title of origin. Then you actually own the car and are not required to purchase insurance obtain a drivers licence (unless you are using the car to undertake in commerce)and so on.

If not the state partly owns it and you are obliged to follow what ever bullshit (speed limits) or other limitations on you?re right to travel or other right in context they see fit, oh but you own you?re house right well did you buy your house through retail?

Remember rights derive form property and you would be surprised how little claim you have to what you think you own
An Allodial Title is for land and buildings....not vehicles....

And I'm not talking about if you're making payments on a vehicle to the dealer (whether it's a lease or something). I'm talking about a car that has been fully paid off, like how a DS would be