Actually then we would call it a declaration of war on Japan from the country their boat is registered in. What they are doing now is already an act of aggression/piracy against the Japanese according to the international rules of the sea.Enkidu88 said:I wouldn't call it terrorism, all they do is go around blasting loud music at the whalers hardly anything traumatic. Now if the boat had attached torpedo launchers, then we could call it terrorism.TestECull said:What you're saying is that you support terrorism. That's all these types amount to. They show up unannounced, break in, scare the living hell out of some poor innocent worker, break a bunch of stuff, sometimes steal things, and get the hell out before anyone can find an assault rifle with which to rid the world of some pests.
I'm for protecting the environment, but I draw the line at terrorism. I don't care why they're doing it.
Why is eating whale wrong? it's delishous!XD but seriously though. like "slavery and stealing land"? This i a prime example of cultural imperialism. There is no good reason we shouldn't wahle if it's done responsibly. You just think it's barbaric because you don't do it. In my country many small fishing towns have to rely on whaling to get by. In Norway we tag and hunt whales that are getting old and have been way below our qouta for many, many years. And theres no whale shortage in our sea. So there =/Terminalchaos said:I think hunting endangered species is just as bad if not worse. They deserve to be attacked for attacking whales. Japan (along with some of the northern countries) is primarily responsible for our whale shortage int he first place. Their cultural proclivity to hunt and eat whale should be treated like other outdated and cruel cultural proclivities shared by other cultures such as slavery and stealing land.TestECull said:I can't wait for them to get sunk this time too. What they do amounts to terrorism.
there's nothing wrong with protesting whaling, but the line is quite firmly crossed when you start attacking whalers.
So, a slaughter house is equally disturbing your point? An why must everyone say that japan is killing endangered species, the whale that they hunt, the milke is not endangered at all. So there is no real reason why killing a whale, is any different than killing a pig.Nubrain said:While I've never really watch Whale wars I do agree that something needs to be be done about the japan's whaling industry. There is a documentry called "The Cove" that I think explains it very well. It's about a group of people that go to japan to tape the yearly dolphin fishery in this one town. they are followed around and actaully fear for thier lives and all they are planing to do is tape it not stop it. Well they do offer the fishermen the same amount of money they'd make from killing the dolphins if they just don't do it and they all refuse. Not because it's a clultural thing, not for the money, but just because they see dolphins as pests. The documentry explains a lot of the political things behind this and what Japan does to be able to legally whale (basicaly they buy votes on the internatal whaling comission) I'd recomend it to anyone to watch but just be carful the end is quite disturbing.
What the shit are you talking about? You assert something, I counter that assertion, you try to pretend that's an attack on you? Ad Hominem, look it up, read the definition, and understand why what I wrote was nowhere near a personal attack.TestECull said:Rules of Arguing over the Internet, article 42, section 5, line 32: "When in doubt, attack the person presenting the argument."sosolidshoe said:While I don't agree with doing violence to the fishermen themselves, and I'm a bit shaky over the morality of destroying the engines of the vessels themselves, the statement you make above is horseshit.
If Japan were actively engaged in kidnapping Africans and enslaving them, and this had been a tradition for thousands of years, ingrained in their culture as absolutely as whaling is, would you leap to their defence so? I doubt it very much. What about in Afghanistan, where it is "traditional" to blind a young girl with acid if she dares to attend a school and learn? Would you defend that kind of tradition? Now, you can argue whether or not the act of whaling itself is immoral, but "cultural reasons" are not reasons at all, to say otherwise is to say that morality is so subjective as to be meaningless.
Regardless even of that, what Japan does is not limited to Japan. They go whaling in International and even foreign waters, and the species they are hunting to extinction will be lost to the whole world, not merely their own nation. So, even in the event you DID decide to make the ridiculous argument that primitive cultural practices trump rational morality, the argument is invalid because those cultural practices have an effect on other nations and individuals who do not follow them, and do not wish to follow them.
When you can find a compelling reason for America to continue to be the bully and world police it has no right to be I'll be willing to listen to your point. Until then you're just some random joe on the internet pulling random personal attacks out of his back pocket. Good day, sir.