Same thing you do with all 3DS right now. Collect dust.totally heterosexual said:So wait what are they supposed to do with the bricks?
Same thing you do with all 3DS right now. Collect dust.totally heterosexual said:So wait what are they supposed to do with the bricks?
This part bothers me far more than the device being intentionally bricked for TOS breaking modifications.Along with Nintendo owning rights to video or pictures captured with the device
That had absolutly nothing at all to do with this discussion. not even close. the issue is the DRM on the Nintendo system having absolute control of it and they own content you create for it, not personal information getting hacked because it was stored on a server.Psycho Cat Industries said:http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/extra-credits/3306-NOT-a-Security-Episode
All discussion is ended.
Please do yourself a favor and look up "First Sale Doctrine". I don't mean this to sound snarky or smug, but assuming you don't live in the EU (and your profile says USA), it is something you should know.Katana314 said:I'm often a proponent of used games being just as bad as piracy, and feeling that Project $10 is fine.
tl;dr If I buy X product from you, you don't get any money if I sell it. Sorry. Also, at least there IS a sale done in Used gaming. 1 sale = 1 disk. With piracy, 1 sale can = hundreds of thousands of gamesThe first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus) and subsequently codified in the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 109. The doctrine allows the purchaser to transfer (i.e., sell, lend or give away) a particular lawfully made copy of the copyrighted work without permission once it has been obtained. This means that the copyright holder's rights to control the change of ownership of a particular copy ends once ownership of that copy has passed to someone else, as long as the copy itself is not an infringing copy. This doctrine is also referred to as the "right of first sale," "first sale rule," or "exhaustion rule."
Well, plus the Homebrewers.They get the shaft too. I give it a week before someone ends up buying a 'bricked' DS and end up sueing nintendo or something.Scrythe said:Then we could erect a brick monument to them.Aeshi said:Nice, now if we just count the number of people who sent bricks we'll know how many butthurt pirates this affects!
I think some people are jumping the gun here. How is this any different than what most smartphones do? The pirates are going to find a way around this feature anyways. The legacy of the PSP proved that. I have yet to read about a single unfair bricking yet, so who's really being affected here?
Cadillac does not own the rights to the car I bought. If I want to drop a 455 cubic inch motor that is turbocharged with 1800 horsepower into my 1994 DeVille body, Cadillac CAN NOT STOP ME. Nintendo IS doing that very thing. And trust me, these terms and conditions WILL NOT stop pirates, just good people like myself who like to modify things for the sheer joy of modification. (Or, to put it simply, because they can.)Echo136 said:Who would have thought Nintendo would have realized that the product you are purchasing from them just MIGHT be used for illegal purposes.
Oh, hey, an Ad Hominem attack! That makes your argument so much more persuasive!killamanhunter said:If you're not going to pirate or do anything to your device why would you care? Oh right you are going to pirate all of your DS games and circumvent the software and hardware now I know why you're complaining about the ToS now it all makes sense!
Don't make me quote that poem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came].Echo136 said:Really? Because in fact thats exactly how I feel. Ive owned a few current systems and none of those EULAs have ever prevented me from enjoying my games or made me feel like Im losing all my civil liberties.
In other words, what theyre doing in the US is illegal in Europe because we have clearer privacy laws? Well I never...Nintendo responded to the group in an interview with MCV UK. The Nintendo spokesperson pointed out that the European 3DS doesn't have the same terms and is "in compliance with European requirements."