Orcas eat seals; clearly the orcas are terrorists.aldt said:As long as the whalers are only targeting specific species of whale - Minke, primarily, due to the abundant population, I've no problem with it.
I've always found it ironic that these so-called environmentalists tend to fight back by putting humans in danger. What next, radicals trying to protest against abortion by bombing buildings?
Wait, bad example.
Conservationists trying to save seals by harpooning Orca whales?
Just putting it out there. Torpedoes work by cracking the spine of the boat with a pressure wave of water from beneath (about 20feet or so if memory serves). This pressure wave is designed to crack about 15 inches or homologous rolled steel armor, and will liquefy the insides of any living creature (whales dolphins ect.) at over 500 meters.Enkidu88 said:Come on, torpedoing whaling ships would be much more entertaining television.
The whaling ships have armed guards.Zeeky_Santos said:What I don't get is why the 'Sea shepherds' don't just sink the whaling ships. I mean, wait till it's fucking dark, approach the ship in a tiny ass boat (hence slipping under their radar), climb up on the deck, go down to lower decks, plant pile of thermite at hull, escape.Berethond said:Why bother with the fancy new ship?
The whalers will just sink it like they did the last one.
A nice big hole in their hull should delay their 'research' for a while.
Cause you know doing that and potentially killing a bunch of people is you know....murder.Zeeky_Santos said:What I don't get is why the 'Sea shepherds' don't just sink the whaling ships. I mean, wait till it's fucking dark, approach the ship in a tiny ass boat (hence slipping under their radar), climb up on the deck, go down to lower decks, plant pile of thermite at hull, escape.Berethond said:Why bother with the fancy new ship?
The whalers will just sink it like they did the last one.
A nice big hole in their hull should delay their 'research' for a while.
Double A said:Berethond said:Why bother with the fancy new ship?Reality show.FalloutJack said:Anyway, question: Does this thing have guns?
Aha, I see the issue, you seem to have hallucinated while attempting to read my post, and somehow decided that my critique of your argument that "cultural reasons" are sufficient justification for hunting a species to extinction for me endorsing eco terrorist, despite me clearly stating my opinion on that matter in the first paragraph of my post.TestECull said:What I said was terrorizing innocent fisherman because of the game they're after is just as wrong as hunting something to extinction in the first place.sosolidshoe said:What the shit are you talking about?
Sure seemed like a personal attack. Counter-points don't usually have "your argument is invalid" or some variation thereof in them.You assert something, I counter that assertion, you try to pretend that's an attack on you?Doesn't matter. Anyone who's sentiments lean towards allowing the type of nonsense and eco-terrorism those groups commit is going to give my stupid government ideas of grandure. Openly endorsing such actions will only make them think Team America: World Police was a documentary.And for the record, I'm British, and my subscription to certain philosophical principles(namely Positivism and Cognitivism(specifically Ethical Naturalism)) have no fucking relation to America.
God, sometimes I'm ashamed to live under that flag...but now I'm starting to get off topic.